Trends in sustainability reporting by the fortune global 250

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 279-291

  Kolk, Ans ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; GLOBALIZATION; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 0142122976     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.370     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ball A, Owen DL, Gray R. 2000. External transparency or internal capture? The role of third-party statements in adding value to corporate environmental reports. Business Strategy and the Environment 9: 1-23.
2. BASF. 2001. Social Responsibility 2000. We Take our Responsibility Seriously. Ludwigshafen.
3. BMW. 2002. Sustainable Value Report 2001/2002. Environment, Economy, Social Responsibility: Meeting the Future. München.
4. Dierkes M, Antal AB. 1986. Whither corporate social reporting: is it time to legislate? California Management Review 28(3): 106-121.
5. Gray R. 1997. The practice of silent accounting. In Building Corporate Accountability. Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting, Zadek S, Pruzan J, Evans R (eds). Earthscan: London; 201-217.
6. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 2000. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on Economic, Environmental and Social Performance. GRI: Boston.
7. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 2002. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. GRI: Boston.
8. Hertz N. 2001. The Silent Takeover. Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy. Heinemann: London.
9. Katzenstein P. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY.
10. Klein N. 2000. No Logo. Flamingo: London.
11. Kolk A, Walhain S, Van de Wateringen S. 2001. Environmental reporting by the Fortune Global 250: exploring the influence of nationality and sector. Business Strategy and the Environment 10: 15-28.
12. KPMG/UvA. 2002. KPMG International Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 2002. De Meern.
13. KPMG/WIMM. 1999. KPMG International Survey of Environmental Reporting 1999. The Hague.
14. Krut R, Moretz A. 2000. The state of global environmental reporting: lessons from the Global 100. Corporate Environmental Strategy 7(1): 85-91.
15. Line M, Hawley H, Krut R. 2002. The development of global environmental and social reporting. Corporate Environmental Strategy 9(1): 69-78.
16. Owen DL, Swift TA, Humphrey C, Bowerman M. 2000. The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? The European Accounting Review, 9(1): 81-98.
17. Power M. 1991. Auditing and environmental expertise: between protest and professionalisation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 4(3): 30-42.
18. Shell. 2001. People, Planet and Profits. The Shell Report. The Hague.
19. Unilever. 2001. Unilever's Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility. Social Review 2000. London.