The effect of track changes on the development of academic self-concept in high school: A dynamic test of the big-fish-little-pond effect

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 793-805

  Wouters, Sofie ^a   De Fraine, Bieke ^a   Colpin, Hilde ^a   Van Damme, Jan ^a   Verschueren, Karine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Ability grouping; Academic self concept; Big fish little pond effect; High school; Tracking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868300727     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0027732     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bernier, A., Larose, S., Boivin, M., & Soucy, N. (2004). Attachment state of mind: Implications for adjustment to college. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 783-806. doi:10.1177/0743558403260096
2. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and selfefficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1-40. doi:10.1023/A:1021302408382
3. Byrne, B. M. (1988). Adolescent self-concept, ability grouping, and social comparison: Re-examining academic track differences in high school. Youth and Society, 20, 46-67. doi:10.1177/0044118X88020001003
4. Byrne, B. M. (1990). Self-concept and academic achievement: Investigating their importance as discriminators of academic track membership in high school. Canadian Journal of Education, 15, 173-182. doi:10.2307/1495374
5. Carbonaro, W. (2005). Tracking, students' effort, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 78, 27-49. doi:10.1177/003804070507800102
6. Cheung, C. K., & Rudowicz, E. (2003). Academic outcomes of ability grouping among junior high school students in Hong Kong. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 241-254. doi:10.1080/00220670309598813
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
8. Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., Martin, J. M., Peeke, L. G., Seroczynski, A. D., Tram, J. M.,...Maschman, J. (2001). The development of multiple domains of child and adolescent self-concept: A cohort sequential longitudinal design. Child Development, 72, 1723-1746. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00375
9. Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Print, M. (2000). Gifted, streamed, and mixed-ability programs for gifted students: Impact on self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Australian Journal of Education, 44, 51-75.
10. Dai, D. Y., & Rinn, A. N. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here? Educational Psychology Review, 20, 283-317. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9071-x
11. Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of theory of relative deprivation to career decisions for college men. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 17-31. doi:10.1086/224257
12. De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement: A multivariate multilevel latent growth approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 132-150. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.005
13. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental context during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 225-241. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x
14. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
15. Flemish Department of Education. (2008). Onderwijs in Vlaanderen: Een brede kijk op het Vlaamse onderwijslandschap [Education in Flanders: A broad view on the Flemish educational landscape]. Retrieved from http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/publicaties/eDocs/pdf/103.pdf
16. Fuligni, A. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (1995). The long-term effects of seventh-grade ability grouping in mathematics. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 58-89. doi:10.1177/0272431695015001005
17. Hallam, S., & Deathe, K. (2002). Ability grouping: Year group differences in self-concept and attitudes of secondary school pupils. Westminster Studies in Education, 25, 7-17.
18. Hallinan, M. T. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67, 79-84. doi:10.2307/2112697
19. Hattie, J. A. C. (2002). Classroom composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 449-481. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00015-6
20. Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2009). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
21. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2001). Ability grouping in education. London, England: Sage.
22. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2009). Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools. Learning and Instruction, 19, 201-213. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.001
23. Jansen, P. W. A., & Bruinsma, M. (2005). Explaining achievement in higher education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11, 235-252. doi:10.1080/13803610500101173
24. Kong, C. K., Hau, K. T., & Cheng, Z. J. (1998, April). Chinese students' self-concept and academic performance: Big-fish-little-pond-effects and the role of perceived school status. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
25. Lau, S. (1990). Crisis and vulnerability in adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 111-131. doi:10.1007/BF01538716
26. Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K. J., & Parkins, E. J. (2005). A longitudinal study of students' academic self-concept in a streamed setting: The Singapore context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 567-586. doi: 10.1348/000709905X42239
27. Lleras, C. (2008). Race, racial concentration, and the dynamics of educational inequality across urban and suburban school. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 886-912. doi:10.3102/0002831208316323
28. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Self-concept: The application of a frame of reference model to explain paradoxical results. Australian Journal of Education, 28, 165-181.
29. Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic selfconcept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280-295. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280
30. Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417-430. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.417
31. Marsh, H. W. (1991). Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students' ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445-480.
32. Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effect of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285-319.
33. Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (2005). A reciprocal effects model of the causal ordering of self-concept and achievement: New support for the benefits of enhancing self-concept. In H. W. Marsh, R. Craven, & D. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 2, pp. 17-51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
34. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364-376. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364
35. Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001). Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 321-350. doi:10.3102/00028312038002321
36. Marsh, H. W., Parker, J., & Barnes, J. (1985). Multidimensional adolescent self-concepts: Their relationship to age, sex, and academic measures. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 422-444.
37. Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O'Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6
38. Marsh, H. W., Tracey, D. K., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Multidimensional self-concept structure for preadolescents with mild intellectual disabilities. A hybrid multigroup-MIMC approach to factorial invariance and latent mean differences. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 795-818. doi:10.1177/0013164405285910
39. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). The big-fish-little-pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 631-669. doi:10.3102/0002831207306728
40. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Köller, O. (2008). Social comparison and big-fish-little-pond effects on self-concept and other self-belief constructs: Role of generalized and specific others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 510-524. doi:10.1037/00220663.100.3.510
41. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397-416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x
42. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. N. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes and meanings. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570-608). New York, NY: Macmillan.
43. Pinxten, M., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., & D'Haenens, E. (2010). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Effects of type of achievement measure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 689-709. doi:10.1348/000709910X493071
44. Rasbash, J., Browne, W. J., Healy, M., Cameron, B., & Charlton, C. (2010). MLwiN, Version 2.22. Bristol, England: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
45. Ross, C. M., & Harrison, P. L. (2006). Ability grouping. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children's needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 579-588). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
46. Salmela-Aro, K., Kiuru, N., & Nurmi, J. E. (2008). The role of educational track in adolescents' school burnout: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 663-689. doi:10.1348/000709908X281628
47. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-499.
49. Smet, P. (2010). Mensen doen schitteren. Eerste oriëntatienota hervorming secundair onderwijs [Make people shine. First orientation note on the reform of secondary education]. Retrieved from http://www.pascalsmet.be/media/uploads/notas/20100914_orienteringsnota_hervormingso.pdf
50. Stoel, W. (1980). De relatie tussen de grootte van scholen voor voortgezet onderwijs en het welbevinden van de leerlingen [The relationship between school size and well-being of pupils in secondary education]. Haren, the Netherlands: Research Institute for Education in the North (RION).
51. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788-806. doi:10.1037/00220663.98.4.788
52. Van Boxtel, H. W., & Mönks, F. J. (1992). General, social, and academic self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 169-186. doi:10.1007/BF01537335
53. Van Damme, J., De Fraine, B., Van Landeghem, G., Opdenakker, M., & Onghena, P. (2002). A new study on educational effectiveness in secondary schools in Flanders: An introduction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 383-397. doi:10.1076/sesi.13.4.383.10285
54. Van Houtte, M. (2005). Global self-esteem in technical/vocational versus general secondary school tracks: A matter of gender? Sex Roles, 53, 753-761. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7739-y
55. Van Houtte, M. (2009). De verschillen tussen onderwijsvormen: Een kwestie van culturen [The differences between educational tracks: A matter of cultures]. Caleidoscoop, 21, 25-30.
56. Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2009). Study involvement of academic and vocational students: Does between-school tracking sharpen the difference? American Educational Research Journal, 46, 943-973. doi:10.3102/0002831209348789
57. Wouters, S., Colpin, H., Germeijs, V., & Verschueren, K. (2009). Understanding the effect of being a big fish in a little pond on academic self-concept. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 89-101. doi: 10.1007/BF03080131
58. Wouters, S., Germeijs, V., Colpin, H., & Verschueren, K. (2011). Academic self-concept in high school: Predictors and effects on adjustment in higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 586-594. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00905.x