Factors influencing Argumentative Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ACSCL) in higher education

Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning, ICEL

Volumn 2009-January, Issue , 2009, Pages 394-402

  Noroozi, Omid ^a   Mulder, Martin ^a   Biemans, Harm ^a   Chizari, Mohammad ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

ACSCL; Argumentation; Collaborative Learning; CSCL; Higher education

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; STUDENTS;

ACSCL; ARGUMENTATION; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; CSCL; HIGHER EDUCATION;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84898284266     PISSN: 20488882     EISSN: 20488890     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments.v9 Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Andriessen, J. E. B. (2006). Arguing to learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443-460). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baker, M. (1996). Argumentation and cognitive change in collaborative problem-solving dialogues (Report No. CR-13/96). France: COAST.
4. Baker, M. (1999). Argumentation and constructive interaction. In G. Rijlaarsdam & E. Espéret (series Eds.) & J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol 5. Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 179-202) Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
5. Biggs, J B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does: Buckingham: open university press, second edition.
6. Bull, S., & Broady, E. (1997). Spontaneous peer tutoring from sharing student models. In B. du Boulay & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.), Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 143-150). Kobe: IOS Press.
7. De Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R.-J. (2007). Online teaching in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher. Instructional Science, 35(3), 257-286.
8. Ellis, R. A. & Calvo, R. A. (2004). Learning through discussions in blended environments. Educational Media International, 41, 3, 263-274.
9. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10. Kiesler, S. (1986). The Hidden Messages in Computer Networks. Harvard Business Review, 64:46-60.
11. Kneser C, Ploetzner R (2001) Collaboration on the basis of complementary domain knowledge: observed dialogue structures and their relation to learning success. Learning and Instruction 11:53-83.
12. Liu, C. C; and Tsai, C. C. (2008). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education 50 (2008) 627-639.
13. Luning, P. A., & Marcelis, W. J. (2006). A techno-managerial approach in food quality management research. Trends in Food Science&Technology, 17(7), 378-385.
14. Luning, P. A., Marcelis, W. J., & Jongen, W. M. F. (2002). Food quality management, a techno-managerial approach: Wageningen Pers, Wageningen.
15. Mahdizadeh, H. (2007). Student collaboration and learning. Knowledge construction and participation in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environment in higher education. PhD dissertation, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
16. Mansilla, V. B. (2004). Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads. Change, 37, 14-21.
17. Munneke, L; Andriessen, J; Kanselaar, G; and Kirschner, P. (2007). Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 1072-1088.
18. Nussbaum, E. M., & Jacobson, T. E. (2004, July). Reasons that students avoid intellectual arguments. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.
19. Rummel, N. & Spada, H. (2004). Cracking the nut-but which nutcracker to use? Diversity in approaches to analyzing collaborative processes in technology-supported settings. In Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon & F. Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 23). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 957-975.
21. Slavin, R. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: a best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293-336.
22. Stein, N. L., Calicchia, D. J, & Bernas, R. S. (1996). Conflict talk. Understanding and resolving arguments. In T. Givon (Ed.), Typological studies in language: Conversational analysis (pp. 233-267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Learning & Teaching Argumentation, Middlesex, London.
23. Suthers, D. (2003). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 27-46). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1958.
25. Van Amelsvoort, M. (2006). A Space for Debate. How diagrams support collaborative argumentation-based learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
26. Van Amelsvoort, M., & Ainsworth, S. (2007). Secondary notation in argumentative diagrams. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. Van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 16(4), 485-521.
28. Veerman, A. L. (2000). Computer supported collaborative learning through argumentation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
29. Veerman, A. L., & Andriessen, J. E. B. (1997). Academic learning and writing through the use of educational technology. Paper presented at the Conference on Learning and Teaching Argumentation, 4-6 Sept. 1997, Middlesex University, London, 1997.
30. Veerman, A. L., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar, G. (2002). Collaborative argumentation in academic education. Instructional Science. 30(3), 155-186.
31. Veermans, K. H. (2003). Intelligent support for discovery learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
32. Zurita, G., Nussbaum, M., & Salinas, R. (2005). Dynamic Grouping in Collaborative Learning Supported by Wireless Handhelds. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 149-161.