Factors influencing the publication of social performance information: An Australian case study

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 129-143

  McMurtrie, Tony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Corporate philosophy; Corporate social disclosure; Internet; Stakeholder management

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144440879     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.79     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. AAA. 1974. Report on the Committee on the Measurement of Social Costs. Accounting Review 49(Supplement): 99-113.
2. AAA. 1975. Report on the Committee on the Measurement of Social Costs. Accounting Review 50(Supplement): 51-89.
3. Adams CA. 2002. Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(2): 223-250.
4. Adams CA, Hill W-Y, Roberts CB. 1998. Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: legitimating corporate behaviour. British Accounting Review 30: 1-21.
5. Adams CA, Kuasirikun N. 2000. A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies. The European Accounting Review 9(1): 53-79.
6. Andrew BH, Gul FA, Guthrie JE, Teoh HY. 1989. A note on corporate social disclosure practices in developing countries: the case of Malaysia and Singapore. British Accounting Review 21: 371-376.
7. Ashbaugh H, Johnstone KM, Warfield TD. 1999. Corporate reporting on the internet. Accounting Horizons 13(3): 241-257.
8. Belkaoui A, Karpik PG. 1989. Determinants in the corporate decision to disclose social information. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2(1): 36-51.
9. Cowen SS, Ferreri LB, Parker LD. 1987. The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organisations and Society 12(2): 111-122.
10. Craven BM, Marston CL. 1999. Financial reporting on the internet by leading UK companies. The European Accounting Review 8(2): 321-333.
11. Deegan C. 2000. Financial Accounting Theory. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
12. Deegan C, Gordon B. 1996. A study of environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26(3): 187-199.
13. Deegan C, Rankin M, Voght P. 2000. Firm's disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum 24(1): 101-130.
14. Dierkes M, Preston LE. 1977. Corporate social accounting and reporting for the physical environment: a critical review and implementation proposal. Accounting, Organisations and Society 2(1): 3-22.
15. Eisenhardt KM. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532-550.
16. Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S. 1995a. Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2): 47-77.
17. Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S. 1995b. Methodological themes constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2): 78-101.
18. Gray RH, Owen D, Adams CA. 1996. Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. Prentice-Hall: London.
19. Guthrie J, Parker LD. 1989. Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research 19(76): 343-352.
20. Guthrie J, Parker LD. 1990. Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3: 159-175.
21. Hackston D, Milne MJ. 1996. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 9(1): 77-108.
22. Holsti O. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
23. Jones K, Alabaster T, Hetherington K. 1999. Internet-based environmental reporting. Greener Management International Summer(26): 69.
24. Kelly GJ. 1981. Australian social responsibility disclosure: some insights into contemporary measurement. Accounting and Finance November: 97-107.
25. Leek S, Turnbull PW, Naude P. 2003. How is information technology affecting business relationships? Results from a UK survey. Industrial Marketing Management 32: 119-126.
26. Mathews MR. 1997. Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: is there a silver jubilee to celebrate? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 10(4): 481-531.
27. McQueen R. 2001. The corporate image - the regulation of annual reports in Australia. Macquarie Law Journal 1(1): 74-102.
28. Niskala M, Pretes M. 1995. Environmental reporting in Finland: a note on the use of annual reports. Accounting, Organisations and Society 20(6): 457-466.
29. O'Donovan G. 1996. The Inclusion of Environmental Information in the Annual Report: Who Decides? Environmental Accounting Symposium, Australian National University, Canberra.
30. Ogden S, Watson R. 1999. Corporate performance and stakeholder management: balancing shareholder and customer interest in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 526-538.
31. Parker LD. 1986. Polemical themes in social accounting: a scenario for standard setting. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 1: 67-93.
32. Patten DM. 1991. Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10: 297-308.
33. Patten DM. 1992. Intra-industry disclosure in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organisations and Society 17(5): 471-475.
34. Preston LE. 1981. Research on corporate social reporting: directions for future development. Accounting, Organisations and Society 6(3): 255-262.
35. Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. 2000. Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson: Harlow.
36. Scapens RW. 1990. Researching management accounting practice: the role of case study method. British Accounting Review 22: 259-281.
37. Tilt CA. 1994. The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 7(4): 47-72.
38. Tinker T, Neimark M. 1987. The role of annual reports in gender and class contradictions at General Motors: 1917-1976. Accounting, Organisations and Society 12(1): 71-88.
39. Toms JS. 2002. Firm resources, quality signal and determinants of corporate environmental reputation: UK evidence. British Accounting Review 34(3): 257-282.
40. Trotman KT, Bradley GW. 1981. Association between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting, Organisations and Society 6(4): 355-362.
41. Unerman J. 2000. Methodological issues: reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 13(5): 667-680.
42. Williams SM, Ho C-APW. 1999. Corporate social disclosures by listed companies on their web sites: an international comparison. The International Journal of Accounting 34(3): 389-419.
43. Wiseman J. 1982. An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organisations and Society 7(1): 53-63.
44. Woodward D, Edwards P, Birkin F. 2001. Some evidence of executives' views of corporate social responsibility. British Accounting Review 33(3): 357-397.
45. Woodward DG, Edwards P, Birkin F. 1996. Organizational legitimacy and stakeholder information provision. British Journal of Management 7: 329-347.
46. Yin RK. 1989. Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Sage: London.
47. Zeghal D, Ahmed SA. 1990. Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 3(1): 38-53.