Explaining achievement in higher education

Educational Research and Evaluation

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 235-252

  Jansen, Ellen P W A ^a   Bruinsma, Marjon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944455167     PISSN: 13803611     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803610500101173     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bean, J.P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12, 155-187.
2. Bean, J.P., & Metzner, B.S. (1985). A conceptual model of non-traditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55, 485-540.
3. Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 151-161.
4. Beck, H.P., & Davidson, W.D. (2001). Establishing an early warning system: Predicting low grades in college students from survey of academic orientations scores. Research in Higher Education, 42, 709-723.
5. Beekhoven, S., De Jong, U., & Van Hout, H. (2003). Different courses, different students, same results? An examination of differences in study progress of students in different courses. Higher Education, 46, 37-59.
6. Berger, J.B., & Milem, J.F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40, 641-664.
7. Bijleveld, R.J. (1993). Numeriek rendement en studiestaking [Numerical returns and dropout]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente. Utrecht: Lemma.
8. Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
9. Centra, J. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Creemers, B.P.M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
11. De Jong, U., Roeleveld, J., & Webbink, H.D. (1997). Verder studeren in de jaren negentig. Studiekeuze en studieloopbaan over de periode 1991-1995 [Studying in the nineties. Choices and study careers 1991-1995]. The Hague: Sdu.
12. De Jong, U., Roeleveld, J., Webbink, H.D., & Verbeek, A.E. (1997). Het Amsterdamse schoolloopbaanmodel [The Amsterdam model for study careers]. The Hague: Sdu.
13. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., & Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1-38.
14. Feldman, K.A. (1989). The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Research in Higher Education, 30, 583-645.
15. Hinton, H. (1993). Reliability and validity of student evaluations: Testing models versus survey research models, PS: Political Science & Politics, 26, 562-569.
16. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural-Equation-Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
17. Jansen, E.P.W.A. (1993a). Curriculum organization and study progress. In Th. H. Joostens, G.W.H. Heijnen, & A. Heevel (Eds.), Doability of curricula (pp. 135-149). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
18. Jansen, E.P.W.A. (1993b). Educational programming related to study-progress. In J.K. Koppen & W.D. Webler (Eds.), Strategies for increasing access and performance in higher education (pp. 121-129). Amsterdam: Thesis.
19. Jansen, E.P.W.A. (1996). Curriculumorganisatie en studievoortgang [Curriculum organization and study progress]. Doctoral Dissertation. Groningen, The Netherlands: GION.
20. Jansen, E.P.W.A. (2004). The influence of the curriculum organization on study progress in higher education. Higher Education, 47(4), 411-435.
21. Jansen, E.P.W.A., & Bruinsma, M. (2002). Student ratings and measurement of study behaviour in a model for explaining study progress. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans [On-line]. Available: http://www.cowog.nl/homepage/ publications/aeraellenmarjon.PDF.
22. Kekäle, J. (1999). "Preferred" patterns of academic leadership in different disciplinary (sub)cultures. Higher Education, 37, 217-238.
23. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Lonka, K. (1999). Individual ways of interacting with the learning environment - are they related to study success? Learning and Instruction, 9, 1-18.
24. Lizzio, A.K., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27-52.
25. Macan, T., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R.L., & Phillips, A. (1990). College students' time management: correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 760-768.
26. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The Experience of learning (pp. 39-58). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic press.
27. McKeachie, W. (1997). Student ratings, the validity of use, American Psychologist, 52, 1218-1225.
28. Need, A., & De Jong, U. (1998, April). De invloed van opleiding op studieresultaten en studieuitval na één jaar studeren in het hoger onderwijs [The influence of the department on achievement en drop out after one year of study in higher education]. Paper presented at the Sociaal Wetenschappelijke Studiedagen, Amsterdam.
29. Pascarella, E.T. (1980). Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50, 545-575.
30. Perry, R.P. (1997). Perceived control in college students: Implications for instruction in higher education. In R.P. Perry & J.C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 11-60). New York: Agathon Press.
31. Prins, J. (1997). Studieuitval in het wetenschappelijk onderwijs. Studentkenmerken en opleidingskenmerken als verklaring voor studieuitval [Drop out in university education. Student characteristics and educational characteristics as explanatory factors]. Doctoral Dissertation. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: University Press.
32. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
33. Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N.J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 151-164.
34. Richardson, J.T.E. (2000). Researching student learning. Approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.
35. Richardson, J.T.E, & Woodley, A. (2003). Another look at the role of age, gender and subject as predictors of academic attainment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 475-493.
36. Schouwenburg, H.C. (1996). Handleiding bij de VSP'94 [Manual for the Test for Study Problems]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Studie Ondersteuning.
37. Schouwenburg, H.C., & Schilder, A.J.E. (1996). Handleiding bij de Test voor Diepgaande LeerstofVerwerking DLV'95 [Manual for the Test for Deep Information Processing]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Studie Ondersteuning.
38. Schouwenburg, H.C., & Stevens, I.L. (1996). De Checklist StudieMotivatie CSM'96 [The Checklist for Study Motivation]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Studie Ondersteuning.
39. Shah, C., & Burke, G. (1999). An undergraduate students' flow model: Australian higher education. Higher Education, 37, 359-375.
40. Simonite, V. (2003). A longitudinal study of achievement in a modular first degree course. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 293-302.
41. Slotte, V., Lonka, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2001). Study-strategy use in learning from text. Does gender make a difference? Instructional Science, 29, 255-272.
42. Smith, J., & Naylor, R. (2001). Determinants of degree performance in UK universities: A statistical analysis of the 1993 student cohort. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 29-60.
43. Spady, W. (1971). Dropouts from higher education: Toward an empirical model. Interchange, 2(3), 38-62.
44. Stumpf, S.A., & Friedman, R.D. (1979). Expected grade covariation with student ratings of instruction: Individual versus class effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 293-302.
45. Terenzini, P. (1999). Research and practice in undergraduate education: And ever the twain shall meet? Higher Education, 38, 33-48.
46. Tinto, V. (1975). Drop-out from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125.
47. Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
48. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influences of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251-266.
49. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2003). Qualitative difference in university teaching. In M. Tight (Ed.), Access and exclusion international perspectives on higher education research (Vol. 2, pp. 185-216). Oxford: Elseviers Science.
50. Van den Berg, M.N. (2002). Studeren? (g)een punt! Een kwantitatieve studie naar studievoortgang in het Nederlandse wetenschappelijk onderwijs in de periode 1996-2000 [A quantitative study of study progress in Dutch university education, 1996-2000]. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
51. Van der Drift, K.D.J.M., & Vos, P. (1987). Anatomie van een leeromgeving. Een onderwijseconomische analyse van het universitaire onderwijs [Anatomy of a learning environment. An educational economic analysis of higher education]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
52. Van der Hulst, M., & Jansen, E.P.W.A. (2002). Effects of curriculum organisation on study progress in engineering studies. Higher Education, 43, 489-506.
53. Vermunt, J.D.H.M. (1992). Leerstijlen en sturen van leerprocessen in hoger onderwijs. Naar procesgerichte instructie en zelfstandig denken [Learning styles and regulation of the learning processes in higher education]. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.