Guidelines, Principles, Standards, and the Courts: Why Can't They All Just Get Along?

Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 515-520

  Dunleavy, Eric M ^a   Aamodt, Michael G ^a   Morgan, David A ^b   Gutman, Arthur ^c   Cohen, David B ^a  

^a Center for Corporate Equality   (United States)

^b DCI Consulting Group   (United States)

^c FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867589500     PISSN: 17549426     EISSN: 17549434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01383.x     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody (1975). 422 US 405.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Association of Mexican-American Educators v. State of California (2000). 231 F.3d 572.
4. Bew v. City of Chicago (2001). 252 F.3d 891.
5. Biddle, D. A. (2008). Are the Uniform Guidelines outdated? Federal guidelines, professional standards, and validity generalization (VG). The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 45, 17-23.
6. Brunet v. City of Columbus (CA6 1995). 58 F.2d 251.
7. Cohen, D. B., Aamodt, M. G., & Dunleavy, E. M. (2010). Technical advisory committee report on best practices in adverse impact analyses. Washington, DC: Center for Corporate Equality.
8. Equal Opportunity Employment Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice (1978). Uniform Guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43, 38295-38309.
9. Gillespie v. State of Wisconsin (CA7 1985). 771 F.2d 1035.
10. Griggs v. Duke Power Co (1971). 401 US 424.
11. Guardians of NY v. Civil Service Commission (CA2 1980). 630 F.2d 79.
12. Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment, measurement and prediction for personnel decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. International Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines. (2009). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 243-253.
14. Jeanneret, R. (2005). Professional and technical authorities and guidelines. In F. J. Landy (Ed.), Employment discrimination litigation: Behavioral, quantitative, and legal perspectives (pp. 47-100). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. Landy, F. J. (1986). Stamp collecting versus science: Validation as hypothesis testing. American Psychologist, 41, 1183-1192.
16. McDaniel, M. A., Kepes, S., & Banks, G. C. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines are a detriment to the field of personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 494-514.
17. Murphy, K. R. (2009). Content validation is useful for many things, but validity isn't one of them. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 453-464.
18. Police Officers for Equal Rights v. City of Columbus (CA6 1990). 916 F.2d 1092.
19. Reynolds, D., & Dunleavy, E. (2011). SIOP recommends review of Uniform Guidelines. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 49, 38-41.
20. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP). (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Author.
21. Williams v. Ford Motor Company (1999). 187 F.3d 533.