The Plausibility of Cross-National Comparisons of Internet Use Types

Information Society

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 83-98

  Helsper, Ellen ^a   Gerber, Monica M ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cross national comparisons; factorial invariance; Internet use; methodology; uses and gratifications

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858172517     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2011.650294     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Anderson, B. and Tracey, K. 2001. Digital living-The impact (or otherwise) of the Internet on everyday life. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3): 456-75.
2. Ang, I. 2006. "On the politics of empirical audience research". In Media and cultural studies: KeyWorks, Edited by: Durham, N. G. and Kellner, D. M. 174-94. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
3. Barbosa-Leiker, C., Wright, B. R., Burns, G. L., Parks, C. D. and Strand, P. S. 2011. Longitudinal measurement invariance of the metabolic syndrome: Is the assessment of the metabolic syndrome stable over time?. Annals of Epidemiology, 21(2): 111-17.
4. Bartholomew, D. J., Moustaki, I., Galbraith, J. and Steele, F. 2008. Analysis of multivariate social science data, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
5. Benedict, J., Steenkamp, E. M. and Baumgartner, H. 1998. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1): 78-107.
6. Blake, B. F. and Neuendorf, K. 2004. Cross-national differences in website appeal: A framework for assessment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 9 Available at:http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue4/blake_neuendorf.html#ss4 (accessed April 2010)
7. Boyd, D. and Ellison, N. 2008. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13(1): 210-30.
8. Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. 1993. "Alternative ways of assessing model fit". In Testing structural equation models, Edited by: Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S. 136-62. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9. Byrne, B. 2001. Structural equation modeling with AMOS, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Byrne, B., Shavelson, R. and Muthen, B. 1989. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3): 456-66.
11. Byrne, B. M. and Stewart, S. M. 2006. The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2): 287-321.
12. Center for the Digital Future. 2009. The digital future report, Los Angeles: USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future.
13. Chen, F. F. 2007. Sensitivity of goodness of fit Indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling, 14(3): 464-504.
14. Chen, W., Boase, J. and Wellman, B. 2002. "The global villagers: Comparing Internet users and uses around the world". In The Internet in everyday life, Edited by: Wellman, B. and Haythornthwaite, C. 74-113. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Cho, J., Gil de Zúñiga, H., Rojas, H. and Shah, D. V. 2003. Beyond access: The digital divide and Internet uses and gratifications. IT & Society, 1(4): 46-72.
16. Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Billiet, J. and Schmidt, P. 2008. Values and support for immigration: A cross-country comparison. European Sociological Review, 24(5): 583-99.
17. Davidov, E., Schmidt, P. and Schwartz, S. H. 2008. Bringing values back in. The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(3): 420-45.
18. Dobos, J. and Dimmick, J. 1988. Factor analysis and gratifications constructs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 32(3): 335-50.
19. Dutton, W., Helsper, E. J. and Gerber, M. M. 2009. The Internet in Britain: 2009, Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
20. Eighmey, J. and McCord, L. 1998. Adding value in the information age: Uses and gratifications of sites on the World Wide Web. Journal of Business Research, 41(3): 187-94.
21. Eurobarometer. 2010. eCommunications household survey: The results of a special Eurobarometer survey, Brussels: European Union.
22. Flanagin, A. J. and Metzger, M. J. 2001. Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27(1): 153-81.
23. Flanagin, A. J. and Metzger, M. J. 2003. The perceived credibility of personal web page information as influenced by the sex of the source. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6): 683-701.
24. Haddon, L. Methodological issues in the cross-national analysis of contextual data: The EU Kids Online project. Paper presented at the The Good, the Bad and the Challenging: The User and the Future of Information and Communication Technologies, May. Copenhagen, Denmark.
25. Hargittai, E. and Walejko, G. 2008. The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information Communication and Society, 11(2): 239-56.
26. Hasebrink, U., Ólafsson, K. and Stetka, V. 2010. Commonalities and differences. How to learn from international comparisons of children's online behaviour?. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 6(1): 9-24.
27. Heath, A., Martin, J. and Spreckelsen, T. 2009. Cross-national comparability of survey attitude measures. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(3): 293-315.
28. Helsper, E. J. 2008. Digital inclusion: An analysis of social disadvantage and the information society, London: Communities and Local Government.
29. Helsper, E. J. 2010. Gendered Internet use across generations and life stages. Communication Research, 37(3): 352-74.
30. Helsper, E. J. and Eynon, R. 2010. Digital natives: Where is the evidence?. British Educational Research Journal, 36(3): 503-20.
31. Helsper, E. J. and Galacz, A. 2009. "Understanding the links between social and digital inclusion in Europe". In The world wide Internet: Changing societies, economies and cultures, Edited by: Cardoso, G., Cheong, A. and Cole, J. 146-78. Taipa: University of Macau Press.
32. Hermeking, M. 2005. Culture and Internet consumption: Contributions from cross-cultural marketing and advertising research [Electronic version]. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11 Available at:http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/hermeking.html (accessed June 2010)
33. Heyder, A. and Schmidt, P. 2003. "Authoritarianism and ethnocentrism in East and West Germany-Does the system matter?". In Germans or foreigners? Attitudes toward ethnic minorities in post-reunification Germany, Edited by: Alba, R., Schmidt, P. and Wasmer, M. 187-232. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Hills, P. and Argyle, M. 2003. Uses of the Internet and their relationships with individual differences in personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1): 59-70.
35. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences, comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Hoskins, C. and McFadyen, S. 1991. The U.S. competitive advantage in the global TV market: Is it sustainable in the new broadcasting environment?. Canadian Journal of Communication, 16(2): 207-24.
37. Hu, L. and Bentler, P. 1998. Fit Indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4): 424-53.
38. Ito, M., Okabe, D. and Anderson, K. 2009. "Portable objects in three global cities: The personalization of urban places". In The reconstruction of space and time mobile communication practices, Edited by: Ling, R. and Campbell, S. 67-87. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
39. Katz, J. and Aspden, P. 1997. Motivations for and barriers to Internet usage: Results of a national public opinion survey. Internet Research, 7(3): 170
40. Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Guildford Press.
41. Ksiazek, T. B. and Webster, J. G. 2008. Cultural proximity and audience behavior: The role of language in patterns of polarization and multicultural fluency. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(3): 485-503.
42. Lai, V. S. and Li, H. 2005. Technology acceptance model for Internet banking: An invariance analysis. Information & Management, 42(2): 373-86.
43. LaRose, R. and Eastin, M. S. 2004. A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3): 358-77.
44. Levy, M. R. and Windahl, S. 1984. Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11(1): 51-78.
45. Lichtenstein, A. and Rosenfeld, L. B. 1983. Uses and misuses of gratifications research. An explication of media functions. Communication Research, 10(1): 97-109.
46. Lievrouw, L. 2001. New media and the 'pluralization of life-worlds'. A role for information in social differentiation. New Media & Society, 3(1): 7-28.
47. Livingstone, S. 2008. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3): 393-411.
48. Massey, K. 1995. Analyzing the uses and gratifications concept of audience activity with a qualitative approach-Media encounters during the 1989 Loma-Prieta earthquake disaster. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(3): 328-49.
49. Medina, T. R., Smith, S. N. and Long, J. S. 2009. Measurement models matter: Implicit assumptions and cross-national research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(3): 333-61.
50. Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A. and Rayburn, J. D. 1980. Relations between gratifications sought and obtained. A study of television news. Communication Research, 7(2): 161-92.
51. Papacharissi, Z. and Rubin, A. M. 2000. Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2): 175-96.
52. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2010. Usage over time, Database. Available at:http://pewInternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data/~/media/Infographics/Trend%20Data/November%202010/UsageOverTime_11_09_10.zip (accessed December 8, 2011)
53. Raban, Y. 2004. E-living D11.1-ICT uptake and usage: Panel data analysis, Brussels: European Commission.
54. Rosengren, K. K. K. E., Palmgreen, P. and Wenner, L. A. 1985. Media gratifications research: Current perspectives, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55. Rubin, A. M. 2008. "Uses-and-gratifications perspectives on media effects". In Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 2nd ed., Edited by: Bryant, J. and Zillmann, D. 165-85. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Ruggiero, T. E. 2000. Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1): 3-37.
57. Schwartz, S. H. 2009. "Culture matters: National value cultures, sources and consequences". In Understanding culture: Theory, research and application, Edited by: Wyer, R. S., Chiu, C.-Y. and Hong, Y.-Y. 127-49. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
58. Selwyn, N. 2007. Hi-tech = Guy-tech? An exploration of undergraduate students' gendered perceptions of information and communication technologies. Sex Roles, 56(7-8): 525-36.
59. Severin, W. J. and Tankard, J. W. 2009. Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media, 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
60. Shea, T., Ariguzo, G. and White, S. D. 2007. Putting the world in the World Wide Web: The globalisation of the Internet. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 2(1): 75-98.
61. Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519-35.
62. Song, I., LaRose, R., Eastin, M. S. and Lin, C. A. 2004. Internet gratifications and Internet addiction: On the uses and abuses of new media. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(4): 384-94.
63. Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R. and Schkade, L. L. 2004. Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Journal of Decision Making, 35(2): 259-88.
64. Stares, S. 2009. Using latent class models to explore cross-national typologies of public engagement with science and technology in Europe. Science Technology & Society, 14(2): 289-329.
65. Straubhaar, J. D. 1991. Beyond media imperialism: Assymetrical interdependence and cultural proximity. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8(1): 39-59.
66. Straubhaar, J. D. 2007. World television: From global to local, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
67. Straubhaar, J. D. 2002. "(Re)asserting national television and national identity against the global, regional and local levels of world television". In In search of boundaries. Communication, nation-states and cultural identities, Edited by: Chan, J. M. and McIntyre, B. T. 181-206. Westport, CT: Ablex.
68. Teo, T. 2010. Gender differences in the intention to use technology: A measurement invariance analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6): 120-23.
69. Tong, X. 2010. A cross-national investigation of an extended technology acceptance model in the online shopping context. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 38(10): 742-59.
70. Trepte, S. 2008. Cultural proximity in TV entertainment: An eight-country study on the relationship of nationality and the evaluation of U.S. prime-time fiction. Communications, 33(1): 1-26.
71. United Nations Development Programme. 2001. Human development report. Making new technologies work for human development, New York, NY: United Nations.
72. Vandenberg, R. 2002. Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5(139): 139-58.
73. Vandenberg, R. and Lance, C. 2000. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1): 4-70.
74. Valkenburg, P. M., Schouten, A. P. and Peter, J. 2005. Adolescents' identity experiments on the Internet. New Media & Society, 7(3): 383-402.
75. Wasserman, I. M. and Richmond-Abbott, M. 2005. Gender and the Internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1): 252-70.
76. Weiser, E. B. 2000. Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(2): 167-78.
77. Wellman, B., Boase, J. and Chen, W. 2002. The networked nature of community on and off the Internet. IT and Society, 1(1): 151-65.
78. Westlund, O. 2010. New(s) functions for the mobile: A cross-cultural study. New Media & Society, 12(1): 91-108.
79. Whitaker, B. G. 2007. Internet-based attitude assessment: Does gender affect measurement equivalence?. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3): 1183-94.
80. World Bank. 2010. Internet users (per 100 people) Available at:http://www.worldbank.org
81. World Internet Project. 2009. World Internet Project report Available at:http://www.digitalcenter.org/pages/site_content.asp?intGlobalId=44
82. Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H. and Tsai, Y. M. 2009. Longitudinal invariance analysis of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4): 396-401.