Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe triticeae (gramineae)

Systematic Biology

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 524-545

  Mason Gamer, Roberta J ^a   Kellogg, Elizabeth A ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gramineae; Incongruence length difference test; Permutation test; Phylogenetic congruence; Poaceae; T PTP test; Triticeae; Wilcoxon signed ranks test

Indexed keywords

POACEAE; TRITICEAE;

EID: 0030311441     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/45.4.524     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. ALBERT, V. A., B. D. MISHLER, AND M. W. CHASE. 1992. Character-state weighting for restriction site data in phylogenetic reconstruction, with an example from chloroplast DNA. Pages 369-401 in Molecular systematics of plants (P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. Doyle, eds.). Chapman and Hall, New York.
2. BARRETT, M., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND E. SOBER. 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:486-493.
3. BARRETT, M., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND E. SOBER. 1993. Crusade? A reply to Nelson. Syst. Biol. 42:216-217.
4. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
5. CHEVARRÍA, G., AND J. M. CARPENTER. 1994. "Total evidence" and the evolution of highly social bees. Cladistics 10:229-258.
6. CHIPPINDALE, P. T., AND J. J. WIENS. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:278-287.
7. DAY, W. H. E. 1986. Analysis of quartet dissimilarity measures between undirected phylogenetic trees. Syst. Zool. 35:325-333.
8. DE QUEIROZ, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42:368-372.
9. DE QUEIROZ, A., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-682.
10. DVOŘÁK, J., H.-B. ZHANG, R. S. KOTA, AND M. LASSNER. 1989. Organization and evolution of the 5S ribosomal RNA gene family in wheat and related species. Genome 32:1003-1016.
11. EERNISSE, D. J., AND A. J. KLUGE. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1170-1195.
12. ESTABROOK, G. F., F. R. MCMORRIS, AND C. A. MEACHAM. 1985. Comparison of undirected phylogenetic trees based on subtrees of four evolutionary units. Syst. Zool. 34:193-200.
13. FAITH, D. P. 1991. Cladistic permutation tests for monophyly and nonmonophyly. Syst. Zool. 40:366-375.
14. FAITH, D. P., AND J. W. H. TRUEMAN. 1996. When the topology-dependent permutation test (T-PTP) for monophyly returns significant support for monophyly, should that be equated with (a) rejecting a null hypothesis of nonmonophyly, (b) rejecting a null hypothesis of "no structure," (c) failing to falsify a hypothesis of monophyly, or (d) none of the above? Syst. Biol. 45:580-586.
15. FARRIS, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18:374-385.
16. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
17. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570-572.
18. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies with a molecular clock. Syst. Zool. 34:152-161.
19. FLAVELL, R. B., AND M. O'DELL. 1976. Ribosomal RNA genes on homoeologous chromosomes of groups 5 and 6 in hexaploid wheat. Heredity 37: 377-385.
20. FLAVELL, R. B., AND D. B. SMITH. 1974. Variation in nucleolar organiser rRNA gene multiplicity in wheat and rye. Chromosoma 47:327-334.
21. GERLACH, W. L., AND T. A. DYER. 1980. Sequence organization of the repeating units in the nucleus of wheat which contain 5S RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 8:4851-4865.
22. GILL, B. S., AND R. APPELS. 1988. Relationships between Nor-loci from different Triticeae species. Plant Syst. Evol. 160:77-89.
23. HARRIS, S. A., AND R. INGRAM. 1991. Chloroplast DNA and biosystematics: The effects of intraspecific diversity and plastid transmission. Taxon 40:393-412.
24. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. J. BULL. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:182-192.
25. HSIAO, C., N. J. CHATTERTON, K. H. ASAY, AND K. B. JENSEN. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of the monogenomic species of the wheat tribe, Triticeae (Poaceae), inferred from nuclear rDNA (internal transcribed spacer) sequences. Genome 38:211-223.
26. HUELSENBECK, J. P., J. J. BULL, AND C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:152-158.
27. HUELSENBECK, J. P., D. L. SWOFFORD, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, J. J. BULL, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1994. Is character weighting a panacea for the problem of data heterogeneity in phylogenetic analysis? Syst. Biol. 43:288-291.
28. JAUHAR, P. P. 1988. A reassessment of genome relationships between Thinopyrum bessarabicum and T. elongatum of the Triticeae. Genome 30:903-914.
29. JAUHAR, P. P. 1990a. Dilemma of genome relationship in the diploid species Thinopyrum bessarabicum and Thinopyrum elongatum (Triticeae: Poaceae). Genome 33:944-946.
30. JAUHAR, P. P. 1990b. Multidisciplinary approach to genome analysis in the diploid species, Thinopyrum bessarabicum and Th. elongatum (Lophopyrum elongatum), of the Triticeae. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:523-536.
31. JONES, T. R., A. G. KLUGE, AND A. J. WOLF. 1993. When theories and methodologies clash: A phylogenetic reanalysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Syst. Biol. 42:92-102.
32. KELLOGG, E. A., AND R. APPELS. 1995. Intraspecific and interspecific variation in 5S RNA genes are de-coupled in diploid wheat relatives. Genetics 140: 325-343.
33. KELLOGG, E. A., R. APPELS, AND R. J. MASON-GAMER. 1996. When genes tell different stories: The diploid genera of the Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Bot. 21 (in press).
34. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae: Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
35. KLUGE, A. G., AND A. T. WOLF. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics 9:183-199.
36. LAPOINTE, F.-J., AND P. LEGENDRE. 1992. A statistical framework to test the consensus among additive trees (cladograms). Syst. Biol. 41:158-171.
37. LARSON, A. 1994. The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. Pages 371-390 in Molecular ecology and evolution: Approaches and applications (B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, eds.). Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
38. LUTZONI, F. M., AND R. VILGALYS. 1995. Integration of morphological and molecular data sets in estimating fungal phylogenies. Can. J. Bot. Suppl. 1: S649-S659.
39. MASON-GAMER, R. J., AND E. A. KELLOGG. 1995. Chloroplast DNA analysis of the monogenomic Triticeae: Phylogenetic implications and genome-specific markers. Pages 301-325 in Methods of genome analysis in plants (P. P. Jauhar, ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
40. MICKEVICH, M. F., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30:351-370.
41. MILLER, T. E., J. HUTCHINSON, AND S. M. READER. 1983. The identification of the nucleolus organiser chromosomes of diploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 65:145-147.
42. MIYAMOTO, M. M. 1985. Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics 1:186-189.
43. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND W. M. FITCH. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:64-76.
44. NELSON, G. 1993. Why crusade against consensus? A reply to Barrett, Donoghue, and Sober. Syst. Biol. 42: 215-216.
45. OLMSTEAD, R. G., AND J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:467-481.
46. PENNY, D., AND M. D. HENDY. 1985. The use of tree comparison metrics. Syst. Zool. 34:75-82.
47. PETERSON, G., AND O. SEBERG. In press. Phylogenetic analysis of the Triticeae (Poaceae) based on rpoA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
48. RODRIGO, A. G., M. KELLY-BORGES, P. R. BERGQUIST, AND P. L. BERGQUIST. 1993. A randomisation test of the null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic tree. N.Z. J. Bot. 31:257-268.
49. SANDERSON, M. J., M. J. DONOGHUE, W. PIEL, AND T. ERIKSSON. 1994. TreeBASE: A prototype database of phylogenetic analyses and an interactive tool for browsing the phylogeny of life. Am. J. Bot. Abstr. 81:183. [Internet address: http://phylogeny.harvard.edu/treebase/]
50. SCOLES, G. J., B. S. GILL, Z.-Y. XIN, B. C. CLARKE, C. L. MCINTYRE, C. CHAPMAN, AND R. APPELS. 1988. Frequent duplication and deletion events in the 5S RNA genes and the associated spacer regions of the Triticeae. Plant Syst. Evol. 160:105-122.
51. SIEGEL, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.
52. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data sets incongruent? Pages 295-333 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
53. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
54. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1995. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, beta test version 4.0 29d-31d. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
55. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND D. P. BEGLE. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. User's manual. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
56. SWOFFORD, D. L., J. L. THORNE, J. FELSENSTEIN, AND B. M. WIEGMANN. 1996. The topology-dependent permutation test for monophyly does not test for monophyly. Syst. Biol. 45:575-579.
57. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37:221-244.
58. TRUEMAN, J. W. H. 1995. Sponges, plants, and T-PTP. Syst. Biol. 44:429-434.
59. WANG, R. R.-C. 1989. An assessment of genome analysis based on chromosome pairing in hybrids of perennial Triticeae. Genome 32:179-189.
60. WANG, R. R.-C. 1992. Genome relationships in the perennial Triticeae based on diploid hybrids and beyond. Hereditas 116:133-136.
61. WANG, R. R.-C., AND C. HSIAO. 1989. Genome relationships between Thinopyrum bessarabicum and T. elongatum: Revisited. Genome 32:802-809.