Modelling reveals novel roles of two parallel signalling pathways and homeostatic feedbacks in yeast

Molecular Systems Biology

Volumn 8, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Schaber, Jörg ^a   Baltanas, Rodrigo ^b   Bush, Alan ^b   Klipp, Edda ^c   Colman Lerner, Alejandro ^b  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

adaptation; ensemble modeling; Hopf bifurcation; model discrimination; osmotic stress

Indexed keywords

GLYCEROL; STRESS ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; STRESS ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE HOG1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HOG1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SPT2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HOMEOSTASIS; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NONHUMAN; OSMOLARITY; OSMOTIC STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEADY STATE; WILD TYPE; YEAST; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG ANTAGONISM; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; INTRACELLULAR SPACE; METABOLISM; MUTATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EUKARYOTA;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; GLYCEROL; HOMEOSTASIS; INTRACELLULAR SPACE; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84869456236     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17444292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/msb.2012.53     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adrover MA, Zi Z, Duch A, Schaber J, González-Novo A, Jimenez J, Nadal-Ribelles M, ClotetJ, Klipp E, Posas F (2011) Time-dependent quantitative multicomponent control of the G-S network by the stress-activated protein kinase Hog1 upon osmostress. Sci Signal 4: ra63
2. Albertyn J, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, Prior BA (1994) GPD1, which encodes glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, is essential for growth under osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and its expression is regulated by the high-osmolarity glycerol response pathway. Mol Cell Biol 14: 4135-4144
3. Alon U (2007) An Introduction to Systems Biology. Mathematical and Computational Biology Series. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC
4. Ausubel FM et al (1987-2006) Current Protocols inMolecularBiology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5. Beese SE, Negishi T, Levin DE (2009) Identification of positive regulators of the yeast fps1 glycerol channel. PLoS Genet 5: e1000738
6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach. New York, NY Springer
7. Chernomoretz A, Bush A, Yu R, Gordon A, Colman-Lerner A (2008) Using Cell-ID 1.4 with R for microscope-based cytometry. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter 14, Unit 14-18
8. Colman-Lerner A, Gordon A, Serra E, Chin T, Resnekov O, Endy D, Pesce CG, Brent R (2005) Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system. Nature 437: 699-706 (Pubitemid 41486534)
9. Dihazi H, Kessler R, Eschrich K (2004) High osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway-induced phosphorylation and activation of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase are essential for glycerol accumulation and yeast cell proliferation under hyperosmotic stress. J Biol Chem 279: 23961-23968 (Pubitemid 38725254)
10. Flottmann M, Schaber J, Hoops S, Klipp E, Mendes P (2008) ModelMage: a tool for automatic model generation, selection and management. Genome Inform 20: 52-63
11. Gaudet S, Spencer SL, Chen WW, Sorger PK (2012) Exploring the contextual sensitivity of factors that determine cell-to-cell variability in receptor-mediated apoptosis. PLoS Comput Biol 8: e1002482
12. Gennemark P, Nordlander B, Hohmann S, Wedelin D (2006) A simple mathematical model of adaptation to high osmolarity in yeast. In Silico Biol 6: 193-214 (Pubitemid 44508929)
13. Gordon A, Colman-Lerner A, Chin TE, Benjamin KR, Yu RC, Brent R (2007) Single-cell quantification of molecules and rates using open-source microscope-based cytometry. Nat Methods4: 175-181 (Pubitemid 46454687)
14. Guthrie C, Fink GR (1991) Methods in Enzymology, Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology. San Diego, California: Academic Press 92101
15. Hao N, Behar M, Parnell SC, Torres MP, Borchers CH, Elston TC, Dohlman HG (2007) A systems-biology analysis of feedback inhibition in the Sho1 osmotic-stress-response pathway. CurrBiol 17: 659-667 (Pubitemid 46552242)
16. Hao N, Zeng Y Elston TC, Dohlman HG (2008) Control of MAPK specificity by feedback phosphorylation of shared adaptor protein Ste50. JBiol Chem 283: 33798-33802
17. Hersen P, McClean MN, Mahadevan L, Ramanathan S (2008) Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 7165-7170 (Pubitemid 351754449)
18. Hohmann S (2002) Osmotic adaptation in yeast-control of the yeast osmolyte system. IntRev Cytol 215: 149-187 (Pubitemid 34280294)
19. Hohmann S (2002) Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66: 300-372 (Pubitemid 34625712)
20. Hoops S, Sahle S, Gauges R, Lee C, Pahle J, Simus N, Singhal M, Xu L, Mendes P, Kummer U (2006) COPASI-a COmplex PAthway SImulator. Bioinformatics 22: 3067-3074
21. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, Bolouri H, Doyle JC, Kitano H, Arkin AP, Bornstein BJ, Bray D, Cornish-Bowden A, Cuellar AA, Dronov S, Gilles ED, Ginkel M, Gor V, Goryanin II, Hedley WJ, Hodgman TC, Hofmeyr JH, Hunter PJ et al (2003) The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 19: 524-531 (Pubitemid 36336519)
22. Kholodenko BN (2000) Negative feedback and ultrasensitivity can bring about oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. EurJBiochem267: 1583-1588 (Pubitemid 30165509)
23. Klipp E, Nordlander B, Krüger R, Gennemark P, Hohmann S (2005) Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock. Nat Biotechnol 23: 975-982 (Pubitemid 41114031)
24. Klipp E, Schaber J (2008) Modeling the dynamics of stress activated protein kinases (SAPK) in cellular stress response. Top Curr Genet 205-224
25. Kuhn C, Klipp E (2012) Zooming in on yeast osmoadaptation. Adv Exp Med Biol 736: 293-310
26. Lestas I, Vinnicombe G, Paulsson J (2010) Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations. Nature 467: 174-178
27. Luyten K, Albertyn J, Skibbe F, Prior BA, Ramos J, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S (1994) The FPS1 gene product functions as a glycerol facilitator in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 39: 534-536
28. Macia J, Regot S, Peeters T, Conde N, Solé R, Posas F (2009) Dynamic signaling in the Hog1 MAPK pathway relies on high basal signal transduction. Sci Signal 2: ra13
29. McCool KW, Miyamoto S (2012) DNA damage-dependent NF-kappaB activation: NEMO turns nuclear signaling inside out. Immunol Rev 246: 311-326
30. Mettetal JT, Muzzey D, Gómez-Uribe C, van Oudenaarden A (2008) The frequency dependence of osmo-adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 319: 482-484 (Pubitemid 351160584)
31. Mollapour M, Piper PW (2007) Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation targets the yeast Fps1 aquaglyceroporin for endocytosis, thereby rendering cells resistant to acetic acid. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6446-6456 (Pubitemid 47435750)
32. Muzzey D, Gómez-Uribe CA, Mettetal JT, van Oudenaarden A (2009) A systems-level analysis of perfect adaptation in yeast osmoregulation. Cell 138: 160-171
33. Nelson B, Parsons AB, Evangelista M, Schaefer K, Kennedy K, Ritchie S, Petryshen TL, Boone C (2004) Fus1p interacts with components of the Hog1p mitogen-activated protein kinase and Cdc42p morphogenesis signaling pathways to control cell fusion during yeast mating. Genetics 166: 67-77 (Pubitemid 38364703)
34. Nevoigt E, Stahl U (1997) Osmoregulation and glycerol metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 21: 231-241 (Pubitemid 28018203)
35. O'Rourke SM, Herskowitz I (1998) The Hog1 MAPK prevents cross talk between the HOG and pheromone response MAPK pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 12: 2874-2886 (Pubitemid 28440146)
36. O'Rourke SM, Herskowitz I, O'Shea EK (2002) Yeast go the whole HOG for the hyperosmotic response. Trends Genet 18: 405-412 (Pubitemid 34874538)
37. Posas F, Wurgler-Murphy SM, Maeda T, Witten EA, Thai TC, Saito H (1996) Yeast HOG1 MAP kinase cascade is regulated by a multistep phosphorelay mechanism in the SLN1-YPD1-SSK1 "two-component" osmosensor. Cell 86: 865-875 (Pubitemid 26336791)
38. Raue A, Kreutz C, Maiwald T, Bachmann J, Schilling M, Klingmüller U, Timmer J (2009) Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics 25: 1923-1929
39. Reiser V, Raitt DC, Saito H (2003) Yeast osmosensor Sln1 and plant cytokinin receptor Cre1 respond to changes in turgor pressure. JCellBiol 161: 1035-1040 (Pubitemid 36870166)
40. Rep M, Albertyn J, Thevelein JM, Prior BA, Hohmann S (1999) Different signalling pathways contribute to the control of GPD1 gene expression by osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 145: 715-727 (Pubitemid 29127052)
41. Sampaio C, Dance M, Montagner A, Edouard T, Malet N, Perret B, Yart A, Salles JP, Raynal P (2008) Signal strength dictates phosphoinositide 3-kinase contribution to Ras/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 activation via differential Gab1/Shp2 recruitment: consequences for resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition. Mol Cell Biol 28: 587-600
42. Schaber J (2012) Easy parameter identifiability analysis with COPASI. Biosystems (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2012.09.003)
43. Schaber J, Adrover MA, Eriksson E, Pelet S, Petelenz-Kurdziel E,KleinD, Posas F, Goksör M, Peter M, Hohmann S, Klipp E (2010) Biophysical properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their relationship with HOG pathway activation. EurBiophys J39: 1547-1556
44. Schaber J, Flöttmann M, Li J, Tiger CF, Hohmann S, Klipp E (2011) Automated ensemble modeling with modelMaGe: analyzing feedback mechanisms in the Sho1 branch of the HOG pathway. PLoS One 6: e14791
45. Schaber J, Klipp E (2008) Short-term volume and turgor regulation in yeast. Essays Biochem 45: 147-159
46. Schaber J, Klipp E (2011) Model-based inference of biochemical parameters and dynamic properties of microbial signal transduction networks. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22: 109-116
47. Schaber J, Liebermeister W, Klipp E (2009) Nested uncertainties in biochemical models. IETSyst Biol 3: 1-9
48. Schwartz MA, Madhani HD (2004) Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet 38: 725-748 (Pubitemid 40013743)
49. Tamas MJ, Karlgren S, Bill RM, Hedfalk K, Allegri L, Ferreira M, Thevelein JM, Rydström J, Mullins JG, Hohmann S (2003) A short regulatory domain restricts glycerol transport through yeast Fps1p. JBiol Chem 278: 6337-6345 (Pubitemid 36800892)
50. Tamas MJ, Luyten K, Sutherland FC, Hernandez A, Albertyn J, Valadi H, Li H, Prior BA, Kilian SG, Ramos J, Gustafsson L, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S (1999) Fps1p controls the accumulation and release of the compatible solute glycerol in yeast osmoregulation. Mol Microbiol 31: 1087-1104 (Pubitemid 29082239)
51. Tamas MJ, Rep M, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S (2000) Stimulation of the yeast high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway: evidence for a signal generated by a change in turgor rather than by water stress. FEBSLett472: 159-165 (Pubitemid 30224606)
52. Tatebayashi K, Takekawa M, Saito H (2003) A docking site determining specificity of Pbs2 MAPKK for Ssk2/Ssk22 MAPKKKs in the yeast HOG pathway. EmboJ22: 3624-3634 (Pubitemid 36898339)
53. Tatebayashi K, Tanaka K, Yang HY, Yamamoto K, Matsushita Y Tomida T, Imai M, Saito H (2007) Transmembrane mucins Hkr1 and Msb2 are putative osmosensors in the SHO1 branch of yeast HOG pathway. EMBO J26: 3521-3533 (Pubitemid 47236880)
54. Tsai TY, Choi YS, Ma W, Pomerening JR, Tang C, Ferrell Jr JE (2008) Robust, tunable biological oscillations from interlinked positive and negative feedback loops. Science 321: 126-129
55. Wurgler-Murphy SM, Maeda T, Witten EA, Saito H (1997) Regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HOG1 mitogen-activated protein kinase by the PTP2 and PTP3 protein tyrosine phosphatases. Mol CellBiol 17: 1289-1297 (Pubitemid 27097358)
56. Yamamoto K, Tatebayashi K, Tanaka K, Saito H (2010) Dynamic control of yeast MAP kinase network by induced association and dissociation between the Ste50 scaffold and the Opy2 membrane anchor. Mol Cell 40: 87-98
57. Yu RC, Pesce CG, Colman-Lerner A, Lok L, Pincus D, Serra E, Holl M, Benjamin K, Gordon A, Brent R (2008) Negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast signalling. Nature 456: 755-761