The Affronting of the Uniform Guidelines: From Propaganda to Discourse

Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 547-553

  Brink, Kyle E ^a   Crenshaw, Jeffrey L ^b  

^a ST JOHN FISHER COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Personnel Board of Jefferson County   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867609580     PISSN: 17549426     EISSN: 17549434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01390.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Arthur, W., Jr., & Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435-442. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.435.
3. Biddle, D. A. (2008). Are the uniform guidelines outdated? Federal guidelines, professional standards, and validity generalization (VG). The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 45, 17-23.
4. Biddle, D. A. (2010). Should employers rely on local validation studies or validity generalization (VG) to support the use of employment tests in Title VII situations? Public Personnel Management, 39, 307-326.
5. Brannick, M. T., Levine, E. L., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Job and work analysis: Methods, research, and applications for human resource management (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Staffing twenty-first-century organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 133-165. DOI: 10.1080/19416520802211461.
7. Dierdorff, E. C., Rubin, R. S., & Morgeson, F. P. (2009). The milieu of managerial work: An integrative framework linking work context to role requirements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 972-988. DOI: 10.1037/a0015456.
8. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2008). Commission meeting of March 17, 2008 on renewal of UGESP authorization under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/archive/3-17-08/transcript.html.
9. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2011). Review of existing regulations. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/regulations/index.cfm.
10. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice. (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43, 38290-39315.
11. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Office of Personnel Management, Department of Justice, Department of Labor, & Department of Treasury. (1979). Adoption of questions and answers to clarify and provide a common interpretation of the uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 44, 11996.
12. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Office of Personnel Management, Department of Justice, Department of Labor, & Department of Treasury. (1980). Adoption of additional questions and answers to clarify and provide a common interpretation of the uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 45, 29530.
13. Gatewood, R. D., Feild, H. S., & Barrick, M. (2008). Human resource selection (6th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
14. Gibson, W. M., & Caplinger, J. A. (2007). Transportation of validation results. In S. M. McPhail (Ed.), Alternative validation strategies: Developing new and leveraging existing validity evidence (pp. 29-81). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
15. Griggs v. Duke Power Company. (1971). 401 U.S. 424.
16. Heneman, H. G., III, Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). Staffing organizations (7th ed.). Middleton, WI: Mendota House.
17. McDaniel, M. A., Kepes, S., & Banks, G. C. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines are a detriment to the field of personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 494-514.
18. McKay, P. F., & McDaniel, M. A. (2006). A reexamination of black-white mean differences in work performance: More data, more moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 538-554. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.538.
19. McPhail, S. M. (2007). Development of validation evidence. In S. M. McPhail (Ed.), Alternative validation strategies: Developing new and leveraging existing validity evidence (pp. 1-25). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
20. Newman, D. A., Hanges, P. J., & Outtz, J. L. (2007). Racial groups and test fairness, considering history and contruct validity. American Psychologist, 62, 1082-1083. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.1082.
21. Outtz, J. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010). A theory of adverse impact. In J. L. Outtz (Ed.), Adverse impact: Implications for organizational staffing and high stakes selection (pp. 53-94). New York, NY: Routledge.
22. Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 373-406.
23. Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2012). Strategic staffing (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
24. Ployhart, R. E., & Holtz, B. C. (2008). The diversity-validity dilemma: Strategies for reducing racioethnic and sex subgroup differences and adverse impact in selection. Personnel Psychology, 61, 153-172.
25. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529-540.
26. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
27. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP). (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Author.
28. Stelly, D. J., & Goldstein, H. W. (2007). Application of content validation methods to broader constructs. In S. M. McPhail (Ed.), Alternative validation strategies: Developing new and leveraging existing validity evidence (pp. 252-316). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.