What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: A study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 352-364

  Tagesson, Torbjörn ^a   Blank, Veronica ^b   Broberg, Pernilla ^c   Collin, Sven Olof ^a  

^a HALMSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Ernst and Young   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

CSER; Social disclosures; Websites

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450160687     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: 15353966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.194     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Adams C, Hill W-Y, Roberts C. 1998. Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behavior? British Accounting Review 30(1): 1-21.
2. Adams C. 2002. Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorizing. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(2): 223-250.
3. Adrem AH. 1999. Essays on disclosure practices in Sweden - Causes and effects. Lund University Press: Lund.
4. Ashbaugh H, Johnstone KM, Warfield TD. 1999. Corporate reporting on the Internet. Accounting Horizons 13(3): 241-257.
5. Belkaoui A, Karpik P. 1989. Determinants of the corporate decision to disclose social information. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2(1): 36-51.
6. Branco M, Rodrigues L. 2006. Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: A legitimacy theory perspective. Corporate communications: An International Journal 11(3): 232-248.
7. Burritt R, Welch S. 1997. Australian commonwealth entities: An analysis of their environmental disclosures. Abacus 33(1): 1-19.
8. Capriotti P, Moreno A. 2007. Corporate citizenship and public relations: The importance and interactivity of social responsibility issues on corporate websites. Public Relations Review 33(1): 84-91.
9. Chan CJ, Welford R. 2005. Assessing corporate environmental risk in China: an evaluation of reporting activities of Hong Kong listed enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12(2): 88-104.
10. Clarke J, Gibson-Sweet M. 1999. The use of corporate social disclosures in the management of reputation and legitimacy: A cross sectoral analysis of UK top 100 companies. Business Ethics - A European Review 8(1): 5-13.
11. Collin S-O, Tagesson T, Andersson A, Cato J, Hansson, K. (Forthcoming). Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.003
12. Cooke TE. 1989. Voluntary corporate disclosure by Swedish companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 1(2): 171-195.
13. Cormier D, Magnan M, Van Velthoven B. 2005. Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review 14(1): 3-39.
14. Coupland C. 2005. Corporate social and environmental responsibility in web-based reports: Currency in the banking sector? Critical Perspectives on Accounting 17(7): 865-881.
15. Cowen S, Ferreri L, Parker L. 1987. The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(2): 111-122.
16. Craven BM, Marston CL. 1999. Financial reporting on the Internet by leading UK companies. The European Accounting Review 8(2): 321-333.
17. Debreceny R, Gray GL, Rahman A. 2002. The determinants of Internet financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21(4-5): 371-394.
18. Deegan C. 2002. The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures - A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(3): 282-311.
19. Douglas A, Doris J, Johnsson B. 2004. Corporate social reporting in Irish financial institutions. The TQM Magazine 16(6): 387-395.
20. Esrock S, Leichty G. 1998. Social responsibility and corporate web-pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review 24(3): 305-319.
21. Falkman P, Tagesson T. 2008. Accrual accounting does not necessarily mean accrual accounting: Factors that counteract compliance with accounting standards in Swedish municipal accounting. Scandinavian Journal of Management 24(3): 271-283.
22. Frost G, Seamer M. 2004. Adoption of environmental reporting and management practices: An analysis of the south Wales public sector entities. Financial Accountability & Management 18(2): 103-127.
23. Golob U, Bartlett J. 2007. Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review 33(1): 1-9.
24. Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S. 1995a. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8(2): 47-77.
25. Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S. 1995b. Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8(2): 78-101.
26. Gray SJ, Meek GK, Roberts CB. 1995c. International capital market pressures and voluntary annual report disclosures by US and UK multinationals. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 6(1): 43-68.
27. Guimarães-Costa N, Pina e Cunha M. 2008. The Atrium Effect of website openness on the communication of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15(1): 4-51.
28. Hackston D, Milne M. 1996. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9(1): 77-108.
29. Haniffa RM, Cooke TE. 2005. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24(5): 391-430.
30. Hooghiemstra R. 2000. Corporate communication and impression management - New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27(1-2): 55-68.
31. Hossain M, Reaz M. 2007. The determinants and characteristics of voluntary disclosures by Indian banking companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14(5): 274-288.
32. Hussein ME. 1996. A comparative study of cultural influences on financial reporting in the US and the Netherlands. The International Journal of Accounting, 31(1): 95-120.
33. Inchausti BG. 1997. The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms. The European Accounting Review 6(1): 45-68.
34. Ismail KNIK, Chandler R. 2005. Disclosure in the quarterly reports of Malaysian companies. Financial Reporting, Regulation & Governance 4(1): 1-25.
35. Jaggi B, Low PY. 2000. Impact of culture, market forces, and legal system on financial disclosures. The International Journal of Accounting 35(4): 495-519.
36. Jenkins H, Yakovleva N. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production 14(3-4): 271-284.
37. Knox S, Maklan S, French P. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Exploring stakeholder relationships and programme reporting across leading FTSE companies. Journal of Business Ethics 61(1): 7-28.
38. KPMG. 2005. International survey of corporate social responsibility reporting 2005. KPMG International: Amstelveen. ISBN 90-5522-031-0.
39. Lang MH, Lundholm RJ. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behaviour. The Accounting Review 17(4): 467-492.
40. Line M, Hawley H, Krut R. 2002. The development of global environmental and social reporting. Corporate Environmental Strategy 9(1): 69-78.
41. Ljungdahl F. 1999. Utveckling av miljöredovisning I svenska börsbolag - praxis, begrepp, orsaker. Lund University Press: Lund.
42. Maignan I, Ralston D. 2002. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from businesses' self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies 33(3): 497-514.
43. McMurtrie T. 2005. Factors influencing the publication of social performance information: An Australian case study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12(3): 129-143.
44. Meek GK, Roberts CB, Gray SJ. 1995. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26(3): 555-572.
45. Milne M. 2002. Positive accounting theory, political costs and social disclosure analyses: A critical look. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 13(3): 369-395.
46. Naturvårdsverket. 2007. Är statligt ägda företag föredömen I miljöarbetet? En utvärdering av hur statligt ägda företag arbetar mot miljökvalitetsmålen. Rapport Nr 5699.
47. Ness K, Mirha AM. 1991. Corporate social disclosure: A note on a test of agency theory. British Accounting Review 23(3): 211-217.
48. Neu D, Simmons C. 1996. Reconsidering the 'social' in positive accounting theory: The case of site restoration costs. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 7(4): 409-435.
49. Neu D, Warsame H, Pedwell K. 1998. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(3): 265-282.
50. Ng EJ, Koh HC. 1994. An agency theory and profit analytic approach to corporate non-mandatory disclosure compliance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting 1: 29-44.
51. O'Dwyer B. 2003. The ponderous evolution of corporate environmental reporting in Ireland. Recent evidence from publicly listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10(2): 91-100.
52. Oliver C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review 16(1): 145-179.
53. Oyelere P, Lasward F, Fisher R. 2003. Determinants of Internet financial teporting by New Zealand companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 14(1): 26-63.
54. Patten D. 1991. Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10(4): 297-308.
55. Pirsch J, Gupta S, Landreth-Grau S. 2007. A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics 70(2): 125-140.
56. Prencipe A. 2004. Proprietary costs and determinants of voluntary segment disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. European Accounting Review 13(2): 319-340.
57. Ratanajongkol S, Davey H, Low M. 2006. Corporate social reporting in Thailand: The news is all good and increasing. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 3(1): 67-83.
58. Roberts RW. 1992. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(6): 595-612.
59. Schipper K. 1991. Commentary on analysts' forecast. Accounting Horizons 5(4): 105-121.
60. Scott TW. 1994. Incentives and disincentives for financial disclosure: Voluntary disclosure of defined benefit pension plan information by Canadian firms. The Accounting Review 69(1): 26-43.
61. Scott WR. 2003. Financial Accounting Theory (3rd edn). Prentice Hall: Toronto.
62. Secci D. 2005. The Italian experience in social reporting: An empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13(3): 135-149.
63. Solomon J, Darby L. 2005. Is private social, ethical and environmental reporting Mythicizing or demythologizing reality? Accounting Forum 29(1): 27-47.
64. Stanny E, Ely K. 2008. Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15(6): 338-348.
65. Stanwick P, Stanwick S. 2006. Corporate environmental disclosures: A longitudinal study of Japanese firms. Journal of American Academy of Business 9(1): 1-7.
66. Trotman K, Bradley G. 1981. Associations between social responsibility, disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society 6(4): 355-362.
67. Ullman A. 1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure and economic performance of US firms. The Academy of Management Review 10(3): 540-557.
68. van der Laan Smith J, Adhikari A, Tondkar R. 2005. Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24(2): 123-151.
69. Verrecchia RE. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5(3): 179-194.
70. Watson A, Shrives P, Marston C. 2002. Voluntary disclosure of accounting ratios in the UK. British Accounting Review 34(2): 289-313.
71. Watts RL, Zimmerman JL. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.
72. Xiao JZ, Yang H, Chow CW. 2004. The determinants and characteristics of voluntary Internet-based disclosures by listed Chinese companies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23(3): 191-225.
73. Yamagami T, Koukouk K. 1991. A note on corporate social disclosure in Japan. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 4(4): 32-39.
74. Zarzeski MT. 1996. Spontaneous harmonization effects of culture and market forces on accounting disclosure practices. Accounting Horizons 10(1): 18-37.
75. Zeghal D, Ahmed S. 1990. Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 3(3): 38-53.