Participatory learning through behavioral and cognitive engagements in an online collective information searching activity

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 543-566

  Lin, Chia Ching ^a   Tsai, Chin Chung ^b  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cognitive engagement; Online information searching; Participatory learning; Social bookmarking; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870398388     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-012-9160-1     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Balamuralithara, B., & Woods, P. C. (2009). Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and remote lab. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 17(1), 108-118.
2. Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475-488). New York: Cambridge.
3. Bourne, J., Harris, D., & Mayadas, F. (2005). Online engineering education: Learning anywhere, anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 131-146.
4. Butler, K. A., & Lumpe, A. (2008). Student use of scaffolding software: Relationships with motivation and conceptual understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 427-436.
5. Carroll, N. L., Markauskaite, L., & Calvo, R. A. (2007). E-portfolios for developing transferable skills in a freshman engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 50(4), 360-366.
6. Chan, C. K. K., & Chan, Y. Y. (2011). Students' views of collaboration and online participation in knowledge forum. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1445-1457.
7. Chou, S. W., & Min, H. T. (2009). The impact of media on collaborative learning in virtual settings: The perspective of social construction. Computers & Education, 52(2), 417-431.
8. Cobern, W. W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. G. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 51-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657-663.
10. de Vries, B., van der Meij, H., & Lazonder, A. W. (2008). Supporting reflective in elementary web searching schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 649-665.
11. De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6-28.
12. Fang, N., Stewardson, G. A., & Lubke, M. M. (2008). Enhancing student learning of an undergraduate manufacturing course with computer simulations. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(3), 558-566.
13. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, P. C. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
14. Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181-192.
15. Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462-482.
16. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age Web 2. 0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259.
17. Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Grosseck, G. (2009). To use or not to use web 2. 0 in higher education? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 478-482.
19. Guan, Y. H., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, F. K. (2006). Content analysis of online discussion on a senior-high-school discussion forum of a virtual physics laboratory. Instructional Science, 34(4), 279-311.
20. Hansen, P., & Jarvelin, K. (2005). Collaborative information retrieval in an information-intensive domain. Information Processing and Management, 41(5), 1101-1119.
21. Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle school learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323-346.
22. Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2009). Using blogs as a professional development tool for teachers: Analysis of interaction behavioral patterns. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 325-340.
23. Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1755-1765.
24. Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78-82.
25. Huang, Y. M., Yang, S. J. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Web 2. 0 for interactive e-learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 257-259.
26. Jin, X. L., Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Chen, H. P. (2009). How to keep members using the information in a computer-supported social network. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1172-1181.
27. Jonassen, D. H. (2002). Learning as activity. Educational Technology, 42(2), 45-51.
28. Jonassen, D. H., Howlan, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). (Ed.) Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
29. Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., & Conolea, G. (2008). Characterising the different blogging behaviours of students on an online distance learning course. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(1), 21-33.
30. Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2009). Developing web literacy in collaborative inquiry activities. Computers & Education, 52(3), 668-680.
31. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lin, C.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Applying social bookmarking to collective information searching (CIS): An analysis of behavioral pattern and peer interaction for co-exploring quality online resources. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1249-1257.
33. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., & d' Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449-521.
34. Mendenhall, A., & Johnson, T. E. (2010). Fostering the development of critical thinking skills, and reading comprehension of undergraduates using a Web 2. 0 tool coupled with a learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(3), 263-276.
35. Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2. 0, new literacies, and the idea of learning through participation. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 107-122.
36. Meyer, K. (2004). Evaluating online discussions: Four different frames of analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 101-114.
37. Michinov, N., Brunot, S., Le Bohec, O., Juhel, J., & Delaval, M. (2011). Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 56(1), 243-252.
38. Milligan, G. W. (1985). An algorithm for generating artificial test clusters. Psychometrika, 50(1), 123-127.
39. Morrison, P. J. (2008). Tagging of and searching: Search retrieval effectiveness folksonomies on the World Wide Web. Information Processing and Management, 44(4), 1562-1579.
40. Palmer, S., & Hall, W. (2008). Application of podcasting in online engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(1), 101-106.
41. Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 847-858.
42. Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243-265.
43. Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
44. Punj, G., & Stewart, D. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(2), 134-148.
45. Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
46. Rovai, A. P., & Barnum, K. T. (2003). On-line course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 57-73.
47. Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460.
48. Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupil's understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14(1), 63-82.
49. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-425). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Tsai, C. C. (2001). A review and discussion of epistemological commitments, metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestions on their enhancement in Internet-assisted chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(7), 970-974.
51. von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in education. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies (Supplementary Vol. 1, pp. 162-163). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
52. von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
54. Xie, Y., Ke, F. F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes. Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 18-25.
55. Xie, Y., Ke, F. F., & Sharma, P. (2010). The effects of peer-interaction styles in team blogs on students' cognitive thinking and blog participation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(4), 459-479.
56. Zhu, E. P. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34(6), 451-480.
57. Zhu, X. H., Chen, A., Ennis, C., Sun, H. C., Hopple, C., Bonello, M., et al. (2009). Situational interest, cognitive engagement, and achievement in physical education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(3), 221-229.