Focus and Standardization of Sustainability Reporting - A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and Finland

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 455-474

  Fifka, Matthias S ^a,b   Drabble, Maria ^c  

^a Université libre de Bruxelles   (Germany)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Finland; Global Reporting Initiative; Reporting standard; Sustainability reporting; Sustainable development; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

CULTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; ENVIRONMENTALISM; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; STANDARDIZATION; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

FINLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84867986876     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1730     Document Type: Article

References (127)

1. Abeer H, Essam I. 2012. Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure: Factors Influencing Companies' Success in Attaining Environmental Awards. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 19(1): 32-46.
2. Adams CA. 2002. Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorizing. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(7): 223-250.
3. Adams CA, Harte GF. 1998. The changing portrayal of the employment of women in British banks' and retail companies' corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(8): 781-812.
4. Adams CA, Hill WY, Roberts CB. 1998. Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behaviour. British Accounting Review 30(1): 1-21.
5. Adams CA, Kuasirikun N. 2000. A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies. European Accounting Review 9(1): 53-79.
6. Alciatore ML, Dee CC, Freedman M, Jaggi B. 2006. Environmental disclosures in the oil and gas industry. In Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, Vol. 3, Freedman M, Jaggi B (eds). JAI Press: Amsterdam; 49-75.
7. Alniacik U, Alniacik E, Genc N. 2011. How corporate social responsibility information influences stakeholders' intentions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18(4): 234-245.
8. Andersen TM, Holmström B, Honkapohja S, Korkman S, Södeström HT, Vartiainen J. 2007. The Nordic Model - Embracing Globalization and Sharing Risks. Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy.
9. Arts W, Gelissen J. 2006. Three worlds of welfare capitalism. In The Welfare State Reader, Pierson C, Castles FG (eds). Polity: Cambridge; 175-197.
10. Babbie ER. 2010. The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA.
11. Bartolomeo M, Bennett M, Bouma JJ, Heydkamp P, James P, Wolters T. 2000. Environmental management accounting in Europe: current practice and future potential. European Accounting Review 9(1): 31-52.
12. Birkin F, Jorgensen HB. 1994. Tales in two countries: an insight into corporate environmental reporting in Denmark and the UK. Business Strategy and the Environment 3(3): 10-15.
13. Boiral O, Gendron Y. 2010. Sustainable development and certification practices: lessons learned and prospects. Business Strategy and the Environment 20(5): 331-347.
14. Borga FA, Citterio A, Noci G, Pizzurno E. 2009. Sustainability report in small enterprises: case studies in Italian furniture companies. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(3): 162-176.
15. Brammer S, Pavelin S. 2004. Voluntary social disclosures by large UK companies. Business Ethics: a European Review 13(2/3): 86-99.
16. Brammer S, Pavelin S. 2008. Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment 17: 120-136.
17. Buhr N, Freedman M. 2001. Institutional factors and differences in environmental disclosure between Canada and the United States. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12(3): 293-322.
18. Campbell D. 2003. Intra- and intersectoral effects in environmental disclosures: evidence for legitimacy theory? Business Strategy and the Environment 12(6): 357-371.
19. Campbell D, Craven B, Shrives P. 2003. Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: a comment on perception and legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 16(4): 558-581.
20. Cerin P 2002. Characteristics of environmental reporters on the OM Stockholm exchange. Business Strategy and the Environment 11(5): 298-311.
21. Chan JH, Welford R. 2005. Assessing corporate environmental risk in China: an evaluation of reporting activities of Hong Kong listed enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12: 88-104.
22. Chapple W, Moon J. 2005. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business and Society 44(4): 415-441.
23. Chen S, Bouvain P. 2009. Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics 87: 299-317.
24. Collison D, Lorraine N, Power D. 2003. An exploration of corporate attitudes to the significance of environmental information for stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10(4): 199-211.
25. Commission of the European Communities. 2006. Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0136:FIN:en:PDF [2 June 2011].
26. Cormier D, Gordon IM, Magnan M. 2004. Corporate environmental disclosure: contrasting management's perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics 49(2): 143-165.
27. Crespy CT, Miller VV. 2011. Sustainability reporting: a comparative study of NGOs and MNCs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18(5): 275-284.
28. Da Silva Monteiro SM, Aibar-Guzmán B. 2010. Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 185-204.
29. Davis-Walling P, Batterman SA. 1997. Environmental reporting and the Fortune 50 firms. Environmental Management 21(6): 865-875.
30. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. 2006. Environmental Reporting Guidelines - Key Performance Indicators June 2003. http://www.defra.gov.uk/publications/files/pb11321-envkpi-guidelines-060121.pdf [November 12, 2010].
31. Elkington J. 1997. Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone: Oxford.
32. Esping-Andersen G. 2006. Three worlds of welfare capitalism. In The Welfare State Reader, Pierson C, Castles FG (eds). Polity: Cambridge; 160-174.
33. European Commission. 2008. Standard Eurobarometer 69 - 3. Europeans' State of Mind. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb69/eb69_part1_en.pdf [March 17, 2011].
34. European Sustainability Reporting Association. 2009. The State of Sustainability Reporting in Europe: Commission Statement. http://www.sustainablereporting.eu/perspectives/ec_2008_report [4 June 2001].
35. European Union. 2003. Directive 2003/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 18 June 2003. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:178:0016:0022:en:PDF [November 10, 2010].
36. Fifka M. 2011. Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective - a review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.729
37. Gallego I. 2006. The use of economic, social and environmental indicators as a measure of sustainable development in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13(2): 78-97.
38. Gray R. 2001. Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: what (if anything) have we learnt? Business Ethics: a European Review 10(1): 9-15.
39. Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2): 47-77.
40. Gray R, Owen D, Maunders K. 1987. Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting and Accountability. Prentice-Hall: London.
41. Gray SJ, Radebaugh LH, Roberts CB. 1990. International perceptions of cost constraints on voluntary information disclosures: a comparative study of U.K. and U.S. multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies 21(4): 597-622.
42. Guthrie J, Parker LD. 1990. Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3: 159-176.
43. Haddock J. 2005. Consumer influence on internet-based corporate communication of environmental activities: the UK food sector. British Food Journal 107(10): 792-805.
44. Haddock-Fraser J, Fraser I. 2008. Assessing corporate environmental reporting motivations: differences between 'close-to-market' and 'business-to-business' companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15: 140-155.
45. Haddock-Fraser J, Tourelle M. 2010. Corporate motivations for environmental sustainable development: exploring the role of consumers in stakeholder engagement. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(8): 527-542.
46. Hall PA, Soskice D. 2003. Varieties of Capitalism: the Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press: New York.
47. Hall PA, Soskice D. 2009. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In Debating Varieties of Capitalism: a Reader, Hancké B (ed.). Oxford University Press: New York; 21-74.
48. Halme M, Huse M. 1997. The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management 13(2): 137-157.
49. Hanton B, Marrison V. 2010. United Kingdom. In: The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Corporate Governance 2010, A practical insight to cross-border Corporate Governance, Global Legal Group (eds). London: Global Legal Group, 130-137.
50. Hartman LP, Rubin RS, Dhanda KK. 2007. The communication of corporate social responsibility: United States and European Union multinational corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 74(4): 373-389.
51. Hedberg CJ, von Malmborg F. 2003. The Global Reporting Initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10(3): 153-164.
52. HM Treasury. 2010. Sustainability and environmental reporting. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/frem_sustainability.htm [March 13, 2011].
53. Hofstede G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2nd edn). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
54. Holder-Webb L, Cohen JR, Nath L, Wood D. 2009. The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics 84: 497-527.
55. Holland L, Foo YB. 2003. Differences in environmental reporting practices in the UK and the US: the legal and regulatory context. The British Accounting Review 35(1): 1-18.
56. Idowu SO. 2009. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility, Idowu SO, Filho W (eds). Springer: Berlin; 11-36.
57. International Monetary Fund. 2010. World Economic Outlook Database. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/02/weodata/index.aspx [June 16, 2011].
58. Ipsos MORI. 2010. Corporate Responsibility Attitudes of the British Public - Ethics in Business. Ipsos MORI: London.
59. Jansson M, Biel A. 2011. Motives to engage in sustainable investment: a comparison between institutional and private investors. Sustainable Development 19(2): 135-142.
60. Keskuskauppakamari. 2003. Yritysten Yhteiskuntavastuu. Keskuskauppakamari: Helsinki.
61. Kolk A. 2003. Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment 12(5): 279-291.
62. Kolk A. 2004. A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 3(1): 51-64.
63. Kolk A. 2005. Environmental reporting by multinationals from the triad: convergence or divergence? Management International Review 45: 145-166.
64. Kolk A. 2008. Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals' reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment 17(1): 1-15.
65. Kolk A, Perego P. 2010. Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: an international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment 19: 182-198.
66. Kolk A, Walhain S, van de Wateringen S. 2001. Environmental reporting by the Fortune Global 250: exploring the influence of nationality and sector. Business Strategy and the Environment 10: 15-28.
67. Korhonen J, Seppälä N. 2005. The strength of a high-trust society. In Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe, Habisch A, Jonker J, Wegner M, Schmidpeter R (eds). Springer: Heidelberg; 13-22.
68. KPMG. 2008. International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008. KPMG: Amsterdam.
69. KPMG. 2011. International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2011. KPMG: Amsterdam.
70. Llena F, Moneva JM, Hernandez B. 2007. Environmental disclosures and compulsory accounting standards: the case of Spanish annual reports. Business Strategy and the Environment 16(1): 50-63.
71. Lober D, Bynum JD, Campbell E, Jacques M. 1997. The 100 plus corporate environmental report study: A survey of an evolving environmental management tool. Business Strategy and the Environment 6(2): 57-73.
72. Luna Sotorrío L, Fernández Sánchez JL. 2010. Corporate social reporting for different audiences: the case of multinational corporations in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 272-283.
73. Maignan I, Ralston DA. 2002. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: insights from businesses' self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies 33(3): 497-514.
74. Maltby J. 2004. Hadfields Ltd: its annual general meetings 1903-1939 and their relevance for contemporary corporate social reporting. The British Accounting Review 36(4): 415-439.
75. Martin AD, Hadley DJ. 2008. Corporate environmental non-reporting - a UK FTSE 350 perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment 17(4): 249-259.
76. McMurtrie T. 2005. Factors influencing the publication of social performance information: an Australian case study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12(3): 129-143.
77. Meek G, Roberts CB, Gray SJ. 2005. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by U.S., U.K. and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26(3): 555-572.
78. Mitchell CG, Hill T. 2009. Corporate social and environmental reporting and the impact of internal environmental policy in South Africa. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 48-60.
79. Moon J. 2004. Government as a driver of corporate social responsibility. No. 20-2004 ICCSR Research Paper Series. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility.
80. Moon J. 2005. United Kingdom - An Explicit Model of Business-Society Relations. In: Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe, Habisch A, Jonker J, Wegner M, Schmidpeter R (eds). Springer: Berlin, 61-65.
81. Moore G. 2001. Corporate social and financial performance: an investigation in the U.K. supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics 34(3/4): 299-315.
82. Morhardt JE. 2010. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the internet. Business Strategy and the Environment 19: 436-452.
83. Morhardt JE, Baird S, Freeman K. 2002. Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031, and other criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9: 215-233.
84. MORI. 2000. The First Ever European Survey of Consumers' Attitudes Towards Corporate Social Responsibility. MORI: London.
85. Niskala M, Pretes M. 1995. Environmental reporting in Finland: a note on the use of annual reports. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 20(6): 457-466.
86. Niskanen J, Nieminen T. 2001. The objectivity of corporate environmental reporting: a study of Finnish listed firms' environmental disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment 10(1): 29-37.
87. Noci G. 2000. Environmental reporting in Italy: current practice and future developments. Business Strategy and the Environment 9: 211-223.
88. Nyquist S. 2003. The legislation of environmental disclosures in three Nordic countries - a comparison. Business Strategy and the Environment 12: 12-25.
89. O'Dwyer B. 2003. The ponderous evolution of corporate environmental reporting in Ireland. Recent evidence from publicly listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10(2): 91-100.
90. Oktem U, Lewis P, Donovan D, Hagan JR, Pace T. 2004. MS and sustainable development: a model and comparative studies of integration. Greener Management International 46: 11-28.
91. Othman R, Ameer R. 2010. Environmental disclosures of palm oil plantation companies in Malaysia: a tool for stakeholder engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 52-62.
92. Owen D. 2008. Chronicles of Wasted Time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21(2): 240-267.
93. Panapanaan V, Linnanen L. 2009. Finland. In Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility, Idowu SO, Filho W (eds). Springer: Berlin; 73-102.
94. Perrini F, Tencati A. 2006. Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the Environment 15: 296-308.
95. Pollach I, Scharl A, Weichselbraun A. 2009. Web content mining for comparing corporate and third-party online reporting: a case study on solid waste management. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(3): 137-148.
96. Prado-Lorenzo JM, Gallego-Alvarez I, Garcia-Sanchez IM. 2009. Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16(2): 94-107.
97. Ranta T. 1994. Marketing as a means of solving environmental problems. Marketing: Its Dynamics and Challenges. Proceedings of the 23rd European Marketing Academy Conference, Bloemer J, Lemmink J, Kasper H (eds). Maastricht; 805-818.
98. Rao P, Singh AK, la O' CO, Intal PSJ, Sajid A. 2009. A metric for corporate environmental indicators... for small and medium enterprises in the Philippines. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(1): 14-31.
99. Roberts CB. 1991. Environmental disclosures: a note on reporting practices in mainland Europe. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 4: 62-71.
100. Robertson DC, Nichelson N. 1996. Expressions of corporate social responsibility in U.K. firms. Journal of Business Ethics 15: 1095-1106.
101. Sahay A. 2004. Environmental reporting by Indian corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11(1): 12-22.
102. Schadewitz H, Niskala M. 2010. Communication via responsibility reporting and its effect on firm value in Finland. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17(2): 96-106.
103. Schaltegger S, Burritt R. 2006. Corporate Sustainability Accounting: a Nightmare or a Dream Coming True?. Business Strategy and the Environment 15: 293-295.
104. Schaltegger S, Burritt RB. 2010. Sustainability accounting for companies: catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? Journal of World Business 45(4): 375-384.
105. Scholtens B, Dam L. 2007. Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 75(3): 273-284.
106. Secchi D. 2006. The Italian experience in social reporting: an empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13: 135-149.
107. Sinclair P, Walton J. 2003. Environmental reporting within the forest and paper industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 12(5): 326-337.
108. Smith JVDL, Adhikari A, Tondkar RH. 2005. Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: a stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24(2): 123-151.
109. Sobhani FA, Amran A, Zainuddin Y. 2009. Revisiting the Practices of Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure in Bangladesh. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 167-183.
110. Spence C. 2009. Social and environmental reporting and the corporate ego. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(4): 254-265.
111. Stanny E, Ely K. 2008. Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15: 338-348.
112. Steurer R, Konrad A. 2009. Business-society relations in Central-Eastern and Western Europe: How those who lead in sustainability reporting bridge the gap in corporate (social) responsibility. Scandinavian Journal of Management 25: 23-36.
113. Stiller Y, Daub CH. 2007. Paving the way for sustainability communication: evidence from a Swiss study. Business Strategy and the Environment 16(7): 474-486.
114. Stray S, Ballantine J. 2000. A sectoral comparison of corporate environmental reporting and disclosure. Eco-Management and Auditing 7(4): 165-177.
115. Tagesson T, Blank V, Broberg P, Collin SO. 2009. What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: a study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 352-364.
116. Talouselämä. 2010. Talouselämä 500. http://www.talouselama.fi/te500/?view=ranklist&begin=1&end=100 [14 November 2010].
117. Transparency International. 2010. Corruption Perceptions Index 2010. Transparency International: Berlin.
118. Tsang S, Welford R, Brown M. 2009. Reporting on community investment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 123-136.
119. Vormedal I, Ruud A. 2009. Sustainability reporting in Norway - an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio-political drivers. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(4): 207-222.
120. Vuontisjärvi T. 2006. Corporate social reporting in the European context and human resource disclosure: an analysis of Finnish companies. Journal of Business Ethics 69: 331-354.
121. Wagner M. 2009. Innovation and competitive advantages from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(5): 291-306.
122. Welford R. 1995. Environmental Strategy and Sustainable Development. The Corporate Challenge for the 21st Century. Routledge: London.
123. Welford R. 2004. Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 17: 33-52.
124. Welford R, Gouldson A. 1993. Environmental Management and Business Strategy. Pitman: London.
125. Willis A. 2003. The role of the Global Reporting Initiative's sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics 43(3): 233-237.
126. Wilson C, Williams ID, Kemp S. 2011. Compliance with Producer Responsibility Legislation: Experiences from UK Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment 20(5): 310-330.
127. Yongvanich K, Guthrie J. 2006. An extended performance reporting framework for social and environmental accounting. Business Strategy and the Environment 15: 309-321.