Digital living: The impact (or otherwise) of the Internet on everyday life

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn , Issue 3, 2001, Pages 456-475

  Anderson, Ben ^a   Tracey, Karina ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035538802     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00027640121957295     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Akselsen, S., Gunnarsdóttir, S., Jones, M., Julsrud, T., Marion, R., Martins, M. P., & Yttri, B. (2000). The impacts of telework on quality of life - Preliminary results from the EURESCOM Project 904. Paper presented at the Conference 2000 and Beyond: Teleworking and the Future of (Tele)Work, Stockholm, Sweden.
2. Anderson, B., McWilliam, A., Lacohée, H., Clucas, E., & Gershuny, J. (1999). Family life in the digital home - Domestic telecommunications at the end of the 20th century. BT Technology Journal, 17(1), 85-97.
3. Edwards, P. (1994). From "impact" to social process: Computers in society and culture. In S. Jasanoff et al. (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 257-285). Newbury ark, CA: Sage.
4. Gershuny, J. (1983). Social innovation and the division of labour. London: OU.
5. Kling, R. (2000). Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. Information Society, 16(3), 217-232.
6. Kraut, R. (Ed.). (1998). The Internet@Home [Special Issue]. Communications of the ACM, 39(12).
7. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
8. Lacohée, H., & Anderson, B. (2001). Interacting with the telephone. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 665-699.
9. Mansell, R., & Silverstone, R. (Eds.). (1996). Communication by design. London: OU.
10. Nafus, D., & Tracey, K. (in press). The more things change: Mobile phone consumption and concepts of personhood. In J. Katz & M. Aarhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Nie, N., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report (Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society) [Online]. Available: http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/Press_Release/Preliminary_Report.pdf
12. Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2000). Results from the July National Statistics Omnibus Survey [Online]. Available: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/inter0900.pdf
13. Patterson, R., & Wilson, E. J., III. (2000). New IT and social inequality: Resetting the research and policy agenda. Information Society, 16(1), 77-86.
14. Silva, E. (2000). The politics of consumption @ home: Practices and dispositions in the uses of technologies. In Pavis papers in social and cultural research [Online]. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University. Available: http://www.open.ac.uk/socialsciences/staff/ebsilva/info.html
15. Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In R. Mansell & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by design (pp. 44-74). London: OU.
16. Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1991). Listening to a long conversation: An ethnographic approach to the study of information and communication technologies in the home. Cultural Studies, 5(2), 204-227.
17. Smith, M., & Marx, L. (Eds.). (1994). Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Tracey, K., & Anderson, B. (in press). The significance of lifestage and lifestyle transitions in the use and disuse of Internet applications and services. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.