Importance of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty - Results of a nationwide survey in Germany;Aktueller stellenwert der navigation in der knieendoprothetik in orthopädischen und unfallchirurgischen kliniken in Deutschland

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie

Volumn 149, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 173-177

  Rath, B ^a   Springorum, H R ^a   Beckmann, J ^a   Schaumburger, J ^a   Tingart, M ^a   Grifka, J ^a   Luring C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

computer assisted navigation; survey; total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE INJURY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; KNEE INJURIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953889259     PISSN: 1864-669     EISSN: 18646743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1250469     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bundesgeschäftsstelle für Qualitätssicherung. BQS Qualitätsreport Fachgruppe Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Im Internet: http://www.bqs-qualitaetsindikatoren.de/2008/17n5-KNIE-TEP
2. Bundesgeschäftsstelle für Qualitätssicherung. BQS Qualitätsreport Fachgruppe Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Im Internet: http://www.bqs-qualitaetsindikatoren.de/2008/17n7-KNIE-WECH
3. Bertsch C, Holz U, Konrad G et al. Early clinical outcome after navigated total knee arthroplasty. Comparison with conventional implantation in TKA: a controlled and prospective analysis. Orthopade 2007 36 739-745
4. Brin Y S., Nikolaou V S., Joseph L et al. Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop 2010 [Epub ahead of print]
5. Kamat Y D., Aurakzai K M., Adhikari A R. et al. Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up? Int Orthop 2009 33 1567-1570
6. Leng C G., Zhao J T., Chen C M. et al. Computer-assisted navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study with conventional methods. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2007 87 3035-3037
7. Tingart M, Luring C, Bathis H et al. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008 16 44-50
8. Weng Y J., Hsu R W., Hsu W H. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009 24 668-673
9. Callaghan J J., Liu S S., Warth L C. Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2006 21 27-28
10. Bonutti P M., Dethmers D, Ulrich S D. et al. Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008 466 2756-2762
11. Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick L et al. Total knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy in osteoarthritis - results of a survey in traumatic surgery and orthopedic clinics. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005 143 19-24
12. Lüring C, Tingart M, Beckmann J et al. [Surgical Training in Orthopaedic and Trauma Departments in Germany]. Z Orthop Unfall 2010 148 466-470
13. Jenny J Y., Miehlke R K., Giurea A. Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 2008 15 80-84
14. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004 86 682-687
15. Bathis H, Shafizadeh S, Paffrath T et al. Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Orthopade 2006 35 1056-1065
16. Lee D H., Park J H., Song D I. et al. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010 18 381-387
17. Luring C, Bathis H, Tingart M et al. Computer assistance in total knee replacement - a critical assessment of current health care technology. Comput Aided Surg 2006 11 77-80
18. Sharkey P F., Hozack W J., Rothman R H. et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002 404 7-13
19. Graichen H, Strauch M, Katzhammer T et al. Ligament instability in total knee arthroplasty - causal analysis. Orthopade 2007 36 650-656
20. Kalairajah Y, Cossey A J., Verrall G M. et al. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006 88 198-202
21. Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey A J. et al. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006 88 44-48
22. Cerha O, Kirschner S, Günther K P. et al. Cost analysis for navigation in knee endoprosthetics. Orthopade 2009 38 1235-1240
23. Friederich N, Verdonk R. The use of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery for total knee replacement in daily practice: a survey among ESSKA/SGO-SSO members. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008 16 536-543
24. Chotanaphuti T, Ongnamthip P, Teeraleekul K et al. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study. J Med Assoc Thai 2008 91 1382-1388
25. Walde T A., Bussert J, Sehmisch S et al. Optimized functional femoral rotation in navigated total knee arthroplasty considering ligament tension. Knee 2010 [Epub ahead of print]
26. Duffy G P., Murray B E., Trousdale R R. Hybrid total knee arthroplasty analysis of component failures at an average of 15 years. J Arthroplasty 2007 22 1112-1115
27. Gioe T J., Killeen K K., Grimm K et al. Why are total knee replacements revised?: analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 428 100-106
28. Buckup K, Linke L C., Hahne V. Minimally invasive implantation and computer navigation for a unicondylar knee system. Orthopedics 2007 30 66-69
29. Jenny J Y. Navigated unicompartmental knee replacement. Sports Med Arthrosc 2008 16 103-107
30. Jenny J Y. Unicompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of four techniques combining less invasive approach and navigation. Orthopedics 2008 31 (10 Suppl. 1)
31. Jung K A., Kim S J., Lee S C. et al. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A comparison with a conventional instrumented technique. Knee 2009 [Epub ahead of print]
32. Marcacci M, Nofrini L, Iacono F et al. A novel computer-assisted surgical technique for revision total knee arthroplasty. Comput Biol Med 2007 37 1771-1779
33. Perlick L, Bathis H, Perlick C et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005 13 167-173
34. Perlick L, Luring C, Tingart M et al. Revision prosthetic of the knee joint. The influence of a navigation system on the alignment and reconstruction of the joint line. Orthopade 2006 35 1080-1086