Understanding the effect of being a big fish in a little pond on academic self-concept

Netherlands Journal of Psychology

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 89-101

  Wouters, Sofie ^a   Colpin, Hilde ^a   Germeijs, Veerle ^a   Verschueren, Karine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Academic self concept; Achievement; Big fish little pond effect; Multidimensional self concept; Tracking

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955893529     PISSN: 1872552X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03080131     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Ainscow, M., & César,M. (2006). Inclusive education ten years after Salamanca: Setting the agenda. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 231-238. (Pubitemid 44826160)
2. Bong,M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic selfconcept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1-40. (Pubitemid 38103661)
3. Brewer,M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different and the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
4. Brewer,M. B., &Weber, J.G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 268-275.
5. Brookover,W. B. (1989,March). Self-concept of ability scale-a review and further analysis. Paper presented at the annualmeeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
6. Burleson, K., Leach, C.W., & Harrington,D. M. (2005). Upward social comparison and selfconcept: Inspiration and inferiority among art students in an advanced programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 109-123.
7. Byrne, B. M. (1988). Adolescent self-concept, ability grouping, and social comparison: Re-examining academic track differences in high school. Youth and Society, 20, 46-67.
8. Chapman, J.W. (1988). Learning disabled children's self-concepts. Review of Educational Research, 58, 347-371.
9. Cheng, R.W., & Lam, S. (2007). Self-construal and social comparison effects. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 197-211.
10. Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A.,Walker,M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375.
11. Cole, C. M.,Waldron,N., & Majd,M. (2004).Academic progress of students across inclusive and traditional settings. Mental Retardation, 42, 136-144. (Pubitemid 38515520)
12. Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on selfevaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 51-69. (Pubitemid 126021386)
13. Craven, R.G., Marsh,H.W., & Print,M. (2000). Gifted, streamed andmixed-ability programs for gifted students: Impact on self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Australian Journal of Education, 44, 51-75.
14. Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L., & Bouvrette, A. (2003). Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894-908. (Pubitemid 37417549)
15. Dai,D. Y., & Rinn, A.N. (2008). The big-fish-littlepond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here? Educational Psychology Review, 20, 283-317.
16. Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of theory of relative deprivation to career decisions for college men. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 17-31.
17. Derks, B. (2007). Social identity threat and performance motivation: The interplay between ingroup and outgroup domains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
18. Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers,N. (2007). Social creativity strikes back: Improving low status group members' motivation and performance by valuing ingroup dimensions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 470-493.
19. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. In: M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31-49).New York: Plenum Press.
20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. (Pubitemid 33216305)
21. Dickhäuser, O., Reuter,M., & Hilling, C. (2005). Coursework selection: A frame of reference approach using structural equation modelling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 673-688. (Pubitemid 41756145)
22. Dickhäuser, O., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2003). Perceived teachers' ability evaluations and boys' and girls' concepts of theirmathematical ability in elementary school. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 50, 182-190. (Pubitemid 36471006)
23. Dijker, A. J.M. (2007).Why Barbie feels heavier than Ken: The influence of size-based expectancies and social cues on the illusory perception of weight. Cognition, 106, 1109-1125. (Pubitemid 351172228)
24. Dunn, L. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Ismuch of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 34, 5-22.
25. Festinger, L. (1954).A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
26. Freeman, S. F.N., & Alkin,M. C. (2000).Academic and social attainments of children with mental retardation in general education and special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 3-26.
27. Gardner,W. L., Gabriel, S., & Hochschild, L. (2002). When you and I are "we", you are not threatening: The role of self-expansion in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 239-251.
28. Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A life-span perspective. In: R. J. Steinberg, & J. Kolligan (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 67-97).New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Harter, S. (1998). The development of selfrepresentations. In:W. Damon (Chief ed.), & N. Eisenberg (Volume ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 553-617).New York:Wiley.
30. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.
31. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2001). Ability grouping in education. London: Paul Chapman.
32. Jansen,D. L., & Vonk, R. (2005). Contingente zelfwaardering: Betrouwbaarheid en validiteit van de Nederlandse globale en domeinspecifieke contingentieschaal. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 60, 1-14.
33. Jerusalem,M. (1984). Reference group, learning environment and self-evaluations: A dynamic multi-level analysis with latent variables. In: R. Schwarzer (Ed.), The self in anxiety, stress and depression (pp. 61-73).Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34. Kemmelmeier,M., & Oyserman,D. (2001). The ups and downs of thinking about a successful other: Self-construals and the consequences of social comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 311-320.
35. Kernis,M.H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26. (Pubitemid 36963860)
36. Koch, E. J. (2006). Examining the role of selfesteem in psychological functioning and wellbeing. In:M.H. Kernis (Ed.), Self-esteem: Issues and answers. A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 260-266).New York: Psychology Press.
37. Kulik, C. L. (1985, August). Effects of inter-class ability grouping on achievement and self-esteem. Paper presented at the annualmeeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
38. Lau, S. (1990). Crisis and vulnerability in adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 111-131. (Pubitemid 20313745)
39. Leflot, G., Onghena, P., & Colpin, H. (2009). Teacherchild interactions. Relations with children's self-concept in second grade. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40. Levine, J.M., &Moreland, R. L. (1987). Social comparison and outcome evaluation in group contexts. In: J. C. Masters &W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical, and policy perspectives (pp. 105-127). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Link, B. G. (1987).Understanding labelling effects in the area of mental disorders: An empirical assessment of the effects of expectations of rejection. American Sociological Review, 52, 96-112.
42. Liu,W. C.,Wang, C. K. J., & Parkins, E. J. (2005).A longitudinal study of students' academic selfconcept in a streamed setting: The Singapore context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 567-586. (Pubitemid 41756139)
43. Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 91-103.
44. Major, B., Testa, M. & Bylsma,W.H. (1991). Responses to upward and downward social comparisons: The impact of esteem-relevance and perceived control. In: J. Suls & T.A.Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 237-260).Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Mand, J. (2007). Social position of special needs pupils in the classroom: A comparison between German special schools for pupils with learning difficulties and integrated primary school classes. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22, 7-14. (Pubitemid 46964943)
46. Manning,M.A., Bear, G.G., &Minke, K.M. (2006). Self-concept and self-esteem. I: G.G. Bear & K.M. Minke (Eds.), Children's needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 341-356). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
47. Markowitz, F. E. (1998). The effects of stigma on the psychological well-being and life satisfaction of persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 335-347. (Pubitemid 128453805)
48. Marsh,H.W. (1984). Self-concept, social comparison and ability grouping: A reply to Kulik and Kulik. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 799-806.
49. Marsh,H.W. (1986). Verbal andmath self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research, 23, 129-149.
50. Marsh,H.W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 228-295.
51. Marsh,H.W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417-430.
52. Marsh,H.W. (1991). Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students' ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445-480.
53. Marsh,H.W., Chessor,D., Craven, R.G., & Roche, L. (1995). The effect of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285-319.
54. Marsh,H.W., Craven, R.G., & McInerney. (Eds.). (2005). International advances in self research: New frontiers for self research (Vol.2). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
55. Marsh,H.W., & Hau, K. (2003). Big-fish-littlepond effect on academic self-concept.A crosscultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364-376. (Pubitemid 37189511)
56. Marsh,H.W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001). Reunification of East andWest German school systems: Longitudinalmultilevel modelling study of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic selfconcept. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 321-350.
57. Marsh,H.W., Kong, C. K., & Hau, K. T. (2000). Longitudinalmultilevel models of the big-fish-littlepond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 337-349.
58. Marsh,H.W., & Parker, J.W. (1984).Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213-231.
59. Marsh,H.W., Parker, J., & Barnes, J. (1985). Multidimensional adolescent self-concepts: Their relationship to age, sex, and academic measures. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 422-444.
60. Marsh,H.W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). The negative effects of school-average ability on academic selfconcept: An application of multilevel modelling. Australian Journal of Education, 40, 65-87.
61. Marsh,H.W., Seaton, M., Trautwein,U., Lüdtke, O.,Hau, K. T., O'Mara, A. J., & Craven, R.G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350.
62. Marsh,H.W., Tracey,D. K., & Craven, R.G. (2006). Multidimensional self-concept structure for preadolescents with mild intellectual disabilities.A hybrid multigroup -MIMC approach to factorial invariance and latentmean differences. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 66, 795-818. (Pubitemid 44300880)
63. Marsh,H.W., Trautwein,U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). The big-fish-little-pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 631-669.
64. Marsh,H.W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691-720.
65. Martin, A. J.,Marsh,H.W., Debus, R. L., &Malmberg, L. E. (2008). Performance andmastery orientation of high school and university/college students - A Rasch perspective. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 68, 464-487.
66. McFarland, C., & Buehler, R. (1995). Collective selfesteem as amoderator of the frog-pond-effect in reaction to performance feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1055-1070.
67. Mullen, B. (1991). Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations. The phenomenology of being in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 297-323.
68. Muys, R.D. (1997). Self, school, and media: A longitudinal study of media use, self-concept, school achievement and peer relations among primary school children. Leuven: Department Communicatiewetenschap K.U. Leuven.
69. Nakken, H., & Pijl, S. J. (2002).Getting along with classmates in regular schools: A review of the effects of integration on the development of social relationships. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6, 47-61.
70. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R.N. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes and meanings. In: P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570-608). New York: Macmillan.
71. Pleban, R., & Tesser, A. (1981). The effects of relevance and quality of another's performance on interpersonal closeness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 278-285.
72. Pomerantz, E. M., Ruble,D.N., Frey, K. S., & Greulich, F. (1995). Meeting goals and confronting conflict: Children's changing perceptions of social comparison. Child Development, 66, 723-738.
73. Renick,M. J., & Harter, S. (1989). Impact of social comparisons on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 631-638.
74. Reuman,D.A. (1989).How social comparisonmediates the relation between ability-grouping practices and students' achievement expectancies in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 178-189.
75. Robinson,N. M., Zigler, E., & Gallagher, J. J. (2002). Two tails of the normal curve: Similarities and differences in the study of mental retardation and giftedness. American Psychologist, 55, 1413-1424.
76. Rogers, C.M., Smith, M.D., & Coleman, J.M. (1978). Social comparison in the classroom: The relationship between academic achievement and self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 50-57.
77. Rosenberg,M. (1979). Conceiving the self.New York: Basic Books.
78. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Holt.
79. Ross, C. M., & Harrison, P. L. (2006).Ability grouping. In:G. G. Bear&K.M.Minke (Eds.), Children's needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 579-588). Bethesda,MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
80. Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem, J., & Lange, B. (1983, April). The change of self-concept with respect to reference groups in school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
81. Seaton, M.,Marsh,H.W., Dumas, F.,Huguet, P., Monteil, J. M., Regner, I., et al. (2008). In search of the big fish: Investigating the coexistence of the big-fish-little-pond effect with the positive effects of upward comparisons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 73-103.
82. Shavelson, R. J.,Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
83. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents andmotives on well-being: It's both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 475-486. (Pubitemid 38422601)
84. Simon, B. (1992). The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: Reintroducing the social context. In:W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1-30). New York:Wiley.
85. Slavin, R. E. (1990).Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-499.
86. Snyder, C. R.,Higgins, R. L., & Stucky, R. J. (1983). Excuses: Masquerades in search of grace.New York: Wiley-Interscience.
87. Solomon, S. (2006). Self-esteem is central to human well-being. In: M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Selfesteem: Issues and answers.A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 254-259).New York: Psychology Press.
88. Stapel, D. A, & Koomen,W. I. (2001).We, and the effects of others on me: How self-construal level moderates social comparison effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 766-781. (Pubitemid 33594891)
89. Strang, L., Smith,M.D., & Rogers, C.M. (1978). Social comparison, multiple reference groups and the self-concepts of academically handicapped children before and after mainstreaming. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 487-497.
90. Tajfel,H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: S.Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
91. Testa, M., & Major, B. (1990). The impact of social comparisons after failure: The moderating effects of perceived control. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 205-218.
92. Trautwein,U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh,H.W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grademathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788-806. (Pubitemid 44747839)
93. Verschueren, K., & Gadeyne, E. (2007). Zelfconcept. In: K. Verschueren & H. Koomen (Eds.), Handboek diagnostiek in de leerlingenbegeleiding (pp. 151-168). Antwerpen: Garant.
94. Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.
95. Wu, C., Chang,M., & Huang, Y. (2006, April). Revisit reference group theory of the big-fish-little-pond. Paper presented at the International Sunbelt Social Network Conference XXVI. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
96. Zeleke, S. (2004). Self-concepts of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers: A review. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19, 145-170. (Pubitemid 38678680)