Highly crosslinked polyethylene does not reduce aseptic loosening in cemented THA 10-year findings of a randomized study

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3083-3093

  Johanson, Per Erik ^a   Digas, Georgios ^b   Herberts, Peter ^a   Thanner, Jonas ^c   Kärrholm, Johan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b Xanthi Hospital   (Greece)

^c SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGHY CROSSLINKED POLYETHYLENE; POLYETHYLENE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACETABULUM PROSTHESIS; ADULT; AGED; BONE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; FEMALE; FEMUR STEM PROSTHESIS; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVISION SURGERY; SURGERY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 84867574676     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2400-x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (56)

1. Baxter RM, Ianuzzi A, Freeman TA, Kurtz SM, Steinbeck MJ Distinct immunohistomorphologic changes in periprosthetic hip tissues from historical and highly crosslinked UHMWPE implant retrievals. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;95:68-78.
2. Bitsch RG, Loidolt T, Heisel C, Ball S, Schmalzried TP Reduction of osteolysis with use of Marathon cross-linked polyethylene: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1487-1491.
3. Boss JH, Misselevich I, Behar J, Mendes DG. Histologic analysis of the periprosthetic tissues of long-term surviving cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1996;6:73-90.
4. Callaghan JJ, Cuckler JM, Huddleston JI, Galante JO. How have alternative bearings (such as metal-on-metal, highly cross-linked polyethylene, and ceramic-on-ceramic) affected the prevention and treatment of osteolysis? J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16, 5 (suppl 1) S33-S38.
5. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Ramakrishnan R, Naughton M Continued improved wear with an annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:825-830.
6. Catelas I, Wimmer MA, Utzschneider S. Polyethylene and metal wear particles: characteristics and biological effects. Semin Immunopathol. 2011;33:257-271.
7. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; 121:20-32.
8. Digas G, Karrholm J, Olofsson K. Five-year DEXA study of 88 hips with cemented femoral stem: influence of design variations on early migration of a cemented stem in THA. Int Orthop 2009;33:1495-1500.
9. Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J. Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement: repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:218-226.
10. Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J, Herberts P. 5-year experience of highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented and uncemented sockets: two randomized studies using radiostereometric analysis Acta Orthop. 2007;78:746-754.
11. Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented THA: randomized study of 61 hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:126-138.
12. Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P. The Otto Aufranc Award. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: randomized evaluation of penetration rate in cemented and uncemented sockets using radiostereometric analysis Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:6-16.
13. Dorr LD, Wan Z. Ten years of experience with porous acetabular components for revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 319:191-200.
14. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:649-661.
15. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: concerns about some newer implants. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:402-412.
16. Fukui K, Kaneuji A, Sugimori T, Ichiseki T, Kitamura K, Matsumoto T. Wear comparison between a highly cross-linked polyethylene and conventional polyethylene against a zirconia femoral head: minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26:45-49.
17. Garcia-Rey E, Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Ortega- Chamarro J. New polyethylenes in total hip replacement: a prospective, comparative clinical study of two types of liner. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:149-153.
18. Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gill HS, Murray DW. The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:556-561.
19. Grose A, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Bullough P, Lyman S, Tomek I, Pellicci P. High failure rate of a modern, proximally roughened, cemented stem for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2006;30: 243-247.
20. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17-27.
21. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An endresult study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737-755.
22. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71: 111-121.
23. Illgen RL 2nd, Bauer LM, Hotujec BT, Kolpin SE, Bakhtiar A, Forsythe TM. Highly crosslinked vs conventional polyethylene particles: relative in vivo inflammatory response. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:117-124.
24. Illgen RL 2nd, Forsythe TM, Pike JW, Laurent MP, Blanchard CR. Highly crosslinked vs conventional polyethylene particles - an in vitro comparison of biologic activities. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:721-731.
25. Ingham E, Fisher J. The role of macrophages in osteolysis of total joint replacement. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1271-1286.
26. Ingham E, Fisher J, Rubash HE, Sinha RK, Shanbhag AS, Kim SY. Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement: pathogenesis of bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2000;214:21-37.
27. Ishiguro N, Kojima T, Ito T, Saga S, Anma H, Kurokouchi K, Iwahori Y, Iwase T, Iwata H. Macrophage activation and migration in interface tissue around loosening total hip arthroplasty components. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;35:399-406.
28. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, O'Connor DO, Haire T, Harris WH. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73: 551-558.
29. Kärrholm J, Razaznejad R. Fixation and bone remodeling around a low stiffness stem in revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:380-388.
30. Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2262-2277.
31. Leung SB, Egawa H, Stepniewski A, Beykirch S, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA Sr. Incidence and volume of pelvic osteolysis at early follow-up with highly cross-linked and noncross-linked polyethylene J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:134-139.
32. Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:518-528.
33. Martell JM, Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1635-1641.
34. McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Chess DG, Charron KD. Wear rate of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:773-782.
35. McKellop H, Shen FW, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R. Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res 1999;17:157-167.
36. Mjoberg B. Theories of wear and loosening in hip prostheses: wear-induced loosening vs loosening-induced wear - a review Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:361-371.
37. Murray DW, Rushton N. Macrophages stimulate bone resorption when they phagocytose particles. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72:988-992.
38. Mutimer J, Devane PA, Adams K, Horne JG. Highly crosslinked polyethylene reduces wear in total hip arthroplasty at 5 years Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3228-3233.
39. Olyslaegers C, Defoort K, Simon JP, Vandenberghe L. Wear in conventional and highly cross-linked polyethylene cups: a 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:489-494.
40. Oparaugo PC, Clarke IC, Malchau H, Herberts P. Correlation of wear debris-induced osteolysis and revision with volumetric wear-rates of polyethylene: a survey of 8 reports in the literature Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:22-28.
41. Periasamy K, Watson WS, Mohammed A, Murray H, Walker B, Patil S, Meek RM. A randomised study of peri-prosthetic bone density after cemented versus trabecular fixation of a polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1033- 1044.
42. Purdue PE, Koulouvaris P, Nestor BJ, Sculco TP. The central role of wear debris in periprosthetic osteolysis. HSS J. 2006;2:102-113.
43. Rajadhyaksha AD, Brotea C, Cheung Y, Kuhn C, Ramakrishnan R, Zelicof SB. Five-year comparative study of highly crosslinked (Crossfire) and traditional polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:161-167.
44. Ranstam J, Ryd L, Onsten I. Erratum: Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles (Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica (1999) 70 4 (319-321)). Acta Orthop Scand. 2000; 71:106-108.
45. Ries MD, Pruitt L. Effect of cross-linking on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:149-156.
46. Rohrl SM, Li MG, Nilsson KG, Nivbrant B. Very low wear of non-remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene cups: an RSA study lasting up to 6 years. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:739-745.
47. Rohrl SM, Nivbrant B, Nilsson KG. No adverse effects of submelt- annealed highly crosslinked polyethylene in cemented cups Acta Orthop. 2012;83:148-152.
48. Schmalzried TP, Dorey FJ, McKellop H. The multifactorial nature of polyethylene wear in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1234-1243.
49. Schmalzried TP, Kwong LM, Jasty M, Sedlacek RC, Haire TC, O'Connor DO, Bragdon CR, Kabo JM, Malcolm AJ, Harris WH The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:60-78.
50. Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Acta Radiol 1990;31:113-126.
51. Sundfeldt M, Carlsson LV, Johansson CB, Thomsen P, Gretzer C Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:177-197.
52. Thomas GE, Simpson DJ, Mehmood S, Taylor A, McLardy- Smith P, Gill HS, Murray DW, Glyn-Jones S. The seven-year wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:716-722.
53. Triclot P, Grosjean G, El Masri F, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M A comparison of the penetration rate of two polyethylene acetabular liners of different levels of cross-linking: a prospective randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1439-1445.
54. Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Bö rlin N, Kärrholm J Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:563-572.
55. Venesmaa PK, Kroger HP, Jurvelin JS, Miettinen HJ, Suomalainen OT, Alhava EM, Yli-Kyyny T, Tamminen I, Syri J, Venesmaa P, Kroger H. Periprosthetic bone loss after cemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective 5-year dual energy radiographic absorptiometry study of 15 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2003;74:31-36.
56. Zhang HY, Blunt L, Jiang XQ, Brown L, Barrans S, Zhao Y Femoral stem wear in cemented total hip replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008;222:583-592