Fixation and bone remodeling around a low stiffness stem in revision surgery

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 466, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 380-388

  Kärrholm, Johan ^a   Razaznejad, Reza ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CHROMIUM; COBALT; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYMER; TITANIUM; CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; HIP; HUMAN; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RIGIDITY; STEREOMETRY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM;

EID: 41949110846     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0039-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Akhavan S, Matthiesen MM, Schulte L, Penoyar T, Kraay MJ, Rimnac CM, Goldberg VM. Clinical and histologic results related to a low-modulus composite total hip replacement stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1308-1314.
2. Aldinger PR, Sabo D, Pritsch M, Thomsen M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Breusch SJ. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;73:115-121.
3. Ang KC, Das De S, Goh JC, Low SL, Bose K. Periprosthetic bone remodeling after cementless total hip replacement. A prospective comparison of two different implant designs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:675-679.
4. Börlin N, Röhrl SM, Bragdon CR. RSA wear measurements with or without markers in total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech. 2006;39:1641-1650.
5. Brodner W, Bitzan P, Lomoschitz F, Krepler P, Jankovsky R, Lehr S, Kainberger F, Gottsauner-Wolf F. Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:20-26.
6. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riler LH. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629-1632.
7. Bryan WJ, McCaskill BL, Tullos HS. Hip endoprosthesis stabilization with a porous low modulus stem coating: factors influencing stabilization. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;157:125-132.
8. Cabanela ME, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Impacted cancellous graft plus cement in hip revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:175-182.
9. Digas G. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005;76:3-82.
10. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:14-21.
11. Glassman AH, Crowninshield RD, Schenck R, Herberts P. A low stiffness composite biologically fixed prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:128-136.
12. Goosen JH, Castelein RM, Runne WC, Dartee DA, Verheyen CC. Long-term results of a soft interface- (Proplast-) coated femoral stem. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:585-590.
13. Grant P, Aamodt A, Falch JA, Nordsletten L. Differences in stability and bone remodeling between a customized uncemented hydroxyapatite coated and a standard cemented femoral stem A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1280-1285.
14. Gustilo RB, Pasternak HS. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:111-119.
15. Hedia HS, Shabara MA, El-Midany TT, Fouda N. Improved design of cementless hip stems using two-dimensional functionally graded materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;79:42-49.
16. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Dalstra M. Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1989;12:1255-1267.
17. Jacobsson SA, Djerf K, Gillquist J, Hammerby S, Ivarsson I. A prospective comparison of Butel and PCA hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:624-629.
18. Kärrholm J, Anderberg C, Snorrason F, Thanner J, Langeland N, Malchau H, Herberts P. Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness. A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1651-1658.
19. Kärrholm J, Herberts P, Hultmark P, Malchau H, Nivbrant B, Thanner J. Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;344:94-110.
20. Kärrholm J, Hultmark P, Carlsson L, Malchau H. Subsidence of a non-polished stem in revisions of the hip using impaction allograft. Evaluation with radiostereometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:135-142.
21. Keet GG, Runne WC. The Anaform endoprosthesis: a Proplast-coated femoral endoprosthesis. Orthopedics. 1989;12:1185-1190.
22. Kim YH. Cemented revision hip arthroplasty using strut and impacted cancellous allografts. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:726-732.
23. Leopold SS, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Jacobs JJ, Quigley LR, Galante JO. Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component. A minimum four-year follow-up study with use of a precoated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1080-1092.
24. Maistrelli GL, Fornasier V, Binnington A, McKenzie K, Sessa V, Harrington I. Effect of stem modulus in a total hip arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:43-46.
25. Matricali GA, Thibaut H, Hendrickx M, Thibaut R. Revision of total hip arthroplasty using the RM isoelastic prosthesis. Acta Orthop Belg. 1993;59(Suppl 1):374-376.
26. Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1834-1841.
27. Nagi ON, Kumar S, Aggarwal S. The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 year follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;72:55-64.
28. Nesse E, Nielsen EW, Bastian D. Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morsellized allograft-a prospective randomized study with 5 years follow up. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003;141:678-683.
29. Niinimaki T, Jalovaara P. Bone loss from the proximal femur after arthroplasty with an isoelastic femoral stem. BMD measurements in 25 patients after 9 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:347-351.
30. Niinimaki T, Puranen J, Jalovaara P. Total hip arthroplasty using isoelastic femoral stems. A seven- to nine-year follow-up in 108 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:413-418.
31. Niinimaki TJ, Puranen JP, Jalovaara PK. Revision arthroplasty with an isoelastic uncemented femoral stem. Int Orthop. 1995;19:298-303.
32. Oakes DA, Cabanela ME. Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and clinical applications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:620-628.
33. Ohta H, Kobayashi S, Saito N, Nawata M, Horiuchi H, Takaoka K. Sequential changes in periprosthetic bone mineral density following total hip arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up. J Bone Miner Metab. 2003;21:229-233.
34. Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzen H, Johnsson R, Sandquist P, Sundberg M. Early complications after one hundred and forty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morsellized allograft bone and cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1323-1328.
35. Ornstein E, Franzen H, Johnsson R, Karlsson MK, Linder L, Sundberg M. Hip revision using the Exeter stem, impacted morsellized allograft bone and cement: a consecutive 5-year radiostereometric and radiographic study in 15 hips. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:533-543.
36. Pekkarinen J, Alho A, Lepisto J, Ylikoski M, Ylinen P, Paavilainen T. Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. A high incidence of complications. Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:103-107.
37. Petersen MB, Kolthoff N, Eiken P. Bone mineral density around femoral stems. DXA measurements in 22 porous-coated implants after 5 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:432-434.
38. Petrou G, Gavras M, Diamantopoulos A, Kapetsis T, Kremmydas N, Kouzoupis A. Uncemented total hip replacements and thigh pain. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1994;113:322-326.
39. Pitto RP, Schramm M, Hohmann D, Schmidt R. Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study. Chir Organi Mov. 2001;86:87-97.
40. Rahmy AI, Gosens T, Blake GM, Tonino A, Fogelman I. Periprosthetic bone remodeling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:281-289.
41. Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. A porous polyethylene-coated femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:83-88.
42. Robinson D, Hendel D, Halperin N. Changes in femur dimensions in asymptomatic non-cemented hip arthroplasties. 20 cases followed for 5-8 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:415-417.
43. Runne WC, van Sambeek KJ, Stierum JL, van Tongerloo RB. Femoral endoprosthesis fixation with a soft, flexible low modulus stem coating. Four to six year clinical results. Orthopedics. 1989;12:529-535.
44. Schreurs BW, Arts JJ, Verdonschot N, Buma P, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2499-2507.
45. Skinner HB. Isoelasticity and total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1991;14:323-328.
46. Sköldenberg OG, Boden HS, Salemyr MO, Ahl TE, Adolphson PY. Periprosthetic proximal bone loss after uncemented hip arthroplasty is related to stem size: DXA measurements in 138 patients followed for 2-7 years. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:386-392.
47. Søballe K, Mouzin OR, Kidder LA, Overgaard S, Bechtold JE. The effects of hydroxyapatite coating and bone allograft on fixation of loaded experimental primary and revision implants. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:239-247.
48. Sörensen J, Ullmark G, Långström B, Nilsson O. Rapid bone and blood flow formation in impacted morsellized allografts: positron emission tomography (PET) studies on allografts in 5 femoral component revisions of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:633-643.
49. Sumner DR, Galante JO. Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:202-212.
50. Sumner DR, Turner TM, Igloria R, Urban RM, Galante JO. Functional adaptation and ingrowth of bone vary as a function of hip implant stiffness. J Biomech. 1998;31:909-917.
51. Trebse R, Milosev I, Kovac S, Mikek M, Pisot V. Poor results from the isoelastic total hip replacement: 14-17-year follow-up of 49 cementless prostheses. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:169-176.
52. Tullos HS, McCaskill BL, Dickey R, Davidson J. Total hip arthroplasty with a low-modulus porous-coated femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:888-898.
53. Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Börlin N, Kärrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:563-572.