Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: A review of literature

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 269-275

  Quack, Valentin Michael ^a   Kathrein, Susanne ^a   Rath, Bijörn ^a   Tingart, Markus ^a   Lüring, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Leg alignment; Navigation; Osteoarthritis; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ASEPTIC LOOSENING; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER-ASSISTED NAVIGATION; GERMANY; OPERATION TIME; OSTEOARTHRITIS; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ALIGNMENT; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); KNEE PROSTHESES; NAVIGATION;

ARTHROPLASTY;

COMORBIDITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HUMAN; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; META ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREVALENCE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COMORBIDITY; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84867792965     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2011-0096     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Aqua Institute. Qualitätsreport 2009. http://www.sqg.de/sqg/upload/ CONTENT/Qualitaetsberichte/2009/AQUA-Qualitaetsreport-2009.pdf.
2. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Lüring C, Kalteis T, Grifka J. CT-basierte und CT-freie navigation in der Knieendoprothetik. Ergebnisse einer prospektiven studie. Unfallchirurg 2003; 106: 935-940.
3. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luering C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of computer-assisted implantation with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 682-687.
4. Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick L, Lüring C, Anders S, Grifka J. Total knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy in osteoar-thritis - results of a survey in traumatic surgery and orthopedic clinics. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005; 143: 19-24.
5. Bäthis H, Shafizadeh S, Paffrath T, Simanski C, Grifka J, Lüring C. Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Orthopäde 2006; 35: 1056-1065.
6. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 261-269.
7. Beldame J, Boisrenoult P, Beaufils P. Pin track induced fractures around computer-assisted TKA. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96: 249-255.
8. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 428: 26-34.
9. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellafemoral complications after total knee arthro-plasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356: 144-153.
10. Biasca N, Wirth S, Bungartz M. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimal invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA). Knee 2009; 16: 22-29.
11. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland RS, Kester M. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2004; 6A: 26-32.
12. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland PS, Kester M. Minimal invasive total knee arthroplasty: a 10-feature evolutionary approach. Orthop Clin North Am 2004; 35: 217-226.
13. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, et al. The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 45-61.
14. Briad JL, Witoolkollachit P, Lin G. Soft tissue management in total knee replacement. Analysis of ligament balancing. Orthopade 2007; 36: 635-642.
15. Brin YS, Nikolaou VS, Joseph L, Zukor DJ, Antoniou J. Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 331-339.
16. Browne JA, Cook C, Hofmann AA, Bolognesi MP. Postoperative morbidity and mortality following total knee arthroplasty with computer navigation. Knee 2010; 17: 152-156.
17. Cerha O, Kirschner S, Günther KP, Lützner J. Cost analysis for navigation in knee endoprothetics. Orthopäde 2009; 38: 1235-1240.
18. Chaiyakit P, Hongku N, Meknavin S. A comparison of early clinical outcome in computer assisted surgery and conventional technique in minimal invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai 2009; 92: 91-96.
19. Chang CW, Wu PT, Yang CY. Blood loss after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: effects of imageless navigation. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2010; 26: 237-243.
20. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 372-377.
21. Cheng T, Zhang G, Zhang X. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Res 2011; 171: 590-600.
22. Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X. Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011. (Epub ahead of print).
23. Dalury DF, Dennis DA. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 440: 77-81.
24. Deehan DJ, Murray JD, Birdsall PD, Pinder IM. Quality of life after knee revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2006; 77: 761-766.
25. Del Gaizo DJ, Della Valle CJ. Instability in primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2011; 34: 519-521.
26. Dong H, Buxton M. Early assessment of the likely cost-effec-tivness of a new technology: a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 22: 191-202.
27. Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Lo NN, Chia KU, Chong HC. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 2-9.
28. Engh GA. The difficult knee. Severe varus and valgus. Clin Orthop 2003; 416: 58-63.
29. Fehring TK, Valadie AL. Knee instability after total knee arthro-plasty. Orthop Relat Res 1994; 299: 157-162.
30. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997; 345: 79-86.
31. Fu Y, Wang M, Liu Y, Fu Q. Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007. Epub ahead of print.
32. Gonzalez MH, Mekhail AO. The failed total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and etiology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004; 12: 436-446.
33. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 163-173.
34. Hawker GA, Badley EM, Croxford R, et al. A population-based nested case-control study of the costs of hip and knee replacement surgery. Med Care 2009; 47: 732-741.
35. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, et al. Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 1107-1112.
36. Jenny J Y, Miehlke RK, Giurea A. Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 2008; 15: 80-84.
37. Jonsson B, Aström J. Alignment and long-term clinical results of semiconstrained knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 226: 124-128.
38. Kalairajah Y, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Ludbrook G, Spriggins AJ. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 198-202.
39. Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, et al. Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at mid-term follow-up? Int Orthop 2009; 33: 1567-1570.
40. Krackow KA, Bayers-Thering M, Phillips MJ, Mihalko WM. A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: progress toward computer-assisted TKA. Orthopedics 1999; 22: 698-702.
41. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 1487-1497.
42. Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyed AJ, et al. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 1296-1299.
43. Leelasestaporn C. Comparative mechanical axis deviation after TKA between conventional and CAS procedure. J Med Assoc Thai 2010; 93: 205-210.
44. Lehnen K, Giesinger K, Warschkow R, Porter M, Koch E, Kuster MS. Clinical outcome using a ligament referencing technique in CAS versus conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 887-892.
45. Loer I, Plitz W. Tibial malalignment of mobile-bearing prosthe-ses - a simulator study. Orthopade 2003; 32: 296-304.
46. Lüring C, Hüfner T, Kendoff D, et al. The effect of medial soft tissue release in total knee arthroplasty: a navigation controlled cadaver study. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 428-434.
47. Lüring C, Perlick L, Tingart M, Bäthis H, Grifka J. Advances in soft tissue management in total knee arthroplasty. The use of imageless navigation systems. Orthopade 2006; 35: 1066-1067.
48. Lüring C, Perlick L, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Grifka J. The effect of femoral component rotation on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2007; 30: 965-967.
49. Lüring C, Beckmann J, Haiböck P, Perlick L, Grifka J, Tingart M. Minimal invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: a prospective, randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16: 928-934.
50. Lüring C, Oczipka F, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J, Bäthis H. Two year follow-up comparing assisited versus freehand TKR on joint stability, muscular function and patients satisfaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17: 228-232.
51. Lüring C, Kauper M, Bäthis H, et al. A five to seven year follow-up comparing computer-assisted vs freehand TKR with regard to clinical parameters. Int Orthop 2011; Epub ahead of print.
52. Ma HM, Lu YC, Ho FY, Huang CH. Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 580-584.
53. Maculè-Beneyto F, Hernandès-Vaquero D, Segur-Vilalta M, et al. Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study. Int Orthop 2006; 30: 536-540.
54. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CJH, Allen PW. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 635-640.
55. Mahoney OM, McClung CD, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The effect of total knee arthroplasty designon extensor mechanism function. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 416-421.
56. Massai F, Conteduca F, Vadala A, Iorio R, Basiglini L, Ferretti A. Tibial stress fracture after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 2010; 11: 123-127.
57. Mihalko WM, Whiteside LA, Krackow KA. Comparison of ligament-balancing techniques during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85: 132-135.
58. Mihalko WM, Saleh KJ, Krackow KA, Whiteside LA. Soft tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty in the varus knee. J Am Akad Orthop Surg 2009; 17: 766-774.
59. Millar NL, Deakin AH, Millar LL, Kinnimonth AW, Picard F. Blood loss following total knee replacement in the morbidly obese: effects of computer navigation. Knee 2011; 18: 108-112.
60. Morawa LG, Manley MT, Edidin AA, Reilly DT. Transesophageal echocardiographic monitored events during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 331: 192-198.
61. Nizard R. Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2002; 68: 215-230.
62. Novak EJ, Silverstein MD, Bozik KJ. The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 2389-2397.
63. Ong SM, Taylor GJ. Can knee position save blood following total knee replacement? Knee 2003; 10: 81-85.
64. Pang HN, Yeo SJ, Chong HC, Chin PL, Ong J, Lo NN. Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Athrosc 2011; 19: 1496-1503.
65. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Lerch K, Lüring C, Tingart M, Grifka J. Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses in secondary knee osteoarthritis of rheumatoid arthritis patients as compared to conventional technique. Z Rheumatol 2004; 63: 1-7.
66. Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998; 3: 67-72.
67. Picard F, Moody JE, DiGiois III AM, Jaramaz B. Clinical classification of CAOS systems. In: DiGioia A, Jaramaz B, Picard F, Nolte LP, editors. Computer and robotic assisted hip and knee surgery. Oxford: University Press 2004: 43-48.
68. Rath B, Springorum HR, Beckmann J, et al. Importance of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty - results of a nationwide survey in Germany. Z Orthop Unfall 2011; 149: 173-177.
69. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988; 232: 168-173.
70. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Mahoney OM, Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 260: 43-51.
71. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 1994; 299: 153-156.
72. Robertson O, Dunbar MJ, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Past incidence and future demand for knee arthroplasty in Sweden: a report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register regarding the effect of past and future population changes on the number of arthroplasties performed. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 268-274.
73. Schmitt J, Hauk C, Kienapfel H, et al. Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 15: 16.
74. Schnurr C, Csècsei G, Eysel P, König DP. The effect of computer navigation on blood loss and transfusion rate in TKA. Orthopedics 2010; 33: 474.
75. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 404: 7-13.
76. Seon JK, Song EK, Yoon TR, Park SJ, Bae BH, Cho SG. Comparison of functional results with navigation-assisted minimally invasive and conventional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 2007; 12: 189-193.
77. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sioan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results after two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 477-480.
78. Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 426: 180-186.
79. Tingart M, Luring C, Bathis H, Beckmann J, Grifka J, Perlick L. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16: 44-50.
80. Thiengwittayaporn S, Junsee D, Tanavalee A. A comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery with and without electromagnetic computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai 2009; 92: S27-32.
81. Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 2005; 38: 349-355.
82. Windhagen H, Thorey F, Ostermeier S, Emmerich J, Wirth CJ, Stukenborg - Colsman C. Das Navigatonzept. Prozessoptimierung in der navigierten Knie - endoprothetik. [Navigator concept. Optimizing the procedure for navigated total knee arthroplasty]. Orthopäde 2005; 34: 1125-1130.