Erratum to Using evidence for teacher education program improvement and accountability: An illustrative case of the role of value-added measures (Journal of Teacher Education, (2012), 63, (318-334), 10.1177/0022487112447110);Using Evidence for Teacher Education Program Improvement and Accountability: An Illustrative Case of the Role of Value-Added Measures

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 318-334

  Plecki, Margaret L ^a   Elfers, Ana M ^a   Nakamura, Yugo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

educational policy; quantitative research; school teacher effectiveness; teacher research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867690594     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487112470806b     Document Type: Erratum

References (67)

1. Aaronson D.,Barrow L.,Sander W.Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools.Journal of Labor Economics. 2007;25 (1): 95-135.
2. Bell C. A.,Youngs P.Substance and show: Understanding responses to teacher education programme accreditation processes.Teaching and Teacher Education. 2011;27 (2): 298-307.
3. Boyd D. J.,Grossman P. L.,Lankford H.,Loeb S.,Wyckoff J.How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and effect student achievement. Albany, NY: Teacher Policy Research; 2005:.
4. Boyd D. J.,Grossman P. L.,Lankford H.,Loeb S.,Wyckoff J.Teacher preparation and student achievement.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2009;31 (4): 416-440.
5. Boyd D. J.,Lankford H.,Loeb S.,Rockoff J. E.,Wyckoff J.The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2008;27 (4): 793-818.
6. Braun H.Using student progress to evaluate teachers: A primer on value-added models. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service; 2005:.
7. Cibulka J. G.The new normal: Challenges and opportunities for the transformation of teacher preparation.Quality Teaching: A Publication of the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. 2011;21 (1): 1-5.
8. Clotfelter C. T.,Ladd H. F.,Vigdor J. L.How and why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement?. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2007:.
9. Cochran-Smith M.Learning to teach against the (new) grain.Journal of Teacher Education. 2001;52 (1): 3-4.
10. Cochran-Smith M.Reculturing teacher education: Inquiry, evidence, and action.Journal of Teacher Education. 2009;60 (5): 458-468.
11. Constantine J.,Player D.,Silva T.,Hallgren K.,Grider M.,Deke J.An evaluation of teachers trained through different routes to certification: Final report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2009:.
12. Croninger R.,Rice J.,Rathbun A.,Nishio M.Teacher qualifications and early learning: Effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement.Economics of Education Review. 2007;26 (3): 312-324.
13. Crowe E.Measuring what matters: A stronger accountability model for teacher education. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress; 2010:.
14. Danielson C.Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development; 1996:.
15. Darling-Hammond L.Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York, NY: The National Commission on Teaching and America's Future; 1997:.
16. Darling-Hammond L.Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes.Journal of Teacher Education. 2006a;57 (2): 120-138.
17. Darling-Hammond L.Constructing 21st century teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education. 2006b;61 (5): 300-314.
18. Donaldson M. L.,Johnson S. M.The price of misassignment: The role of teaching assignments in Teach for America teachers' exit from low-income schools and the teaching profession.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2010;32 (2): 299-323.
19. Duncan A.Teacher preparation: Reforming the uncertain profession.Education Digest. 2010;75 (5): 13-22.
20. Elfers A.,Plecki M.,Knapp M.Teacher mobility: Looking more closely at "the movers" within a state system.Peabody Journal of Education. 2006;81 (3): 94-127.
21. Glazerman S.,Isenberg E.,Dolfin S.,Bleeker M.,Johnson A.,Grider M.,Jacobus M.Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Final results from a randomized controlled study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2010:.
22. GoeL.BellC.LittleO. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.tqsource.org/publications/EvaluatingTeachEffectiveness.pdf.
23. GoeL.HoldheideL. (2011). Measuring teachers' contributions to student learning growth for nontested grades and subjects. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.tqsource.org/publications/MeasuringTeachersContributions.pdf.
24. Goldhaber D. D.,Brewer D. J.Why don't schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity.Journal of Human Resources. 1997;32 (3): 505-523.
25. Goldhaber D. D.,Liddle S.The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement. Bothell, WA: Center for Education Data and Research; 2011:.
26. Goodlad J.Why we need a complete redesign of teacher education.Educational Leadership. 1991;49 (3): 4-10.
27. Gottardo R.,Raftery A. E.Bayesian robust variable and transformation selection: A unified approach.Canadian Journal of Statistics. 2009;37 (3): 361-380.
28. Grossman P.,Loeb S.,Cohen J.,Hammerness K.,Wyckoff J.,Boyd D.,Lankford H.Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers' value-added scores. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2010:.
29. GuinK. (2004). Chronic teacher turnover in urban elementary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(24), 42. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n42/.
30. Hanushek E. A.,Kain J. F.,O'Brien D. M.,Rivkin S. G.The market for teacher quality. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2005:.
31. Hanushek E. A.,Kain J. F.,Rivkin S. G.Why public schools lose teachers.Journal of Human Resources. 2004;39 (2): 326-354.
32. Harris D. H.,Sass T.Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2009a:.
33. Harris D. H.,Sass T.What makes for a good teacher and who can tell?. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2009b:.
34. Harris D. N.Would accountability based on teacher value added be smart policy? An examination of the statistical properties and policy alternatives.Education Finance and Policy. 2009;4 (4): 319-350.
35. Harris D. N.Value-added measures in education: What every educator needs to know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2011:.
36. Harris D. N.,Rutledge S. A.Models and predictors of teacher effectiveness: A comparison of research about teaching and other occupations.Teachers College Record. 2010;112 (3): 914-960.
37. Henry G. T.,Thompson C. L.,Bastian K. C.,Fortner C. K.,Kershaw D. C.,Marcus J. V.,Zulli R. A.UNC teacher preparation program effectiveness report. Chapel Hill: Carolina Institute for Public Policy; 2011:.
38. Hill H. C.,Rowan B.,Ball D. L.Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement.American Educational Research Journal. 2005;42 (2): 371-406.
39. Ingersoll R. M.,Strong M.The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of research.Review of Educational Research. 2011;81 (2): 201-233.
40. Jacob B. A.,Lefgren L.Can principals identify effective teachers: Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education.Journal of Labor Economics. 2008;26 (1): 101-136.
41. JohnsonS. M.BirkelandS.KardosS.KauffmanD.LiuE.PeskeH. (2001). Retaining the next generation of teachers: The importance of school-based support (Harvard Education Letter Online). Retrieved from http://www.edletter.org/current/support/shtml.
42. Kane T. J.,Taylor E. S.,Tyler J. H.,Wooten A. L.Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2010:.
43. Kimball S. M.,White B.,Milanowski A. T.,Borman G.Examining the relationship between teacher evaluation and student assessment results in Washoe County.Peabody Journal of Education. 2004;79 (4): 54-78.
44. Labaree D.How to succeed in school without really learning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1995:.
45. Labaree D.The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2004:.
46. Lockwood J. R.,Doran H.,McCaffrey D. F.Using R for estimating longitudinal student achievement models.R News. 2003;3 (3): 17-23.
47. LudlowL. H.PedullaJ.ReaganE.EnterlineS.CannadyM.ChappeS. (2011). Design and implementation issues in longitudinal research. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 19(11). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/802.
48. Luekens M. T.,Lyter D. M.,Fox E. E.Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-up Survey, 2000-01. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics; 2004:.
49. Milanowski A.The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from Cincinnati.Peabody Journal of Education. 2004;79 (4): 33-53.
50. The condition of education 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2005:.
51. Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Washington, DC: Author; 2010:.
52. Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010:.
53. NoellG. H.PorterB. A.PattR. M.DahirA. (2008). Value-added assessment of teacher preparation in Louisiana: 2004-2005 to 2006-2007. Retrieved from http://www.laregentsarchive.com/Academic/TE/2008/Final%20Value-Added%20Report%20(12.02.08).pdf.
54. Pecheone R. L.,Chung R. R.Evidence in teacher education: The performance assessment for California teachers (PACT).Journal of Teacher Education. 2006;57 (1): 22-36.
55. Peck C. A.,Gallucci C.,Sloan T.Negotiating implementation of high-stakes performance assessment policies in teacher education: From compliance to inquiry.Journal of Teacher Education. 2010;61 (5): 451-463.
56. Pianta R. C.,Hamre B. K.,Haynes N.,Mintz S. J.,La Paro K. M.Classroom assessment scoring system (CLASS) manual: Middle/secondary version pilot. Charlottesville: University of Virginia; 2006:.
57. Raudenbush S. W.,Bryk A. S.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2002:.
58. Rockoff J. E.,Jacob B. A.,Kane T. J.,Staiger D. O.Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one?.Education Finance and Policy. 2011;6 (1): 43-74.
59. SawchuckS. (2011, September30). Momentum builds for teacher education overhaul. Education Week. Available from http://edweek.org.
60. SawchuckS. (2012, February7). "Value added" concept proves beneficial to teacher colleges. Education Week. Available from http://edweek.org.
61. Smith T. M.,Ingersoll R. M.What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?.American Educational Research Journal. 2004;41 (3): 681-714.
62. Soltis J. F.Reforming teacher education: Impact of the Holmes Group report. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 1987:.
63. Tennessee Higher Education Commission and the State Board of Education. (2011). 2011 Report card on the effectiveness of teacher training programs. Nashville, TN: Author.
64. Wilson S.,Floden R.,Ferrini-Mundy J.Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps and recommendations. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy; 2001:.
65. Wineburg M. S.Evidence in teacher preparation: Establishing a framework for accountability.Journal of Teacher Education. 2006;57 (1): 51-64.
66. Yoon K. S.,Duncan T.,Lee S. W.-Y.,Scarloss B.,Shapley K.Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest; 2007:.
67. Zeichner K. M.,Conklin H. G.Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Cochran-Smith M.Zeichner K., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:645-735.