Cost analysis for navigation in knee endoprosthetics;Kostenanalyse zur navigation in der knieendoprothetik

Orthopade

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1235-1240

  Cerha, O ^a   Kirschner, S ^a   Gunther K P ^a   Lutzner J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Additional costs; Computer assisted navigation; Cost analysis; Diagnosis related groups; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE COSTS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 73649123553     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1473-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bathis H, Shafizadeh S, Paffrath T et al (2006) Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Orthopade 35(10):1056-1065
2. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M et al (2007) Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2):261-269
3. 3. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB et al (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (428):26-34 (Pubitemid 39506147)
4. BQS (2007) BQS-Qualitätsreport 2007. BQS, Düsseldorf, http://www.bqs-outcome.de/2007
5. 5. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(3):372-377 (Pubitemid 38559489)
6. 6. Church JS, Scadden JE, Gupta RR et al (2007) Embolic phenomena during computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br89(4):481-485 (Pubitemid 46851127)
7. Carl Gustav Carus Universitätsklinikum (2008) Controlling. Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden
8. 8. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J et al (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20(3):282-288 (Pubitemid 40460792)
9. 9. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A et al (2007) Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res457:156-162 (Pubitemid 46573409)
10. Friederich N, Verdonk R (2008) The use of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery for total knee replacement in daily practice: a survey among ESSKA/SGO-SSO members. Knee Surg Sports Trauma- tol Arthrose 16(6)536-543
11. 11. Hofmann S, Romero J, Roth-Schiffl E, Albrecht T (2003) Rotational malalignment of the components may cause chronic pain or early failure in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 32(6):469-476 (Pubitemid 36829885)
12. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5):709-714
13. Jenny JY, Miehlke RK, Giurea A (2008) Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 15(2):80-84
14. Jerosch J, Fuchs S, Heisel J (1997) Knieendoprothetik- eine Standortbestimmung. Dtsch Arztebl 94(8):A-449/B-361/C-339
15. 15. Kessler O, Lacatusu E, Sommers MB et al (2006) Malrotation in total knee arthroplasty: Effect on tibial cortex strain captured by laser-based strain acquisition. Clin Biomech 21(6):603-609 (Pubitemid 43816750)
16. 16. Kim SJ, MacDonald M, Hernandez J, Wixson RL (2005) Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl3):123-131 (Pubitemid 41425796)
17. Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH (2007) Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(4):471-1176
18. 18. Krackow KA, Bayers-Thering M, Phillips MJ, Mihalko WM (1999) A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: progress toward computer-assisted TKA. Orthopedics 22(7):698-702 (Pubitemid 29343117)
19. 19. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59(1 ):77-79 (Pubitemid 8030304)
20. Luo JW, Yu CT, Qin J, Xu DC (2006) Rotational malalignment causing patellofemoral complications after total knee replacement. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 26(2):217-219
21. Luring C, Bathis H, Tingart M et al (2006) Computer assistance in total knee replacement - a critical assessment of current health care technology. Comput Aided Surg 11 (2):77-80
22. Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C et al (2008) Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: A comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and ct evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(8):1039-1044
23. Macule-Beneyto F, Hernandez-Vaquero D, Segur-Vilalta JM et al (2006) Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study, lnt Orthop 30(6)536-540
24. 24. Martin A, Wohlgenannt O, Prenn M et al (2007) lmageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 460:178-184 (Pubitemid 47056495)
25. 25. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R et al (2007) Metaanalysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 22(8):1097-1106 (Pubitemid 350216994)
26. 26. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U et al (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Threedimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2):236-243 (Pubitemid 46214339)
27. Molfetta L, Caldo D (2008) Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 15(2):75-79
28. 28. Novak EJ, Silverstein MD, Bozic KJ (2007)The costeffectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(11):2389-2397 (Pubitemid 350086327)
29. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res (299):153-156
30. 30. Romero J, Stahelin T, Binkert C et al (2007) The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(2):235-240 (Pubitemid 46162089)
31. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C et al (2001) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparat Apparat Mot 87(1):18-28
32. Slover JD Tosteson AN, Bozic KJ et al (2008) Impact of hospital volume on the economic value of computer navigation for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(7):1492-1500
33. 33. Sparmann M, Wolke B (2003) Value of navigation and robot-guided surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 32(6):498-505 (Pubitemid 36829889)
34. 34. Spencer JM. Chauhan SK, Sloan K et al (2007) Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(4):477-480 (Pubitemid 46851126)
35. Stulberg SD, Yaffe MA, Koo SS (2006) Computerassisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am88(Suppl 4):47-54
36. Weinrauch R Myers N.Wilkinson M et al (2006) Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcomefollowing total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14(1 ):47-52
37. Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LR Rullkoetter PJ (2005) The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Bio- mech 38(2)349-355
38. Windhagen H, Thorey F, Ostermeier S et al (2005) Navigator concept. Optimizing the procedure for navigated total knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 34(11):1125-1130