Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: A 10-feature evolutionary approach

Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 217-226

  Bonutti, Peter M ^a   Mont, Michael A ^b   Kester, Mark A ^c  

^a Bonutti Clinic   (United States)

^b SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMUR CONDYLE; FEMUR OSTEOTOMY; HUMAN; JOINT DISLOCATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE RESECTION; MUSCLE TONE; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOPHYTE; PATELLA; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; PATIENT POSITIONING; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; QUADRICEPS FEMORIS MUSCLE; RETRACTOR; SHOULDER; SKIN INCISION; SOFT TISSUE; SURGEON; SURVIVAL TIME; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TOURNIQUET; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1842475602     PISSN: 00305898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2004.02.001     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Trousdale R.T., McGrory B.J., Berry D.J., Becker M.W., Harmsen W.S. Patients' concerns prior to undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Mayo Clin Proc. 74:1999;978-982.
2. Zimmer Corporation Minimally invasive: the M/G unicompartmental knee. 2001;Zimmer Inc.
3. Medical Professional Zimmer Global Webcast features live minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty as training tool for Orthopaedic surgeons. Available at: http://www.zimmer.com. Accessed June 9, 2003.
4. Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics Technical monograph on MIS TKA. 2004;Stryker Howmedica Osteonics.
5. Neer C.S. 2nd Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg. 54:1972;41-50.
6. Mont M.A., Stuchin S.A., Bonutti P.M., Tria A.J., Sharkey P.A., et al. Different surgical options for monocompartmental osteonecrosis of the knee. In press.
7. Repicci J.A. Mini-invasive knee unicompartmental arthroplasty: bone-sparing technique. Surg Technol Int. 11:2003;280-284.
8. Iorio R., Healy W.L. Unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 85:2003;1351-1364.
9. Argenson J.N., Chevrol-Benkeddache Y., Aubaniac J.M. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84:2002;2235-2239.
10. Sculco T.P. Orthopaedic crossfire - can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in opposition J Arthroplasty. 17(Suppl 1):2002;56-58.
11. Skyrme A.D., Mencia M.M., Skinner P.W. Early failure of the porous-coated anatomic cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 5- to 9-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 17:2002;201-205.
12. Levine W.N., Ozuna R.M., Scott R.D., Thornhill T.S. Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasties to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 11:1996;787-801.
13. Fischer D. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement Presentation at the Indiana Orthopaedic Association Meeting. Indianapolis, IN, May 10, 2003.
14. Romanowski M.R., Repicci J.A. Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg. 15:2002;17-22.
15. Price A., Webb J., Topf H., Dodd C.A., Goodfellow J.W., Murray D.W. Oxford Hip and Knee Group Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty. 16:2001;970-976.
16. Buechel F.F. Sr. Long-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 404:2002;40-50.
17. Font-Rodriguez D.E., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 345:1997;79-86.
18. Hanssen A.D., Rand J.A. A comparison of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the kinematic stabilizer prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 70:1988;491-499.
19. Keating E.M., Meding J.B., Faris P.M., Ritter M.A. Long-term follow-up of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop. 404:2002;34-39.
20. Rand J.A., Ilstrup D.M. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty: cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 73:1991;397-409.
21. Scott W.N., Rubinstein M., Scuderi G. Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 70:1988;1163-1173.
22. Stern S.H., Insall J.N. Posterior stabilized prosthesis: Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 74:1992;980-986.
23. Dickstein R., Heffes Y., Shabtai E.I., Markowitz E. Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: patients' self-appraisal 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Gerontology. 44:1998;204-210.
24. Bullens P.H., van Loon C.J., de Waal Malefijt M.C., Laan R.F., Veth R.P. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 16:2001;740-747.
25. Dalury D.F., Jiranek W.A. A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 14:1999;33-37.
26. Roysam G.S., Oakley M.J. Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial. J Arthroplasty. 16:2001;454-457.
27. Parentis M.A., Rumi M.N., Deol G.S., Kothari M., Parrish W.M., Pellegrini V.D. Jr. A comparison of the vastus splitting and median parapatellar approaches in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 367:1999;107-116.
28. Engh G.A., Parks N.L. Surgical technique of the midvastus arthrotomy. Clin Orthop. 351:1998;270-274.
29. Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. The midvastus approach to the knee. J Knee Surg. 16:2003;48-51.
30. White R.E. Jr., Allman J.K., Trauger J.A., Dales B.H. Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop. 367:1999;117-122.
31. Keating E.M., Faris P.M., Meding J.B., Ritter M.A. Comparison of the midvastus muscle splitting approach with the median parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 14:1999;29-32.
32. Mahoney O.M., McClung C.D., dela Rosa M.A., Schmalzried T.P. The effect of total knee arthroplasty design on extensor mechanism function. J Arthroplasty. 17:2002;416-421.
33. Bonutti P., Kester M. Use of suspended leg technique for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 26:2003;889-903.
34. Incavo S.J., Coughlin K.M., Pappas C., Beynnum D.D. Anatomic rotational relationship of the proximal tibia, distal femur, and patella: implication for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 18:2003;643-648.
35. Poilvache P.L., Insall J.N., Scuderi G.R., Font-Rodriguez D.E. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 331:1996;35-46.
36. Whiteside L.A., Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 321:1995;168-172.