Quantitative phosphoproteomics to characterize signaling networks

Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 863-871

  Rigbolt, Kristoffer T G ^a   Blagoev, Blagoy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Mass spectrometry; Phosphoproteomics; Signal transduction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868503645     PISSN: 10849521     EISSN: 10963634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.05.006     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Hunter T. Signaling - 2000 and beyond. Cell 2000, 100:113-127.
2. Cox J., Mann M. Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. Annual Review of Biochemistry 2011, 80:273-299.
3. Choudhary C., Mann M. Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2010, 11:427-439.
4. Macek B., Mann M., Olsen J.V. Global and site-specific quantitative phosphoproteomics: principles and applications. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 2009, 49:199-221.
5. Wu R., Haas W., Dephoure N., Huttlin E.L., Zhai B., Sowa M.E., et al. A large-scale method to measure absolute protein phosphorylation stoichiometries. Nature Methods 2011, 8:677-683.
6. Olsen J.V., Vermeulen M., Santamaria A., Kumar C., Miller M.L., Jensen L.J., et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Science Signaling 2010, 3:ra3.
7. Prakash A., Piening B., Whiteaker J., Zhang H., Shaffer S.A., Martin D., et al. Assessing bias in experiment design for large scale mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2007, 6:1741-1748.
8. Schwanhausser B., Busse D., Li N., Dittmar G., Schuchhardt J., Wolf J., et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 2011, 473:337-342.
9. Gold M.R., Yungwirth T., Sutherland C.L., Ingham R.J., Vianzon D., Chiu R., et al. Purification and identification of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins from B lymphocytes stimulated through the antigen receptor. Electrophoresis 1994, 15:441-453.
10. Pandey A., Podtelejnikov A.V., Blagoev B., Bustelo X.R., Mann M., Lodish H.F. Analysis of receptor signaling pathways by mass spectrometry: identification of vav-2 as a substrate of the epidermal and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2000, 97:179-184.
11. Pandey A., Blagoev B., Kratchmarova I., Fernandez M., Nielsen M., Kristiansen T.Z., et al. Cloning of a novel phosphotyrosine binding domain containing molecule, Odin, involved in signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Oncogene 2002, 21:8029-8036.
12. Zhang Y., Wolf-Yadlin A., Ross P.L., Pappin D.J., Rush J., Lauffenburger D.A., et al. Time-resolved mass spectrometry of tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling network reveals dynamic modules. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2005, 4:1240-1250.
13. Blagoev B., Ong S.E., Kratchmarova I., Mann M. Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomics. Nature Biotechnology 2004, 22:1139-1145.
14. Hammond D.E., Hyde R., Kratchmarova I., Beynon R.J., Blagoev B., Clague M.J. Quantitative analysis of HGF and EGF-dependent phosphotyrosine signaling networks. Journal of Proteome Research 2010, 9:2734-2742.
15. Osinalde N., Moss H., Arrizabalaga O., Omaetxebarria M.J., Blagoev B., Zubiaga A.M., et al. Interleukin-2 signaling pathway analysis by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Journal of Proteomics 2011, 75:177-191.
16. Posewitz M.C., Tempst P. Immobilized gallium(III) affinity chromatography of phosphopeptides. Analytical Chemistry 1999, 71:2883-2892.
17. Gygi S.P., Rist B., Gerber S.A., Turecek F., Gelb M.H., Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nature Biotechnology 1999, 17:994-999.
18. Ficarro S.B., McCleland M.L., Stukenberg P.T., Burke D.J., Ross M.M., Shabanowitz J., et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature Biotechnology 2002, 20:301-305.
19. Larsen M.R., Thingholm T.E., Jensen O.N., Roepstorff P., Jorgensen T.J. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2005, 4:873-886.
20. Pinkse M.W., Uitto P.M., Hilhorst M.J., Ooms B., Heck A.J. Selective isolation at the femtomole level of phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests using 2D-NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS and titanium oxide precolumns. Analytical Chemistry 2004, 76:3935-3943.
21. Sugiyama N., Masuda T., Shinoda K., Nakamura A., Tomita M., Ishihama Y. Phosphopeptide enrichment by aliphatic hydroxy acid-modified metal oxide chromatography for nano-LC-MS/MS in proteomics applications. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2007, 6:1103-1109.
22. Imami K., Sugiyama N., Kyono Y., Tomita M., Ishihama Y. Automated phosphoproteome analysis for cultured cancer cells by two-dimensional nanoLC-MS using a calcined titania/C18 biphasic column. Analytical Sciences 2008, 24:161-166.
23. 2-reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography phosphochip coupled to a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82:824-832.
24. 2-based phosphoproteomics applied to study endogenous phosphorylation in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Proteome Research 2008, 7:687-697.
25. Gruhler A., Olsen J.V., Mohammed S., Mortensen P., Faergeman N.J., Mann M., et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2005, 4:310-327.
26. Beausoleil S.A., Jedrychowski M., Schwartz D., Elias J.E., Villen J., Li J., et al. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101:12130-12135.
27. Alpert A.J. Electrostatic repulsion hydrophilic interaction chromatography for isocratic separation of charged solutes and selective isolation of phosphopeptides. Analytical Chemistry 2008, 80:62-76.
28. McNulty D.E., Annan R.S. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography reduces the complexity of the phosphoproteome and improves global phosphopeptide isolation and detection. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2008, 7:971-980.
29. 2 for global phosphoproteomics approaches. Journal of Proteome Research 2011, 10(8):3474-3483.
30. Makarov A. Electrostatic axially harmonic orbital trapping: a high-performance technique of mass analysis. Analytical Chemistry 2000, 72:1156-1162.
31. Makarov A., Denisov E., Kholomeev A., Balschun W., Lange O., Strupat K., et al. Performance evaluation of a hybrid linear ion trap/orbitrap mass spectrometer. Analytical Chemistry 2006, 78:2113-2120.
32. Cox J., Neuhauser N., Michalski A., Scheltema R.A., Olsen J.V., Mann M. Andromeda - a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. Journal of Proteome Research 2011, 10(4):1794-1805.
33. Choudhary C., Kumar C., Gnad F., Nielsen M.L., Rehman M., Walther T.C., et al. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science 2009, 325:834-840.
34. Geiger T., Cox J., Mann M. Proteomics on an Orbitrap benchtop mass spectrometer using all-ion fragmentation. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2010, 9:2252-2261.
35. Michalski A., Damoc E., Hauschild J.P., Lange O., Wieghaus A., Makarov A., et al. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics using Q Exactive, a high-performance benchtop quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 2011, 10. M111.011015.
36. Olsen J.V., Mann M. Improved peptide identification in proteomics by two consecutive stages of mass spectrometric fragmentation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101:13417-13422.
37. Olsen J.V., Macek B., Lange O., Makarov A., Horning S., Mann M. Higher-energy C-trap dissociation for peptide modification analysis. Nature Methods 2007, 4:709-712.
38. Schroeder M.J., Shabanowitz J., Schwartz J.C., Hunt D.F., Coon J.J. A neutral loss activation method for improved phosphopeptide sequence analysis by quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2004, 76:3590-3598.
39. Zubarev R.A., Kelleher N.L., McLafferty F.W. Electron capture dissociation of multiply charged protein cations. A nonergodic process. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1998, 120:3265-3266.
40. Syka J.E., Coon J.J., Schroeder M.J., Shabanowitz J., Hunt D.F. Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101:9528-9533.
41. Biemann K., Scoble H.A. Characterization by tandem mass spectrometry of structural modifications in proteins. Science 1987, 237:992-998.
42. Dengjel J., Akimov V., Olsen J.V., Bunkenborg J., Mann M., Blagoev B., et al. Quantitative proteomic assessment of very early cellular signaling events. Nature Biotechnology 2007, 25:566-568.
43. Dengjel J., Kratchmarova I., Blagoev B. Receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: a view from quantitative proteomics. Molecular BioSystems 2009, 5:1112-1121.
44. Browne T.R., Van Langenhove A., Costello C.E., Biemann K., Greenblatt D.J. Kinetic equivalence of stable-isotope-labeled and unlabeled phenytoin. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1981, 29:511-515.
45. Oda Y., Huang K., Cross F.R., Cowburn D., Chait B.T. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1999, 96:6591-6596.
46. Ong S.E., Blagoev B., Kratchmarova I., Kristensen D.B., Steen H., Pandey A., et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2002, 1:376-386.
47. Rigbolt K.T., Blagoev B. Proteome-wide quantitation by SILAC. Methods in Molecular Biology 2010, 658:187-204.
48. Boersema P.J., Raijmakers R., Lemeer S., Mohammed S., Heck A.J. Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Nature Protocols 2009, 4:484-494.
49. Ross P.L., Huang Y.N., Marchese J.N., Williamson B., Parker K., Hattan S., et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2004, 3:1154-1169.
50. Kumar C., Mann M. Bioinformatics analysis of mass spectrometry-based proteomics data sets. FEBS Letters 2009, 583:1703-1712.
51. Rigbolt K.T., Vanselow J.T., Blagoev B. GProX, a user-friendly platform for bioinformatics analysis and visualization of quantitative proteomics data. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2011, 10. O110.007450.
52. Olsen J.V., Blagoev B., Gnad F., Macek B., Kumar C., Mortensen P., et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 2006, 127:635-648.
53. Rigbolt K.T., Prokhorova T.A., Akimov V., Henningsen J., Johansen P.T., Kratchmarova I., et al. System-wide temporal characterization of the proteome and phosphoproteome of human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Science Signaling 2011, 4:rs3.
54. Kanehisa M., Goto S., Sato Y., Furumichi M., Tanabe M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Research 2011, 40(Database issue):D109-D114.
55. Szklarczyk D., Franceschini A., Kuhn M., Simonovic M., Roth A., Minguez P., et al. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Research 2011, 39:D561-D568.
56. Aranda B., Achuthan P., Alam-Faruque Y., Armean I., Bridge A., Derow C., et al. The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010. Nucleic Acids Research 2009, 38:D525-D531.
57. Ceol A., Chatr Aryamontri A., Licata L., Peluso D., Briganti L., Perfetto L., et al. MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Research 2010, 38:D532-D539.
58. Miller M.L., Jensen L.J., Diella F., Jorgensen C., Tinti M., Li L., et al. Linear motif atlas for phosphorylation-dependent signaling. Science Signaling 2008, 1:ra2.
59. Xue Y., Ren J., Gao X., Jin C., Wen L., Yao X. GPS 2.0, a tool to predict kinase-specific phosphorylation sites in hierarchy. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2008, 7:1598-1608.
60. Linding R., Jensen L.J., Pasculescu A., Olhovsky M., Colwill K., Bork P., et al. NetworKIN: a resource for exploring cellular phosphorylation networks. Nucleic Acids Research 2008, 36:D695-D699.
61. Blume-Jensen P., Hunter T. Oncogenic kinase signalling. Nature 2001, 411:355-365.
62. Kolch W., Pitt A. Functional proteomics to dissect tyrosine kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer 2010, 10:618-629.
63. Hoffert J.D., Pisitkun T., Saeed F., Song J.H., Chou C.L., Knepper M.A. Dynamics of the G protein-coupled vasopressin V2 receptor signaling network revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2011, 11(2). M111.014613.
64. Radeff-Huang J., Seasholtz T.M., Matteo R.G., Brown J.H. G protein mediated signaling pathways in lysophospholipid induced cell proliferation and survival. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 2004, 92:949-966.
65. Schreiber T.B., Mausbacher N., Keri G., Cox J., Daub H. An integrated phosphoproteomics work flow reveals extensive network regulation in early lysophosphatidic acid signaling. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2010, 9:1047-1062.
66. O'Hayre M., Salanga C.L., Kipps T.J., Messmer D., Dorrestein P.C., Handel T.M. Elucidating the CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling network in chronic lymphocytic leukemia through phosphoproteomics analysis. PLoS One 2010, 5:e11716.
67. Wojcechowskyj J.A., Lee J.Y., Seeholzer S.H., Doms R.W. Quantitative phosphoproteomics of CXCL12 (SDF-1) signaling. PLoS One 2011, 6:e24918.
68. Christensen G.L., Kelstrup C.D., Lyngso C., Sarwar U., Bogebo R., Sheikh S.P., et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics dissection of seven-transmembrane receptor signaling using full and biased agonists. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2010, 9:1540-1553.
69. Xiao K., Sun J., Kim J., Rajagopal S., Zhai B., Villen J., et al. Global phosphorylation analysis of beta-arrestin-mediated signaling downstream of a seven transmembrane receptor (7TMR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107:15299-15304.
70. Kim J.E., White F.M. Quantitative analysis of phosphotyrosine signaling networks triggered by CD3 and CD28 costimulation in Jurkat cells. Journal of Immunology 2006, 176:2833-2843.
71. Mayya V., Lundgren D.H., Hwang S.I., Rezaul K., Wu L., Eng J.K., et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of T cell receptor signaling reveals system-wide modulation of protein-protein interactions. Science Signaling 2009, 2:ra46.
72. Navarro M.N., Goebel J., Feijoo-Carnero C., Morrice N., Cantrell D.A. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals an intrinsic pathway for the regulation of histone deacetylase 7 that controls the function of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Nature Immunology 2011, 12:352-361.
73. Rogers L.D., Brown N.F., Fang Y., Pelech S., Foster L.J. Phosphoproteomic analysis of Salmonella-infected cells identifies key kinase regulators and SopB-dependent host phosphorylation events. Science Signaling 2011, 4:rs9.
74. Daub H., Olsen J.V., Bairlein M., Gnad F., Oppermann F.S., Korner R., et al. Kinase-selective enrichment enables quantitative phosphoproteomics of the kinome across the cell cycle. Molecular Cell 2008, 31:438-448.
75. Dephoure N., Zhou C., Villen J., Beausoleil S.A., Bakalarski C.E., Elledge S.J., et al. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:10762-10767.
76. Lukas J., Lukas C., Bartek J. More than just a focus: the chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance. Nature Cell Biology 2011, 13:1161-1169.
77. Matsuoka S., Ballif B.A., Smogorzewska A., McDonald E.R., Hurov K.E., Luo J., et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316:1160-1166.
78. Bennetzen M.V., Larsen D.H., Bunkenborg J., Bartek J., Lukas J., Andersen J.S. Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics of the nuclear proteome during the DNA damage response. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2010, 9:1314-1323.
79. Bensimon A., Schmidt A., Ziv Y., Elkon R., Wang S.Y., Chen D.J., et al. ATM-dependent and -independent dynamics of the nuclear phosphoproteome after DNA damage. Science Signaling 2010, 3:rs3.
80. Pines A., Kelstrup C.D., Vrouwe M.G., Puigvert J.C., Typas D., Misovic B., et al. Global phosphoproteome profiling reveals unanticipated networks responsive to cisplatin treatment of embryonic stem cells. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2011, 31:4964-4977.
81. Todd R.C., Lippard S.J. Inhibition of transcription by platinum antitumor compounds. Metallomics 2009, 1:280-291.
82. Ying Q.L., Nichols J., Chambers I., Smith A. BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 2003, 115:281-292.
83. Chen G., Gulbranson D.R., Hou Z., Bolin J.M., Ruotti V., Probasco M.D., et al. Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture. Nature Methods 2011, 8:424-429.
84. Brumbaugh J., Rose C.M., Phanstiel D.H., Thomson J.A., Coon J.J. Proteomics and pluripotency. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2011, 46:493-506.
85. Ding V.M., Boersema P.J., Foong L.Y., Preisinger C., Koh G., Natarajan S., et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation profiling in FGF-2 stimulated human embryonic stem cells. PLoS One 2011, 6:e17538.
86. Prokhorova T.A., Rigbolt K.T., Johansen P.T., Henningsen J., Kratchmarova I., Kassem M., et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and quantitative comparison of the membrane proteomes of self-renewing and differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2009, 8:959-970.
87. Reiland S., Salekdeh G.H., Krijgsveld J. Defining pluripotent stem cells through quantitative proteomic analysis. Expert Review of Proteomics 2011, 8:29-42.
88. Kratchmarova I., Blagoev B., Haack-Sorensen M., Kassem M., Mann M. Mechanism of divergent growth factor effects in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science 2005, 308:1472-1477.
89. Appasani K., Appasani R.K., SpringerLink (Online service) Stem cells & regenerative medicine from molecular embryology to tissue engineering 2011, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, p. xxvii, 629 pp.
90. Thomson J.A., Itskovitz-Eldor J., Shapiro S.S., Waknitz M.A., Swiergiel J.J., Marshall V.S., et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998, 282:1145-1147.
91. Van Hoof D., Munoz J., Braam S.R., Pinkse M.W., Linding R., Heck A.J., et al. Phosphorylation dynamics during early differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:214-226.
92. Brill L.M., Xiong W., Lee K.B., Ficarro S.B., Crain A., Xu Y., et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis of human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:204-213.
93. Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126:663-676.
94. Phanstiel D.H., Brumbaugh J., Wenger C.D., Tian S., Probasco M.D., Bailey D.J., et al. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human ES and iPS cells. Nature Methods 2011, 8:821-827.
95. Dinkel H., Chica C., Via A., Gould C.M., Jensen L.J., Gibson T.J., et al. Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites - update 2011. Nucleic Acids Research 2011, 39:D261-D267.
96. Gnad F., Gunawardena J., Mann M. PHOSIDA 2011: the posttranslational modification database. Nucleic Acids Research 2011, 39:D253-D260.
97. Hornbeck P.V., Kornhauser J.M., Tkachev S., Zhang B., Skrzypek E., Murray B., et al. PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Research 2012, 40:D261-D270.
98. Akimov V., Rigbolt K.T., Nielsen M.M., Blagoev B. Characterization of ubiquitination dependent dynamics in growth factor receptor signaling by quantitative proteomics. Molecular BioSystems 2011, 7:3223-3233.
99. Grabbe C., Husnjak K., Dikic I. The spatial and temporal organization of ubiquitin networks. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2011, 12:295-307.
100. Kim W., Bennett E.J., Huttlin E.L., Guo A., Li J., Possemato A., et al. Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome. Molecular Cell 2011, 44:325-340.
101. Wagner S.A., Beli P., Weinert B.T., Nielsen M.L., Cox J., Mann M., et al. A proteome-wide, quantitative survey of in vivo ubiquitylation sites reveals widespread regulatory roles. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 2011, 10. M111.013284.