Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: Exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1119-1139

  He, Jinyu ^a   Huang, Zhi ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870417856     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2009.0824     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. 1901. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58:277-297.
2. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. 1995. Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68:29-52.
3. Atkinson, A. B. 1983. The economics of inequality (2nd ed.). Oxford, U. K: Clarendon Press.
4. Baker, W. E. 1984. The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology, 89:775-811.
5. Bales, R. F. 1970. Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart.
6. Baron, R. S., & Kerr, N. L. 2003. Group process, group decision, group action (2nd ed.). Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
7. Beckman, C. M., & Haunschild, P. R. 2002. Network learning: Tho effects of heterogeneity of partner's experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47:92-124.
8. Belliveau, M. A., O'Roilly, C. A., & Wade, J. B. 1996. Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39:1568-1593.
9. Blau, P. M. 1960. Patterns of deviation in work groups. Sociometry, 23:245-261.
10. Blau, P. M. 1977. A macrosociological theory of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 83:26-54.
11. Bourgeois, L., & Eisenhardt, K. 1988. Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34:816-835.
12. Boyd, B. K. 1995. CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16:301-312.
13. Cannella, A. A., Park, J., & Lee, H. 2008. Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member co-location and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51:768-784.
14. Carpenter, M. A. 2002. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23:275-284.
15. Carter, C. B., & Lorsch, J. 2004. Back to the drawing board: Designing corporate boards for a complex world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
16. Charan, R. 1998. Boards at work: How corporate boards create competitive advantage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Chatterjee, S., & Harrison, J. S. 2001. Corporate governance. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management: 543-563. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
18. D'Aveni, R. A. 1990. Top managerial prestige and organizational bankruptcy. Organization Science, 1:121-142.
19. Daily, C. M., Dalton. D. R., & Cannella, A. A. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28:371-382.
20. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19:269-290.
21. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. 2007. The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation. In J. P. Walsh & A. P. Brief (Eds.), Academy of Management annals, vol. 1:1-64. New York: Erlbaum.
22. Davis, G. F. 1991. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36:583-613.
23. Davis, G. F., Yoo, M., & Baker, W. E. 2003. Tho small world of the American corporato elite, 1982-2001. Strategic Organization, 1:301-326.
24. Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. 1984. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29:52-73.
25. Dysart, T., Junior, & Sharpe, R. 2005. Boardroom briefing interview: Director communication skills. Boardroom Briefing, 2(3):12-15.
26. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989a. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14:57-74.
27. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989b. Making fast stratogic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32:543-576.
28. Elitzur, R., & Yaari, V. 1995. Executive incentive compensation and earnings manipulation in a multi-period sotting. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 26:201-219.
29. Ferrier, W. J. 2001. Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44:858-877.
30. Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. 2003. Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2):101-113.
31. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24:489-505.
32. Garratt, B. 1996. The fish rots from the head: The crisis in our boardrooms. New York: HarperCollins.
33. Gini, C. 1912/1955. Variabilità e mutabilità. Reprinted in E. Pizetti & T. Salvemini (Eds.), Memorise di met-odologica slatistica. Rome: Libreria Eredi Virgilio Veschi.
34. Goode, W. J. 1978. The celebration of heroes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35. Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. 1994. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15:241-250.
36. Gould, R. 2002. The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 107:1143-1178.
37. Gould, R. 2003. Collision of wills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39. Groysberg, B., Polzer, J. T., & Elfenbein, H. A. 2011. Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organization Science, 22:722-737.
40. Harris, I. C, & Shimizu, K. 2011. Too busy to serve? An examination of the influence of overboarded directors. Journal of Management Studies, 41:775-798.
41. Haunschild, P. R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38:564-592.
42. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28:383-396.
43. Homans, G. C. 1961. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
44. Huse, M. 2007. Boards, governance and value creation. Cambridge, U. K: Cambridge University Press.
45. Hutchinson, M. R., & Gul, F. A. 2004. Investment opportunity set, corporate governance practices and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10:595-614.
46. Jensen, M. C, & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305-360.
47. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M, & Ellstrand, A. E. 1996. Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22:409-438.
48. Johnson, P. 2004. Shared thinking and interaction in the family business boardroom. Corporate Governance, 4(1):39-51.
49. Judge, W. Q., & Miller, A. 1991. Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 34:449-463.
50. Judge, W. Q., & Zeithaml, C. P. 1992. Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvemont in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35:766-794.
51. Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. 1988. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31:570-598.
52. Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. 2005. How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influonce firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26:489-496.
53. Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. R. 1993. Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review, 71(4);104-111.
54. Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., & Batra, B. 1992. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and roorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management Journal, 13:585-608.
55. Lave, C. A., & March, J. G. 1993. An introduction to models in the social sciences. Lanham, MA: University Press of America.
56. Leblanc, R., & Gillies, J. 2005. Inside the boardroom: What directors, investors, managers and regulators must know about boards of directors. Missis-sauga, Ontario: Wiley.
57. Lerman, R. I., & Yitzhaki, S. 1984. A note on the calculation and interpretation of the gini index. Economics Letters, 15:363-368.
58. Lorsch, J. W., & Maclver, E. 1989. Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
59. Mace, M. L. 1986. Directors: Myth and reality (2nd ed.). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
60. Magee, J. C, & Galinsky, A. D. 2008. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. In J. P. Walsh & A. P. Brief (Eds.), Academy of Management annals, vol. 2:351-398. Essex, U. K.: Rout-ledgo.
61. McNuIty, T., & Pettigrew, A. 1999. Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20:47-74.
62. Morton, R. K. 1940. Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18:560-568.
63. Merton, R. K. 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
64. Millor, G. A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63:81-97.
65. Mizruchi, M. S. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directories. In J. Hagan & K. Cook (Eds.), Annual review of sociology, vol. 22:271-298. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
66. Moscovici, S., & Doise, W. 1994. Conflict and consensus: A general theory of collective decisions. London: Sago.
67. Noff, T.)., & Uoidrick, R. L. 2006. Why board service is still attractive. Corporate Board, 158(27):1-5.
68. Overbeck, J. R., Correll, J., & Park, B. 2005. Internal status sorting in groups: The problem of too many stars. Research on Managing Groups & Teams, 7:169-199.
69. Palmer, D. A., Jennings, P. D., & Zhou, X. 1993. Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U. S. corporations; Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38:100-131.
70. Pearce, J. A. I., & Zahra, S. A. 1992. Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29:411-438.
71. Pettigrew, A. M. 1992. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13:163-182.
72. Phillips, D. J., & Zuckerman, E. W. 2001. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107:379-429.
73. Pyatt, G., Chen, C, & Fei, J. 1980. The distribution of income by factor components. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95:451-473.
74. Ridgoway, C. L. 2006. Linking social structure and interpersonal behavior: A theoretical perspective on cultural schemas and social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(1):5-16.
75. Ridgoway, C. L., & Johnson, C. 1990. What is the relationship between socioomotional behavior and status in task group? American Journal of Sociology, 95:1189-1212.
76. Ridgeway, C. L., Johnson, C, & Diekema, D. 1994. External status, legitimacy, and compliance in male and female groups. Social Forces, 72:1051-1077.
77. Simmel, G. 1950. The sociology of George Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
78. Simon, H. A. 1957. Models of man. Oxford, U. K.: Wiley.
79. Steiner, I. 1972. Group process and productivity. New York: Academy Press.
80. Tannenbaum, A. S., Kavcic, B., Rosner, M., Vianello, M., & Wieser, G. 1974. Hierarchy in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
81. Tuschke, A., & Sandors, W. G. 2003. Antecedents and consequences of corporate governance reform: The case of Germany. Strategic Management Journal, 24:631-649.
82. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185:1124-1130.
83. Useem, M. 1984. The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the U. S. and U. K. New York: Oxford University Press.
84. Westphal, J. D. 1998. Board games: How CEOs adapt to increases in structural board independence from management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43:511-537.
85. Westphal, J. D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42:7-24.
86. Westphal, J. D., & Bednar, M. 2005. Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms' strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50:262-298.
87. Westphal, J. D., & Stern, I. 2006. The other pathway to the boardroom: Interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51:169-204.
88. Westphal, J. D., & Stern, I. 2007. Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male Caucasian): How ingratiation, boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments at U. S.companies. Academy of Management Journal, 50:267-288.
89. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 1996. Director reputation, CEO-board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:507-529.
90. Whyte, W. F. 1943. Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
91. Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. I. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15:291-334.