New polyethylenes in total hip replacement: A prospective, comparative clinical study of two types of liner

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 149-153

  Garcia Rey E ^a,b   Garcia Cimbrelo E ^a   Cruz Pardos, A ^a   Ortega Chamarro, J ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

^b Hospital Universitario La Paz ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHYLENE OXIDE; NITROGEN; POLYETHYLENE;

ACETABULUM FRACTURE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; X RAY FILM;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; POLYETHYLENES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 39749146482     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B2.19887     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Harris WH. Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis: the problem. Clin Orthop 2001;393:66-70.
2. McKellop H, Shen FW, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R. Effect of sterilisation method and other modifications on the wear resistence of acetabular cups made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: a hip simulator study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:1708-25.
3. Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O'Connor DO, Jasty M, Harris WH. A novel method of cross-linking ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:149-60.
4. Rieker CB, Konrad R, Schön R, Schneider W, Abt NA. In vivo and in vitro surface changes in a highly cross-linked polyethylene. J Arthoplasty 2003;18(Suppl 1):48-54.
5. Greenwald AS, Bauer TW, Ries MD. Committee on hip and knee arthritis: new polys for old: contribution or caveat? J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A (Suppl 2):27-31.
6. Collier JP, Currier BH, Kennedy FE, et al. Comparison of cross-linked polyethylene materials for orthopaedic applications. Clin Orthop 2003;414:289-304.
7. Crowninshield RD, Laurent MP, Yao JQ, et al. Cross-linking to improve THR wear performance. Hip Inter 2002;12:103-7.
8. Muratoglu OK, Greenbaum ES, Bragdon CR, et al. Surface analysis of early retrieved acetabular polyethylene liners: a comparison of conventional and liners highly crosslinked polyethylenes. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:68-77.
9. McKellop HA, Shen FW, Campbell P, Ota T. Effect of molecular weight, calcium stearate, and sterilisation methods on the wear of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene actabular cups in a hip joint simulator. J Orthop Res 1999;17:329-39.
10. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Low-friction arthroplasty of the hip using alumina ceramic and cross-linked polyethylene: a 17-year follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:1220-1.
11. Digas G, Kärrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented THA: randomised study of 61 hips. Clin Orthop 2003;417:126-38.
12. Manning DW, Chiang PP, Martell JM, Galante JO, Harris WH. In vivo comparative wear study of traditional and highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:880-6.
13. Dorr LD, Wan Z, Shahrdar C, et al. Clinical performance of a Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner for total hip arthroplasty at five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:1816-21.
14. Engh CA Jr, Stepniewski AS, Ginn SD, et al. A randomised prospective evaluation of outcomes after total hip arthroplasty using cross-linked marathon and non-cross-linked Enduron polyethylene liners. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(Suppl 2):17-25.
15. Geerdink CH, Grimm B, Ramakrishnan R, et al. Crosslinked polyethylene compared to conventional polyethylene in total hip replacement: pre-clinical evaluation, in-vitro testing and prospective clinical follow-up study. Acta Orthop 2006;77:719-25.
16. Bragdon CR, Barrett S, Martell JM, et al. Steady-state penetration rates of electron beam-irradiated, highly cross-linked polyethylene at an average 45-month follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005;21:935-43.
17. Devane PA, Horne JG, Martin K, Coldham G, Krause B. Three-dimensional polyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis: factors influencing generation of polyethylene debris. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:256-66.
18. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, et al. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 1993;14:231-42.
19. Merle D'Aubigné R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1954;36-A:451-75.
20. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Harris WH, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip arthroplasty: a standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72-A:161-8.
21. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976;121:20-32.
22. Moore MS, McAuley JP, Young AM, Engh CA Sr. Radiographic signs of osseointegration in porous-coated acetabular components. Clin Orthop 2006;444:176-83.
23. Dorr LD, Wan Z. Ten years of experience with porous acetabular components for revision surgery. Clin Orthop 1995;319:191-200.
24. Martell JM, Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:1635-41.
25. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA Jr, Shah N, Engh CA Sr. Radiographic evaluation of penetration by the femoral head into the polyethylene liner over time. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:1040-6.
26. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA Jr, Yang A, Engh CA Sr. Analysis of temporal wear pattern of porous-coated acetabular components: distinguishing between true wear and so-called bedding-in. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1999;81-A:821-30.
27. Wan Z, Boutary M, Dorr LD. Precision and limitation of measuring two-dimensional wear on clinical radiographs. Clin Orthop 2006;449:267-74.
28. Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CG. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: two years of a prospective consecutive series. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70-A:337-46.
29. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979;171:17-27.
30. Goetz DD, Smith JJ, Harris WH. The prevalence of femoral osteolysis associated with components inserted with or without cement in total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76-A:1121-9.
31. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1987;69-B:45-55.
32. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Suthers KE. The case for porous-coated hip implants: the femoral side. Clin Orthop 1990;261:63-81.
33. Kim Y-H, Oh S-H, Kim J-S. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a second-generation cementless total hip prosthesis in patients younger than fifty years of age. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:109-14.
34. Grobler GP, Learmonth ID, Bernstein BP, Dower BJ. Ten-year results of a press-fit porous-coated acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:786-9.
35. Sychterz C, Claus A, Engh C. What we have learned about long-term cementless fixation from autopsy retrievals. Clin Orthop 2002;405:79-91.
36. Kim YH, Kim VE. Results of the Harris-Galante cementless hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:83-7.
37. Cruz-Pardos A, Garcia-Cimbrelo E. The Harris-Galante total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 8-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:586-97.
38. Thanner J, Kärrholm J, Malchau H, Herberts P. Poor outcome of the PCA and Harris-Galante hip prosthesis: randomised study of 171 arthroplasties with 9-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70:155-62.
39. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Madero R, Ortega-Andreu M. Total hip arthroplasty with use of the cementless Zweymüller Alloclassic system: a ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:296-303.
40. Sychterz CJ, Young AM, Engh CA. Effect of radiographic quality on computer-assisted head penetration measurements. Clin Orthop 2001;386:150-8.