Methodological reflections: Designing and understanding computer-supported collaborative learning

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 603-614

  Hämäläinen, Raija ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

collaboration macro scripts; collaborative learning; distributed learning environment; qualitative methodologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868225721     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2012.658556     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arvaja, M. 2007. Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2/3): 133-58.
2. Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P. and Järvelä, S. 2007. Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17(4): 448-59.
3. Berelson, B. 1952. Content analysis in communication research, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
4. Chi, M. 1997. Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3): 271-315.
5. Collins, A. 1999. "The changing infrastructure of education research". In Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities, Edited by: Lagemann, E.C. and Shulman, L.S. 289-98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. De Laat, M. and Lally, V. 2004. It's not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3): 165-71.
7. De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T. and Valcke, M. 2010. Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: Comparing scripting by assigning roles with regulation by cross-age peer tutors. Learning and Instruction, 20(5): 349-60.
8. Dillenbourg, P. and Jermann, P. 2006. "Designing integrative scripts". In Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives, Edited by: Fischer, F., Mandl, H., Haake, J. and Kollar, I. 275-301. New York, NY: Springer.
9. Dillenbourg, P., and P. Jermann. 2010. Technology for classroom orchestration. In New science of learning, M.S. Khine and I.M. Saleh, 525-52. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_26
10. Dillenbourg, P. and Tchounikine, P. 2007. Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1): 1-13.
11. Dillenbourg, P., S. Järvelä, and F. Fischer. 2009. The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In Technology-enhanced learning principles and products, N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder and S. Barnes, 3-19. doi:Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7.
12. Hämäläinen, R. 2011. Using a game environment to foster collaborative learning: A design-based study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1): 61-78.
13. Hämäläinen, R. and Häkkinen, P. 2010. Teachers' instructional planning for computer-supported collaborative learning: Macro-scripts as a pedagogical method to facilitate collaborative learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4): 871-77.
14. Hökkä, P., Rasku-Puttonen, H. and Eteläpelto, A. 2008. "Teacher educators' workplace learning. The interdependency between individual agency and social context". In Emerging perspectives of workplace learning, Edited by: Billett, S., Harteis, C. and Eteläpelto, A. 51-65. Rotterdam: Sense.
15. Jahnke, I. 2010. Dynamics of social roles in a knowledge management community. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4): 533-46.
16. Jeong, H. and Hmelo-Silver, C.E. 2010. Productive use of learning resources in an online problem-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1): 84-99.
17. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P. and Fischer, F. 2007. Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2/3): 211-24.
18. Kollar, I., Fischer, F. and Slotta, J.D. 2007. Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(6): 708-21.
19. Kollar, I., Hämäläinen, R., Evans, M., Wever, B. and Perrotta, C. 2011. "Orchestrating CSCL-More than a metaphor?". In Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 conference proceedings. Volume II, Edited by: Spada, H., Stahl, G., Miyake, N. and Law, N. 946-7. Hong Kong: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
20. Kopp, B. and Mandl, H. 2011. Fostering argument justification using collaboration scripts and content schemes. Learning and Instruction, 21(5): 636-49.
21. Koschmann, T. 1996. CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm, Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
22. Kumpulainen, K. and Mutanen, M. 1999. The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9(5): 449-73.
23. Mercer, N. and Littleton, K. 2007. Dialogue and the development of children's thinking. A sociocultural approach, London: Routledge.
24. Sarja, A. and Janhonen, S. 2009. Methodological reflections: Supervisory discourses and practice-based learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(6): 619-630.
25. Strijbos, J.W. and De Laat, M.F. 2010. Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4): 495-505.
26. Vass, E. and Littleton, K. 2009. "Analyzing role distribution in children's computer-mediated collaborative creative writing". In Investigating classroom interaction. Theories in action, Edited by: Kumpulainen, K., Hmelo-Silver, C. and Cesar, M. 99-120. Rotterdam: Sense.
27. Voogt, J. 2008. "IT and curriculum processes: Dilemmas and challenges". In International handbook of information technology, Edited by: Voogt, J. and Knezek, G. 117-32. New York, NY: Springer.
28. Wang, F. and Hannafin, M.J. 2005. Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4): 5-23.