A Corresponding Fields Model for the Links Between Social and Digital Exclusion

Communication Theory

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 403-426

  Helsper, Ellen Johanna ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; MODELING; SOCIAL EXCLUSION; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84867587013     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A., & Marques, J. M. (2005). A social psychological framework for understanding social inclusion and exclusion. In D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg & J. M. Marques (Eds.), The social psychology of exclusion and inclusion (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis Books).
2. Alvi, I., Bradbrook, G., Fisher, J., Lloyd, H., Moore, R., Thompson, V., et al. (2007). Meeting their potential: The role of education and technology in overcoming disadvantage and disaffection in young people. London, England: Becta.
3. Anderson, B. (2005). The value of mixed-method longitudinal panel studies in ICT research: Transitions in and out of "ICT poverty" as a case in point. Information, Communication & Society, 8(3), 343-367.
4. Anderson, B. (2007). Social capital, quality of life and ICTs. In B. Anderson, M. Brynin, J. Gershuny, & Y. Raban (Eds.), Information and communications technologies in society: E-living in a digital Europe (pp. 163-174). Oxford, England: Routledge.
5. Anderson, B., & Tracey, K. (2001). Digital living: The impact (or otherwise) of the Internet on everyday life. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 456-475.
6. Anthias, F. (2001). The concept of "social division" and theorising social stratification: Looking at ethnicity and class. Sociology, 35(4), 835-854.
7. Atkinson, A. (1998). Social exclusion, poverty and unemployment. In A. Atkinson & J. Hills (Eds.), Exclusion, employment and opportunity (pp. 1-20). London: STICERD, London School of Economics Discussion Papers Series CASE/4.
8. Atkinson, A. B., Cantillon, B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B. (2002). Social indicators: The EU and social inclusion. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
9. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206-1222.
10. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity in social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230-244.
11. Beckers, J. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2001). The structure of computer anxiety: A six-factor model. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 35-49.
12. Bimber, B. (2000). Measuring the gender gap on the internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 868-876.
13. Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using email for personal relationships. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 530-549.
14. Bossert, W., D'Ambrosio, C., & Peragine, V. (2007). Deprivation and social exclusion. Economica, 74(296), 777-803.
15. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
16. Bourdieu, P. (1990). Structures, habitus, practices. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), The logic of practice (pp. 52-79). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Braveman, P. A., Cubbin, C., Egerter, S., Chideya, S., Marchi, K. S., Metzler, M., et al (2005). Socioeconomic status in health research. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(22), 2879-2888.
18. Buckingham, D. (2005). The media literacy of children and young people. A review of the research literature. London, England: Ofcom.
19. Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., & Piachaud, D. (2002). Introduction. In J. Hills, J. Le Grand, & D. Piachaud (Eds.), Understanding social exclusion (pp. 1-12). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20. Chakravarty, S. R., & D'Ambrosio, C. (2006). The measurement of social exclusion. Review of Income and Wealth, 52(3), 377-398.
21. Chapman, P., Phimister, E., Shucksmith, M., Upward, R., & Vera-Toscano, E. (1998). Poverty and exclusion in rural Britain: The dynamics of low income and employment. York, England: York Publishing Services.
22. Cho, J., Gil de Zúñiga, H., Rojas, H., & Shah, D.v. (2003). Beyond access: The digital divide and internet uses and gratifications. IT & Society, 1(4), 46-72.
23. Choudrie, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2005). The demographics of broadband residential consumers in a British local community: The London Borough of Hillingdon. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 93-101.
24. CLG (Department for Communities and Local Government). (2004). The English indices of deprivation 2004. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.communities.gov.uk/archived/general-content/communities/indicesofdeprivation/216309/
25. Cole, H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). Social interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing gamers. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour, 10(4), 575-583.
26. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Commins, P. (1993). Combating exclusion in Ireland 1990-1994: A midway report. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
28. Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103-108.
29. December, J. (1996). Units of analysis for internet communication. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 14-38.
30. van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2010). Internet skills, vital assets in an information society. Enschede, the Netherlands: Twente University.
31. Didi, A., & LaRose, R. (2006). Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 193-210.
32. van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Durieux, D. (2003). ICT and social inclusion in the everyday life of less abled people. Liege, Belgium: LENTIC, University of Liege.
34. Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the internet and reported experience with the internet, by gender, in an east European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 521-536.
35. Dutton, W., Helsper, E. J., & Gerber, M. M. (2009). The Internet in Britain: 2009. Oxford, England: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
36. Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved August 2008 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html.
37. Ferguson, D. A., & Perse, E. M. (2000). The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 155-174.
38. Giddens, A. (1986). The constitution of society: Outline of theory of structuration. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
39. Gordon, D., Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Patsios, D., Payne, S., Townsend, P., et al. (2000). Poverty and social exclusion in Britain. York, England: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
40. Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1(1), 201-233.
41. Haddon, L. (2000). Social exclusion and information and communication technologies: Lessons from studies of single parents and the young elderly. New Media & Society, 2(4), 387-406.
42. Hamelink, C. (1997). New information and communication technologies, social development and cultural change. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
43. Harris, R. W. (1999). Attitudes towards end-user computing: A structural equation model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18(2), 109-125.
44. Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18(5), 385-401.
45. Heeks, R. (2010). Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development? Journal of International Development, 22(5), 625-640.
46. Helsper, E. J. (2008). Digital inclusion: An analysis of social disadvantage and the information society. London, England: Communities and Local Government.
47. Helsper, E. J. (2010). Gendered internet use across generations and life stages. Communication Research, 37(3), 352-374.
48. Helsper, E. J., & Galacz, A. (2009). Understanding the links between social and digital inclusion in Europe. In G. Cardoso, A. Cheong, & J. Cole (Eds.), The worldwide internet: Changing societies, economies and cultures (pp. 146-178). Taipa: University of Macau Press.
49. Helsper, E. J., & Gerber, M. (2012). The plausibility of cross-cultural comparisons of Internet use types. The Information Society: An International Journal 28(2), 83-98.
50. Hinson Langford, C. P., Bowsher, J., Moloney, J. P., & Lilis, P. P. (1997). Social support a conceptual analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(1), 95-100.
51. Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based study. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655-672.
52. Hunt, J. (2005). Combating Social Exclusion: The EU's contribution. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 27(1), 113-120.
53. Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). The racial digital divide: Motivational, affective, and cognitive correlates of Internet use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(10), 2019-2046.
54. Jackson, L. A., von Eye, A., Biocca, F. A., Barbatsis, G., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (2006). Does home Internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children? Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 429-434.
55. Jung, J.-Y., Qiu, J. L., & Kim, Y.-C. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the divide. Communication Research, 28(4), 507-535.
56. Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding social networks. Theories, concepts and findings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57. Kaufman, A. S., & Lichtenberger, E. O. (2006). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
58. Kavanaugh, A. L., Reese, D. D., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2005). Weak ties in networked communities. The Information Society, 21(2), 119-131.
59. Kingston, P. W. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of cultural capital theory. Sociology of Education, 74, 88-99.
60. Kirk, B. A., Schutte, N. S., & Hine, D. W. (2008). Development and preliminary validation of an emotional self-efficacy scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(5), 432-436.
61. Kirkup, G., & Kirkwood, A. (2005). Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching: A tale of gradualism rather than revolution. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 185-199.
62. Klimmt, C., Schmid, H., & Orthmann, J. (2009). Exploring the enjoyment of playing browser games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 231-234.
63. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.
64. Lin, N. (2001). Building a theory of social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3-30). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
65. Livingstone, S. (2003). Children's use of the internet: Reflections on the emerging research agenda. New Media & Society, 5(2), 147-166.
66. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671-96.
67. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: The role of online skills and family context. New Media & Society, 12(2), 309-329.
68. Livingstone, S., & Millwood-Hargrave, A. (2006). Harm and offence in media content: A review of the evidence. Bristol, England: Intellect Press.
69. Loader, B. (1998). Cyberspace divide: Equality, agency, and policy in the information society. In B. Loader (Ed.), Cyberspace divide: Equality, agency, and policy in the information society. New York, NY: Routledge.
70. Loader, B., & Keeble, L. (2004). A literature review of community informatics initiatives. York, England: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
71. Lüders, M. H., Brandtzæg, P. B., & Dunkels, E. (2009). Risky contacts. In S. Livingstone, & L. Haddon (Eds.), Kids online (pp. 123-134). Bristol, England: Policy Press.
72. Maccoby, E. F. (2007). Historical overview of socialization research and theory. In J. E. Crussec, & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 13-42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
73. McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999a). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part I: Cross-disciplinary conceptualizations of access. Information Processing and Management, 35(1), 45-76.
74. McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999b). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part II: Unique and integrating conceptualizations. Information Processing and Management, 35(1), 77-99.
75. Mumtaz, S. (2001). Children's enjoyment and perception of computer use in the home and the school. Computers in Education, 36(4), 347-362.
76. Noble, M., Wright, G., Smith, G., & Dibben, C. (2006). Measuring multiple deprivation at the small-area level. Environment and Planning, 38(1), 169-185.
77. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide. Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide (2006 reprint edition). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
78. O'Reilly, P. (1988). Methodological issues in social support and social network research. Social Science & Medicine, 26(8), 863-873.
79. Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2008). Desperately seeking the 'IT' in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. In J. L. King, & K. Lyytinen (Eds.), Information systems: The state of the field (pp. 19-42). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
80. Oxford Internet Institute (2008). OxIS review meeting: Questionnaire design. Oxford, England: Oxford Internet Institute.
81. Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196.
82. Percy-Smith, J. (2000). Introduction: The contours of social exclusion. In J. Percy-Smith (Ed.), Policy responses to social exclusion. Towards inclusion? (pp. 1-21). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
83. Perse, E. M., & Dunn, D. G. (1998). The utility of home computers and media use: Implications of multimedia and connectivity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 435-456.
84. Phipps, L. (2000). New communication technologies: A conduit for social inclusion. Information communication and society, 3(1), 39-68.
85. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
86. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 28(4), 664-683.
87. Roid, G. (2003). Stanford-Binet intelligence scales (5th ed.). Chicago, IL: Riverside.
88. Room, G. J. (1999). Social exclusion, solidarity and the challenge of globalization. International Journal of Social Welfare, 8(3), 166-174.
89. Rubin, A. M. (2002). Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. In J. Bryant, & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 525-548). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90. Russell, D. (1996). The UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20-40.
91. Sallaz, J. J., & Savizca, J. R. (2007). Pierre Bourdieu in American sociology, 1980-2005. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 21-41.
92. Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1055-1085.
93. Selwyn, N. (2004a). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341-362.
94. Selwyn, N. (2004b). Technology and social inclusion [Review of the book Technology and social inclusion, by M. Warschauer]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 127-127.
95. Selwyn, N. (2006). Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers. Poetics, 34(4-5), 273-292.
96. Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., & Williams, S. (2001). Digital divide or digital opportunity? The role of technology in overcoming social exclusion in US education. Educational Policy, 15(2), 258-277.
97. Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
98. Sen, A. (2004). Capabilities, lists, and public reason: Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics, 10(3), 77-80.
99. SETF (Social Exclusion Task Force). (2007). The multidimensional analysis of social exclusion. Retrieved August 2008 from http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/social_exclusion_task_force/publications/multidimensional.aspx.
100. Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In R. Mansell, & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 44-74). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
101. Slevin, J. (2000). The internet and society. Malden, MA: Polity.
102. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
103. Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., McNulty, J. L., Arbisi, P. A., Graham, J. R., & Kaemmer, B. (2003). MMPI-2 restructured clinical (RC) scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
104. Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. P. (2002). Effects of training on internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 479-495.
105. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
106. Walzer, M. (1985). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
107. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
108. Weber, M. (1991). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (Translated by Gerth, H. H., Wright Mills, C.). London, England: Routledge.
109. Weiser, E. B. (2000). Gender differences in internet use patterns and internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(2), 167-178.
110. Wellman, B., Boase, J., & Chen, W. (2002). The networked nature of community online and offline. IT & Society, 1(1), 151-165.
111. Whitely, B. (1997). Gender differences in computer related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(1), 1-22.
112. Witte, J. C., & Mannon, S. E. (2010). The internet and social inequalities. New York, NY: Routledge.
113. Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections: Joining together in America's fragmented communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
114. Yang, B., & Lester, D. (2003). Liaw's scales to measure attitudes toward computers and the internet. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(2), 384-434.
115. Yung, J. Y., Qiu, J. L., & Kim, Y. C. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the divide. Communication Research, 28(4), 507-535.
116. Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274-291.