Web content mining for comparing corporate and third-party online reporting: A case study on solid waste management

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 137-148

  Pollach, Irene ^a   Scharl, Arno ^b   Weichselbraun, Albert ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

^b GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Environmental reporting; Ontology; Quantitative linguistics; Waste management; Websites

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; MASS MEDIA; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOLID WASTE; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 70249084214     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.549     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abdelmoty AI et al. 2005. A critical evaluation of ontology languages for geographic information retrieval on the Internet. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 16(4): 331-358.
2. Alciatore M, Callaway C, Dee PE. 2004. Changes in environmental regulation and reporting: the case of the petroleum industry from 1989 to 1998. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23: 295-304.
3. Annandale D, Morrison-Saunders A, Bouma G. 2004. The impact of voluntary environmental protection instruments on company environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 13(1): 1-12.
4. Azzone G, Brophy M, Noci G, Welford R, Young W. 1997. A stakeholders' view of environmental reporting. Long Range Planning 30(5): 699-709.
5. Belal AR. 2000. Environmental reporting in developing countries: empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Eco-Management and Auditing 7(3): 114-121.
6. Bell D. 1973. The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society: a Venture in Social Forecasting. Basic: New York.
7. BioCycle. 2004. Composting and sustainable waste management help solve climate change problems. BioCycle 45(12): 11.
8. Campbell D. 2003. Intra- and intersectoral effects in environmental disclosures: evidence for legitimacy theory? Business Strategy and the Environment 12(6): 357-371.
9. Cerin P. 2002. Communication in corporate environmental reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9: 46-66.
10. Cimiano P, Pivk A, Schmidt-Thieme L, Staab S. 2005. Learning taxonomic relations from heterogeneous evidence. In Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Applications and Evaluation, Buitelaar P et al. (eds). IOS Press. Amsterdam; 59-73.
11. Connelly J, Limpaphayom P. 2004. Environmental reporting and firm performance: evidence from Thailand. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 13: 137-149.
12. Cormier D, Gordon IM, Magnan M. 2004. Corporate environmental disclosure: contrasting management's perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics 49(2): 143-165.
13. Cormier D, Magnan M. 2003. Environmental reporting management: a continental European perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22: 43-62.
14. Cormier D, Magnan M. 2004. The impact of the Web on information and communication models: the case of corporate environmental disclosure. International Journal of Technology Management 27(4): 393-416.
15. Corporate storytelling. 2004. The Economist 11 June: 13-14.
16. Dando N, Swift T. 2003. Transparency and assurance: minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2/3): 195-200.
17. Deegan C, Gordon B. 1996. A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26(3): 187-199.
18. Deegan C, Rankin M. 1996. Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 9(2): 50-67.
19. Di Vita G. 2004. Renewable resources and waste recycling. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 9: 159-167.
20. Edgington T et al. 2004. Adopting ontology to facilitate knowledge sharing. Communications of the ACM 47(11): 85-90.
21. Elkington J. 1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review 36(2): 90-100.
22. Esrock SL, Leichty GB. 1998. Social responsibility and corporate Web pages: self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review 24(3): 305-319.
23. Esrock SL, Leichty GB. 2000. Organization of corporate Web pages: publics and functions. Public Relations Review 26(3): 327-344.
24. Fellbaum, C. 1998. WordNet - an Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press: Boston, MA.
25. Gahleitner E, Behrendt W, Palkoska J, Weippl E. 2005. Knowledge sharing and reuse: on cooperatively creating dynamic ontologies. 16th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Hypertext-2005). ACM Press: Salzburg.
26. Giora R. 1996. Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: stumbling blocks in search of a unifi ed theory. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 17-34.
27. Gray RH, Javad M, Power DM, Sinclair CD. 2001. Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 28: 327-357.
28. Gruber TR. 1993. A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition 5: 199-220.
29. Gruber TR. 1995. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? International Journal of Human - Computer Studies 43(5/6): 907-928.
30. Guarino N. 1997. Understanding, building and using ontologies. International Journal of Human - Computer Studies 46(2/3): 293-310.
31. Haddad WD, Draxler A. 2002. The dynamics of technologies for education. In Technologies for Education - Potential, Parameters and Prospects. Haddad WD, Draxler A (eds). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris; 1-17.
32. Hooghiemstra R. 2000. Corporate communication and impression management - new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27(1/2): 55-68.
33. Isenmann R, Lenz C. 2001. Customized corporate environmental reporting by internet-based push and pull technologies. Eco-Management and Auditing 8(2): 100-110.
34. Isenmann R, Marx-Gómez J. 2004. How to provide customized environmental reports properly. In Environmental Online Communication, Scharl A (ed.). Springer: London; 173-182.
35. Jarrar M, Meersman R. 2002. Formal ontology engineering in the DOGMA approach. International Conference on Ontologies, Databases and Applications of Semantics (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 2519). Springer: Berlin; 1238-1254.
36. Joho H, Sanderson M, Beaulieu M. 2004. A study of user interaction with a concept-based interactive query expansion support tool. In Advances in Information Retrieval, 26th European Conference on Information Retrieval, McDonald S (ed.). Springer: Berlin; 42-56.
37. Kolk A. 2005. Environmental reporting by multinationals from the triad: convergence or divergence? Management International Review 45: 145-166.
38. Kolk A, Walhain S, van de Wateringen S. 2001. Environmental reporting by the Fortune Global 250: exploring the influence of nationality and sector. Business Strategy and the Environment 10(1): 15-28.
39. Krippendorff K. 1980. Content Analysis. An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.
40. Kunst M, Witlox N. 1993. Communication and the environment. Communication Research Trends 13(1): 1-31.
41. Lev B. 1992. Information disclosure strategy. California Management Review 34(4): 9-32.
42. Liu W, Weichselbraun A, Scharl A, Chang E. 2005. Semi-automatic ontology extension using spreading activation. Journal of Universal Knowledge Management 0(1): 50-58.
43. Marshall RS, Brown D. 2003. Corporate environmental reporting: what's in a metric? Business Strategy and the Environment 12(2): 87-106.
44. McManis BL, Ryker R, Cox C. 2001. An examination of Web usage in a global context. Industrial Management and Data Systems 101(8/9): 470-478.
45. Navigli R, Velardi P. 2005. Structural semantic interconnections: a knowledge-based approach to word sense disambiguation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27(7): 1075-1086.
46. Nirenburg S, Raskin V. 2004. Ontological Semantics. MIT Press: Boston, MA.
47. Niskala M, Pretes M. 1995. Environmental reporting in Finland: a note on the use of annual reports. Accounting, Organization and Society 20(6): 457-466.
48. Niskanen J, Neiminen T. 2001. The objectivity of corporate environmental reporting, a study of Finnish listed firms' environmental disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment 10: 29-37.
49. Noci G. 2000. Environmental reporting in Italy: current practice and future developments. Business Strategy and the Environment 9(4): 211-223.
50. OECD. 2004. Towards Waste Prevention Performance Indicators. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/1/1954291.pdf [20 February 2006].
51. Palmer JW, Griffith DA. 1998. An emerging model of Web site design for marketing. Communications of the ACM 41(3): 44-51.
52. Perry M, Bodkin C. 2000. Content analysis of Fortune 100 company Web sites. Corporate Communications: an International Journal 5(2): 87-96.
53. Pick T, Menger M, Jensen S, Lethen J. 2000. Access to environmental information - towards a digital global knowledge marketplace. In 14th Symposium on Computer Science for Environmental Protection. Metropolis: Bonn. http://enviroinfo.isep.at/UI%20200/ ui2000-etc-cds-paper2.el.hsp.pdf [30 June 2005].
54. Preuss L. 2005. Rhetoric and reality of corporate greening: a view from the supply chain management function. Business Strategy and the Environment 14(2): 123-139.
55. Reicher AK, Webb MS, Thomas EG. 2000. Corporate support for ethical and environmental policies: a financial management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 25(1): 53-64.
56. Rockness JW. 1985. An assessment of the relationship between US corporate environmental performance and disclosure. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 12(3): 339-354.
57. Roussinov D, Zhao JL. 2003. Automatic discovery of similarity relationships through Web mining. Decision Support Systems, 35: 149-166.
58. Runkel M. 2003. Product durability and extended producer responsibility in solid waste management. Environmental and Resource Economics 24: 161-182.
59. Sanderson M, Croft WB. 1999. Deriving concept hierarchies from text. 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, CA, 206-213.
60. Scharl A. 2000. Evolutionary Web Development. Springer: London.
61. Scharl A. 2004. Web coverage of renewable energy. In Environmental Online Communication, Scharl A(ed.). Springer: London; 25-34.
62. Scharl A, Pollach I, Bauer C. 2003. Determining the semantic orientation of Web-based corpora. In Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2690, Liu J, Cheung Y, Yin H (eds). Springer: Berlin; 840-849.
63. Schlegelmilch BB, Pollach I. 2005. The perils and opportunities of communicating corporate ethics. Journal of Marketing Management 21: 267-290.
64. Stanwick SD, Stanwick PA. 2000. The relationship between environmental disclosures and financial performance: an empirical study of US firms. Eco-Management and Auditing 7(4): 155-164.
65. Stone PJ. 1997. Thematic text analysis: new agendas for analyzing text content. In Text Analysis for the Social Sciences, Roberts C (ed.). Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ; 35-54.
66. Stray S, Ballantine J. 2000. A sectoral comparison of corporate environmental reporting and disclosure. Eco-Management and Auditing 7(4): 165-177.
67. Studer R, Benjamins VR, Fensel D. 1998. Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data and Knowledge Engineering 25: 161-197.
68. Tilt CA. 1997. Environmental policies of major companies: Australian evidence. British Accounting Review 29: 367-394.
69. UNEP. 1972. Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. http://www.unep.org/Documents/Default.asp?DocumentID=97 [20 February 2006].
70. Watson M, MacKay J. 2003. Auditing for the environment. Managerial Auditing Journal 18(8): 625-630.
71. Weaver GR, Treviño LK, Cochran PL. 1999. Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990s: an empirical study of the Fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics 18(3): 283-294.
72. Weber RP. 1985. Basic Content Analysis. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
73. Weingart P. 2002. The moment of truth for science. EMBO Reports 3(8): 703-706.
74. Wiseman J. 1982. An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 7(1): 53-63.