Encouraging Debate on the Uniform Guidelines and the Disparate Impact Theory of Discrimination

Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 566-570

  Mcdaniel, Michael A ^a   Kepes, Sven ^a   Banks, George C ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867371085     PISSN: 17549426     EISSN: 17549434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01394.x     Document Type: Letter

References (25)

1. Albemarle Paper v. Moody. (1975). 422 U.S. at 423, 95 S.Ct. 2362.
2. Barrett, G. V. (2010, April). Applying law to the facts: The failure of Ricci in the lower courts and success in the Supreme Court. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.
3. Barrett, G. V., Doverspike, D., & Young, C. M. (2010). The special case of public sector police and fire selection. In J. C. Scott & D. H. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of workplace assessment: Selecting and developing organizational talent (pp. 437-462). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4. Barrett, G. V., Miguel, R. F., & Doverspike, D. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines: Better the devil you know. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 534-536.
5. Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence-based I-O psychology: Not there yet but now a little nearer? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 76-82. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01301.x.
6. Brink, K. E., & Crenshaw, J. L. (2011). The affronting of the Uniform Guidelines: From propaganda to discourse. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 547-553.
7. Ceci, S. J., & Papierno, P. B. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of gap glosing: When the "have-nots" gain but the "haves" gain even more. American Psychologist, 60, 149-160. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.2.149.
8. Dunleavy, E. M., Aamodt, M. G., Morgan, D. A., Gutman, A., & Cohen, D. B. (2011). Guidelines, principles, standards, and the courts: Why can't they all just get along? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 515-520.
9. Dunleavy, E. M., & Gutman, A. (2009). Fasten your seatbelts: Supreme Court to hear Ricci v. DeStefano. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 46, 31-43.
10. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971). 401 U.S.424.
11. Hanges, P. J., Aiken, J. R., & Salmon, E. D. (2011). The devil is in the details (and the context): A call for care in discussing the Uniform Guidelines. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 562-565.
12. Jacobs, R., Deckert, P. J., & Silva, J. (2011). Adverse impact is far more complicated than the Uniform Guidelines indicate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 558-561.
13. Le, H., Oh, I.-S., Shaffer, J., & Schmidt, F. L. (2007). Implications of methodological advances for the practice of personnel selection: How practitioners benefit from meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 6-15.
14. Lewis v. City of Chicago. (2010). 130 S. Ct. 2191.
15. McDaniel, M. A., Kepes, S., & Banks, G. C. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines are a detriment to the field of personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 494-514.
16. McKay, P. F., & McDaniel, M. A. (2006). A reexamination of black-white mean differences in work performance: More data, more moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 538-554. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.538.
17. Mead, A. D., & Morris, S. B. (2011). About babies and bathwater: Retaining core principles of the Uniform Guidelines. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 554-557.
18. Morris, S. B., & Lobsenz, R. E. (2000). Significance tests and confidence intervals for the adverse impact ratio. Personnel Psychology, 53, 89-111. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00195.x.
19. Outtz, J. L. (2011). Abolishing the Uniform Guidelines: Be careful what you wish for. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 526-533.
20. Reynolds, D. H., & Knapp, D. J. (2011). SIOP as advocate: Developing a platform for action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 540-544.
21. Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & Switzer, F. S. (2006). Modeling the behavior of the 4/5ths rule for determining adverse impact: Reasons for caution. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 507-522. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.507.
22. Sackett, P. R. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines is not a scientific document: Implications for expert testimony. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 545-546.
23. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Pearlman, K. (1981). Task differences as moderators of aptitude test validity in selection: A red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 166-185. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.66.2.166.
24. Sharf, J. C. (2011). Equal employment versus equal opportunity: A naked political agenda covered by a scientific fig leaf. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 537-539.
25. Tonowski, R. F. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines and personnel selection: Identify and fix the right problem. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 521-525.