Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the "divide"

Communication Research

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 507-535

  Jung, Joo Young ^a   Qiu, Jack Linchuan ^a   Kim, Yong Chan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035617880     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009365001028004006     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allen, J. P., & Turner, E. (1997). The ethnic quilt: Population diversity in Southern California. Northridge: The Center for Geographical Studies California State University.
2. Anderson, R. H., Bikson, T. K., Law, S. A., & Mitchell, B. M. (1995). Universal access to e-mail feasibility and societal implications. Santa Monica CA: RAND.
3. Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1985). The origins of individual media system dependency: A sociological framework. Communication Research, 12, 485-510.
4. Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1998). A theory of media power and a theory of media use: Different stories, questions, and ways of thinking. Mass Communication and Society, 1(1/2), 5-40.
5. Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Gibbs, J., Gutierrez Hoyt, E., Jung, J.-Y., Kim, Y.-C., Matei, S., Wilson, M., Yuan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2000). The challenge of belonging in the 21st century: The case of Los Angeles (White Paper 1). Los Angeles: Communication Technology and Community Program, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California.
6. Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Gibbs, J., Jung, J., Kim, Y., & Qiu, L. J. (2000). The globalization of everyday life: Visions and reality (White Paper 2). Los Angeles, CA: Communication Technology and Community Program, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California.
7. Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Kim, Y-C., & Matei, S. (2001). Storytelling neighborhood: Paths to belonging in diverse urban environments. Communication Research, 28(4), 392-428.
8. Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Rokeach, M., & Grube, J. W. (1984). The great American values test: Influencing behavior and belief through television. New York: Free Press.
9. Beniger, J. (1986). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Bikson, T. K., & Panis, C.W.A. (1999). Citizens, computers, and connectivity: A review of trends. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
11. Birdsell, D., Muzzio, D., Krane, D., & Cottreau, A. (1998). Web users are looking more like America. In The public perspective [Online]. Available: http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/pubper/pp93.htm
12. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
13. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
15. Douglas, S. (1987). Inventing American broadcasting: 1899-1922. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Dutton, W. H. (Ed.). (1996). Information and communication technologies-Visions and realities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17. Fischer, C. S. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 153-181.
19. Frankel, L. R. (1982). On the definition of response rates (Special report). Port Jefferson, NY: The Council of American Survey Research Organizations.
20. Gibbs, J., Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Jung, J., Kim, Y., & Qiu, J. L. (in press). The globalization of everyday life: visions and reality. In M. Sturken, D. Thomas, & S. J. Ball-Rokeach (Eds.), Reinventing technology: Cultural narratives of technological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Goslee, S. M. (1998). Losing ground bit by bit: Low-income communities in the information age. Washington, DC: Benton Foundation.
22. Grant, A. E., Guthrie, K. K., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1991). Television shopping: A media system dependency perspective. Communication Research, 18, 773-798.
23. Hawkins, R. P., & Pingree, S. (1981). Uniform messages and habitual viewing: Unnecessary assumptions in social reality effects. Human Communication Research, 7, 291-301.
24. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1998). Bridging the racial divide on the Internet. Science, 280, 390-391.
25. Hoffman, D. L, Novak, T. P., & Schlosser, A. E. (2000). The evolution of the digital divide: How gaps in Internet access may impact electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(3) [Online]. Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue3/hoffman.html
26. Keeter, S., Kohut, A., Groves, R. M., & Presser, S. (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey [Online]. Available: http://mason.gmu.edu/∼skeeter/nonresponse.zip
27. Kraut, R. E., Scherlis, W., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1998). Social impact of the Internet. What does it mean? Communications of the ACM, 41 (12), 12-22.
28. Lazarus, W., & Mora, F. (2000). Online content for low-income and underserved Americans: The digital divide's new frontier [Online]. Available: http://www.childrenspartnership.org
29. Lenhart, A. (2000). Who's not online: 57% of those without Internet access say they do not plan to log on [Online]. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toe.asp?Report=21
30. Loges, W. E. (1994). Canaries in the coal mine: Perceptions of threat and media system dependency relations. Communication Research, 21(1), 5-23.
31. McLeod, J. M., Daily, K., Guo, Z., Eveland, W. P., Jr., Bayer, J., Yang, S., & Wang, H. (1996). Community integration, local media use and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23, 179-209.
32. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communications in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Matei, S., Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Wilson, M., Gibbs, J., & Gutierrez Hoyt, E. (in press). Metamorphosis: Field research methodology for studying communication technology and community. Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronique de Communication.
34. Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences, and cultural studies. New York: Routledge.
35. Morrisett, L. (1997, December 19). Applying "Universal Services" to the Net: A U.S. Imperative. Christian Science Monitor [Online]. Available: http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/1997/12/19/opin/opin.4.html
36. Moy, P., Scheufele, D. A., & Holbert, R. L. (1999). Television use and social capital: Testing Putnam's time displacement hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 2(1/2), 27-45.
37. National Telecommunication and Information Administration. (1999). Falling through the Net III: Defining the digital divide [Online]. Available: http://www.digitaldivide.gov/reports.htm
38. National Telecommunication and Information Administration. (2000). Falling through the Net: Toward digital inclusion [Online]. Available: http://www.digitaldivide.gov/reports.htm
39. Neu, C. R., Anderson, R. H., & Bikson, T. K. (1998). E-mail communication between government and citizens: Security, policy issues, and next steps [Online]. Available: http://www.rand.org/publications/IP/IP178
40. Nie, N, & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society.
41. Norris, P. (1996). Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. PS: Political Science & Politics, 29, 474-480.
42. Norris, P. (1998). Virtual democracy. Harvard International Journal of Press / Politics, 3, 1-4.
43. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide?: Civic engagement, information poverty, & the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Papadakis, M. C. (2000). Complex picture of computer use in the home emerges [Online]. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/issuebrf/ib00314.htm
45. Powell, M. K. (2001, February 6). Press briefing [Online]. Available: http://www.fcc.gov/
46. Robinson, J. P., Kestnbaum, M., Neustadtl, A., & Alvarez, A. (2000). Mass media use and social life among Internet users. Social Science Computer Review, 18(4), 490-501.
47. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
48. Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York: Free Press.
49. Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Yoon, S.-H. (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28(4), 464-508.
50. Silverstone, R. (1999). Why study the media? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Skumanich, S. A., & Kintsfather, D. P. (1998). Individual media dependency relations within television shopping programming: A causal model reviewed and revised. Communication Research, 25(2), 200-219.
52. Thierer, A. D. (2000). How free computers are filling the digital divide [Online]. Available: http://www.heritage.org/library/backgrounder/ bg1361es.html
53. UCLA Internet Report. (2000). Surveying the digital future. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Communication Policy.
54. Wilhelm, A. G. (2000). Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.