Teleostean phylogeny based on osteological and myological characters;Filogenia de teleosteos basada en características osteológicas y miológicas

International Journal of Morphology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 463-522

  Diogo, Rui ^a,b,c   Doadrio, Ignacio ^b   Vandewalle, Pierre ^c  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Elopomorpha; Euteleostei; Myology; Osteoglossomorpha; Osteology; Otocephala; Phylogeny; Teleostei

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859155935     PISSN: 07179367     EISSN: 07179502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0717-95022008000300001     Document Type: Article

References (184)

1. Aguilera, O. La musculatura estriada en los peces Gymnotiformes (Teleostei-Ostariophysi): musculatura facial. Acta. Biol. Venez., 12:13-23, 1986.
2. Albert, J. S. Species diversity and phylogenetic relationships of American Knifefishes (Gymnotiformes, Teleostei). Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich., 190:1-127, 2001.
3. Albert, J. S. & Campos-da-Paz, R. Phylogenetic systematics of Gymnotiformes with diagnoses of 58 clades: a review of available data. In LR Malabarba, RE Reis, RP Vari, ZM Lucena, CAS Lucena, eds. Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 1998. pp.410-46.
4. Alexander, R. McN. Structure and function in catfish. J. Zool. (Lond.), 148:88-152, 1965.
5. Alves-Gomez, J. A., Orti, G., Haygood, M., Heiligenberg, W. & Meyer, A. Phylogenetic analysis of the South American electric fishes and the evolution of their electrogenic system: a synthesis based on morphology, electrophysiology and mitochondrial data. Mol. Biol. Evol., 12:298-318, 1995.
6. Arratia, G. Development and variation of the suspensorium of primitive catfishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi) and their phylogenetic relationships. Bonn. zool. Monogr., 32:1-148, 1992.
7. Arratia, G. Basal teleosts and teleostean phylogeny. Paleo Ichthyologica, 7:5-168, 1997.
8. Arratia, G. The monophyly of Teleostei and stem-group teleosts. Consensus and disagreements. In Arratia, G. & Schultze, H. P. Eds. Mesozoic fishes 2-Systematic and Fossil Record. München, Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, 1999. pp.265-334.
9. Arratia, G. Phylogenetic relationships of Teleostei. Past and present. Estud. Oceanol., 19:19-51, 2000.
10. Arratia, G. Mesozoic halecostomes and the early radiation of teleosts. In Arratia, G. & Tintori, A. eds. Mesozoic fishes 3-Systematic, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. München, Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, 2004. pp.279-315.
11. Arratia, G. & Schultze, H. P. The urohyal: development and homology within osteichthyans. J. Morphol., 203:247-82, 1990.
12. Begle, D. P. Relationships of the osmeroid fishes and the use of reductive characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Zool., 40:33-53, 1991.
13. Begle, D. P. Monophyly and relationships of the argentinoid fishes. Copeia, 1992:350-66, 1992.
14. Belouze, A. Compréhension morphologique et phylogénétique des taxon actuels et fossiles rapportés aux Anguilliformes (poissons, téléostéens). Doc. Lab. Geo. Lyon, 158:1-401, 2002.
15. Bishai, R. M. Cranial muscles of Mormyrus caschive (L.). Anat. Anz. Bd., 121:12-25, 1967.
16. Brosseau, A. R. The pectoral anatomy of selected Ostariophysi, II-the Characiformes. J. Morphol., 148:89-136, 1978.
17. Buckup, P. A. Relationships of the Characidiinae and phylogeny of characiform fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). In LR Malabarba, RE Reis, RP Vari, ZM Lucena, CAS Lucena, eds. Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 1998. pp.123-44.
18. Cavin, L. A new Clupavidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi) from the Cenomanian of Daoura (Morocco). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 329:689-95, 1999.
19. Chapman, W. M. The osteology and relationships of the Argentinidae, a family of oceanic fishes. J. Wash. Acad. Sci., 32:104-17, 1942.
20. Chardon, M., Parmentier, E. & Vandewalle, P. Morphology, development and evolution of the Weberian apparatus in catfish. In Arratia, G.; Kappor, B. G.; Chardon, M. & Diogo, R. Eds. Catfishes. Enfield, Science Publishers, 2003. pp.71-120.
21. Cloutier, R. & Arratia, G. Early diversification of actinopterygians. In Arratia, G. & Tintori, A. eds. Mesozoic fishes 3-Systematic, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. München, Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, 2004. pp.217-70.
22. D'Aubenton, F. Morphologie du crâne de Cromeria nilotica occidentalis Daget 1954. Bull. Inst. Fr. Afr. Noire., Sér A, 23:187-249, 1961.
23. De la Hoz, E. Définition et classification des poissons Gymnotoidei sur la base de la morphologie comparée et fonctionnelle du squélette et des muscles. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Liège, 1974.
24. De la Hoz, E. & Chardon, M. Skeleton, muscles, ligaments and swim-bladder of a gymnotid fish, Sternopygus macrurus Bloch & Schneider (Ostariophysi: Gymnotoidei). Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Liège, 53:9-53, 1984.
25. De Pinna, M. C. C. A phylogenetic analysis of the Asian catfish families Sisoridae, Akysidae and Amblycipitidae, with a hypothesis on the relationships of the Neotropical Asprenidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi). Fieldiana (Zool.), 84:1-82, 1996.
26. De Pinna, M. C. C. & Grande, T. Ontogeny of the accessory neural arch in pristigasteroid clupeomorphs and its bearing on the homology of the otophysan claustrum (Teleostei). Copeia, 2003:938-845, 2003.
27. Di Dario, F. Evidence supporting a sister-group relationship between Clupeoidea and Engrauloidea (Clupeomorpha). Copeia, 2002:496-503, 2002.
28. Di Dario, F. Homology between the recessus lateralis and cephalic sensory canals, with the proposition of additional synapomorphies for the Clupeiformes and the Clupeoidei. Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 141:257-70, 2004.
29. Dimmick, W. W. & Larson, A. A molecular and morphological perspective on the phylogenetic relationships of the othophysan fishes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 6:120-33, 1996.
30. Diogo, R. Morphological evolution, aptations, homoplasies, constraints, and evolutionary trends: catfishes as a case study on general phylogeny and macroevolution. Enfield, Science Publishers, 2004.
31. Diogo, R. & Chardon, M. Homologies between different adductor mandibulae sections of teleostean fishes, with a special regard to catfishes (Teleostei: Siluriformes). J. Morphol., 243:193-208, 2000.
32. Diogo, R.; Oliveira, C. & Chardon, M. On the osteology and myology of catfish pectoral girdle, with a reflection on catfish (Teleostei: Siluriformes) plesiomorphies. J. Morphol., 249:100-25, 2001a.
33. Diogo, R.; Oliveira, C. & Chardon, M. On the homologies of the skeletal components of catfish (Teleostei: Siluriformes) suspensorium. Belg. J. Zool., 131:93-109, 2001b.
34. Diogo, R.; Chardon, M. & Vandewalle, P. Morphological description of the cephalic region of Bagrus docmak, with a reflection on Bagridae (Teleostei: Siluriformes) autapomorphies. Neth. J. Zool., 49:207-32, 1999.
35. Diogo, R.; Chardon, M. & Vandewalle, P. Functional morphology of catfishes: movements of barbels. In Arratia, G.; Kappor, B. G.; Chardon, M. & Diogo, R. Eds. Catfishes. Enfield, Science Publishers, 2003. pp.203-20.
36. Edgeworth, F. H. The cranial muscles of vertebrates. Cambridge, University Press, 1935.
37. Elmerot, C., Arnason, U., Gojobori, T. & Janke, A. The mitochondrial genome of the pufferfish, Fugu rubripes, and ordinal teleostean relationships. Gene, 295:163-72, 2002.
38. Farris, J. S. Hennig 86, version 1.5. Distributed by the author, New York, Port Jefferson Station, 1988.
39. Filleul, A. Analyse critique des synapomorphies des Élopomorphes et analyse phylogénétique du groupe. Cybium, 24:75-83, 2000.
40. Filleul, A. & Lavoué, S. Basal teleosts and the question of elopomorph monophyly: morphological and molecular approaches. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 324:393-9, 2001.
41. Filleul, A. & Maisey, J. G. Redescription of Santanichthys diasii (Otophysi, Characiformes) from the Albian of the Santana formation and comments on its implications for Otophysan relationships. Am. Mus. Novit., 3455:1-21, 2004.
42. Fink, W. L. Basal euteleosts: relationships. In Moser, H. G.; Richards, W. J.; Cohen, D. M.; Fahay, M. P.; Kendall, A. W. & Richardson, S. L. eds. Ontogeny and systematics of fishes-Am. Soc. Ichthyol. Herpet., Special Publ. num. 1, 1984. pp.202-6.
43. Fink, W. L. Phylogenetic interrelationships of the stomiid fishes (Teleostei: Stomiiformes). Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich., 171:1-127, 1985.
44. Fink, S. V. & Fink, W. L. Interrelationships of the ostariophysan fishes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. (Lond.), 72:297-353, 1981.
45. Fink, S. V. & Fink, W. L. Interrelationships of ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei). In Stiassny, M. L. J.; Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D. eds. Interrelationships of Fishes. New York, Academic Press, pp. 209-49, 1996.
46. Fink, S. V., Greenwood, P. H. & Fink, W. A critique of recent works on fossil ostariophysan fishes. Copeia, 4:1033-41, 1984.
47. Fink, W. L. & Weitzman, S. H. Relationships of the stomiiform fishes (Teleostei), with a description of Diplophos. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 150:31-93, 1982.
48. Forey, P. L. A revision of the elopiform fishes, fossil and recent. Bull. British Mus. (Nast. Hist.), Geol., suppl., 10:1-222, 1973a.
49. Forey, P. L. Relationships of Elopomorpha. In Greenwood, P. H.; Miles, R. S. & Patterson, C. eds. Interrelationships of Fishes-Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 53, Suppl. 1. London, Academic Press, 1973b. pp.351-368.
50. Forey, P. L.; Littlewood, D. T. J.; Ritchie, P. & Meyer, A. Interrelationships of elopomorph fishes (Teleostei). In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D. eds. Interrelationships of Fishes. New York, Academic Press, 1996. pp.175-91.
51. Gayet, M. Contribuition à l'etude anatomique et systématique de l'ichthyofaune Cénomanienne du Portugal, deuxième partie: les ostariophysaires. Comun. Serv. Geol. Portugal, 67:173-90, 1981.
52. Gayet, M. Contribuition à l'etude anatomique et systématique de l'ichthyofaune Cénomanienne du Portugal, troisième partie: complèment à l'ètude des ostariophysaires. Comun. Serv. Geol. Portugal, 71:91-118, 1985.
53. Gayet, M. About ostariophysan fishes: a reply to S.V. Fink, P.H. Greenwood and W.L. Fink's criticisms. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Sec. C., 8:393-409, 1986.
54. Gegenbaur, C. Ueber das Kopfskelet von Alepocephalus rostratus Risso. Morphol. Jahrb., 4:1-42, 1878.
55. Gosline, W. A. The morphology and systematic position of the alepocephaloid fishes. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist., Zool., 18:183-218, 1969.
56. Gosline, W. A. Jaw musculature configuration in some higher teleostean fishes. Copeia, 1986:705-13, 1986.
57. Gosline, W. A. The structure and function of the dermal pectoral girdle in bony fishes with particular reference to ostariophysines. J. Zool. (Lond.), 183:329-38, 1977.
58. Gosline, W. A. The evolution of some structural systems with reference to the interrelationships of modern lower teleostean fish groups. Jap. J. Ichthyol., 27:1-27, 1980.
59. Grande, L. Recent and fossil clupeomorph fishes with materials for revision of the subgroups of clupeoids. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 181:231-372, 1985.
60. Grande, T. Phylogeny and paedomorphosis in an African family of freshwater fishes (Gonorynchiformes: Kneriidae). Fieldiana (Zool.), 78:1-20, 1994.
61. Grande, L. & Bemis, W. E. A comprehensive phylogenetic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. J. Vert. Paleontol., 18(1):1-690, 1998.
62. Grande, T. & De Pinna, M. C. C. The evolution of the Weberian apparatus: a phylogenetic perspective. In Arratia, G. & Tintori, A. eds. Mesozoic fishes 3-Systematic, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. München, Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, 2004. pp.429-48.
63. Grande, T., Laten, H. & Lopez, J. A. Phylogenetic relationships of extant esocid species (Teleostei: Salmoniformes) based on morphological and molecular characters. Copeia, 2004:743-57, 2004.
64. Grande, T. & Poyato-Ariza, F. J. Phylogenetic relationships of fossil and recent gonorynchiform fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 125:197-238, 1999.
65. Greenwood, P. H. Hyoid and ventral gill arch musculature in osteoglossomorph fishes. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool., 22:1-55, 1971.
66. Greenwood, P. H. Interrelationships of osteoglossomorphs. In Greenwood, P. H., Miles, R. S., Patterson, C. eds. Interrelationships of Fishes-Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 53, Suppl. London, Academic Press, 1973. pp.307-32.
67. Greenwood, P. H. Notes on the anatomy and classification of elopomorph fishes. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.), 32:65-103, 1977.
68. Greenwood, P. H. & Rosen, D. E. Notes on the structure and relationships of the alepocephaloid fishes. Amer. Mus. Novit., 2473:1-41, 1971.
69. Greenwood, P. H. & Lauder, G. V. The protractor pectoralis muscle and the classification of teleost fishes. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.), 41:213-34, 1981.
70. Greenwood, P. H.; Rosen, D. E.; Weitzman, S. H. & Meyers, G. S. Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bull. Am. Mus. Natl. Hist., 131:339-456, 1966.
71. Günther, K. & Deckert, K. Morphologie und Funktion des Kieferund Kiemenapparates von Tiefseefischen der Gattungen Malacosteus und Photostomias (Teleostei, Isospondyli, Stomiatoidea, Malacosteidae). Dana. Rep., 49:1-54, 1959.
72. Harold, A. S. & Weitzman, S. H. Interrelationships of the Stomiiformes. In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D. eds. Interrelationships of Fishes. New York, Academic Press, 1996. pp. 333-53.
73. Hillis, D.M. & Bull J. J. An Empirical Test of Bootstrapping as a Method for Assessing Confidence in Phylogenetic Analysis. Syst. Biol., 42:182-92, 1993.
74. Hilton, E. J. Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha). Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 137:1-100, 2003.
75. Hilton, E. J. & Bemis, W. E. Skeletal variation in shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) from the Connecticut River: implications for comparative osteological studies of fossil and living fishes. In Arratia, G. & Schultze, H.-P. eds. Mesozoic fishes 2-Systematic and Fossil Record. München, Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, 1999. pp.69-94.
76. Howes, G. J. Cranial muscles of gonorynchiform fishes, with comments on generic relationships. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.), 49:273-303, 1985.
77. Howes, G. J. & Sanford, C. P. J. Oral ontogeny of the ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis and comparison with the jaws of other salmoniform fishes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 89:133-69, 1987.
78. Inoue, J. G.; Miya, M.; Tsukamoto, K. & Nishida, M. Basal actinopterygian relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogeny of the "ancient fish". Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 26:110-20, 2003.
79. Inoue, J. G.; Miya, M.; Tsukamoto, K. & Nishida, M. Mitogenomic evidence for the monophyly of elopomorph fishes (Teleostei) and the evolutionary origin of the leptocephalus larva. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 32:274-86, 2004.
80. Ishiguro, N. B.; Miya, M. & Nishida, M. Basal euteleostean relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogenetic reality of the "Protacanthopterygii". Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 27:476-88, 2003.
81. Jessen, H. The gular plates and branchiostegal rays in Amia, Elops and Polypterus. Nobel. Symp. 4, Cur. Probl. Low. Vert. Phyl., 429-38, 1968.
82. Jessen, H. Schultergürtel und Pectoralflosse bei Actinopterygiern. Fossils Strata, 1:1-101, 1972.
83. Johnson, G. D. Monophyly of the euteleostean clades-Neoteleostei, Eurypterygii, and Ctenosquamata. Copeia, 1992:8-25, 1992.
84. Johnson, G. D. & Patterson, C. Relationships of lower euteleostean fishes. In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D. eds. Interrelationships of Fishes. New York, Academic Press, 1996. pp.251-332.
85. Jollie, M. Development of the head skeleton and pectoral girdle in Esox. J. Morphol., 147:61-88, 1975.
86. Jollie, M. Development of head and pectoral girdle skeleton and scales in Acipenser. Copeia, 1980:226-49, 1980.
87. Jollie, M. Development of the head and pectoral skeleton of Amia with a note on the scales. Gegenbaurs. Morphol. Jahrb., 130:315-51, 1984a.
88. Jollie, M. Development of head and pectoral girdle bones of Lepisosteus with a note on scales. Copeia, 1984:476-502, 1984b.
89. Jollie, M. A primer of bone names for the understanding of the actinopterygian head and pectoral girdle skeleton. Can. J. Zool., 64:365-79, 1986.
90. Kershaw, D. R. The cranial osteology of the 'Butterfly Fish', Pantodon buchholzi Peters. Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 49:5-19, 1970.
91. Kershaw, D. R. A structural and functional interpretation of the cranial anatomy in relation to the feeding of osteoglossoid fishes and a consideration of their phylogeny. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond., 33:179-252, 1976.
92. Kirchhoff, H. Functionell-anatomische untersuchung des visceralapparates von Clupea harengus L. Zool. Jahrb., 76:461-540, 1958.
93. Ladich, F. Sound-generating and-detecting motor system in catfish: design of swimbladder muscles in doradids and pimelodids. Anat. Res., 263:297-306, 2001.
94. Lauder, G. V. Evolution of the feeding mechanism in primitive actinopterygian fishes: a functional anatomical analysis of Polypterus, Lepisosteus, and Amia. J. Morphol., 163:283-317, 1980.
95. Lauder, G. V. & Liem, K. F. The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 150:95-197, 1983.
96. Lavoué, S. & Sullivan, J. P. Simultaneous analysis of five molecular markers provides a well-supported phylogenetic hypothesis for the living bony-tongue fishes (Osteoglossomorpha: Teleostei). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 33:171-85, 2004.
97. Lavoué, S.; Miya, M.; Inoue, J. G.; Saitoh, K.; Ishiguro, N. B. & Nishida, M. Molecular systematics of the gonorynchiform fishes (Teleostei) based on whole mitogenome sequences: implications for higher-level relationships within the Otocephala. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 37:165-77, 2005.
98. Lecointre, G. Molecular and morphological evidence for a Clupeomorpha-Ostariophysi sister-group relationship (Teleostei). Geobios, 19:205-10, 1995.
99. Lekander, B. The sensory line system and the canal bones in the head of some Ostariophysi. Acta Zool., 30:1-131, 1949.
100. Lenglet, G. Contribution à l'étude ostéologique des Kneriidae. Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 103:239-70, 1974.
101. Li, G. Q. A new species of Late Cretaceous osteoglossid (Teleostei) from the Oldman Formation of Alberta, Canada, and its phylogenetic relationships. In Arratia, G. & Viohl, G. eds. Mesozoic fishes-Systematic and Paleoecology. München, Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, 1996. pp.285-98.
102. Li, G. Q. & Wilson, M. V. H. Phylogeny of Osteoglossomorpha. In Stiassny, M. L. J.; Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D. eds. Interrelationships of Fishes. New York, Academic Press, 1996. pp.163-74.
103. Liu, H. Phylogenetic relationships of the Cypriniformes tested by mtDNA 12S rRNA sequence variations. Acta Gen. Sinica, 31:137-42, 2004.
104. Liu, H; Tzeng, C. S. & Teng H. Y. Sequence variations in the mitochondrial DNA control region and their implications for the phylogeny of the Cypriniformes. Can. J. Zool., 80:569-81, 2002.
105. López, J. A.; Chen, W. J. & Orti, G. Esociform phylogeny. Copeia 2004:449-64, 2004.
106. Mabee, P. M. & Noordsy, M. Development of the paired fins in the paddlefish, Polyodon spathula. J. Morphol., 261:334-44, 2004.
107. Matthes, H. A comparative study of the feeding mechanisms of some African Cyprinidae (Pisces, Cypriniformes). Bijdr. Dierk., 33:3-35, 1963.
108. Mayhew, R. L. The skull of Lepisosteus ptatostomus. J. Morphol., 38:315-46, 1924.
109. McAllister, D. E. The evolution of branchiostegals and associated opercular, gular, and hyoid bones and the classification of teleostome fishes, living and fossil. Bull. Nat. Mus. Can., 221:1-239, 1968.
110. McDowall, R. M. Relationships of galaxioid fishes with a further discussion of salmoniform classification. Copeia, 1969:796-824, 1969.
111. Mo, T. Anatomy, relationships and systematics of the Bagridae (Teleostei: Siluroidei) with a hypothesis of siluroid phylogeny. Theses Zoologicae, 17:1-216, 1991.
112. Monod, T. Sur quelques points de l'anatomie de Gonorhynchus gonorhynchus (Linné 1766). Melanges Ichthyol., 68:255-313, 1963.
113. Moritz, T. & Britz, R. Ontogeny and homology of the basipterygoid articulation in Pantodon buchholzi (Teleostei: Osteoglossomorpha). Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 144:1-13, 2005.
114. Nelson, G. J. Gill arches of teleostean fishes of the division Osteoglossomorpha. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), 47:261-77, 1968.
115. Nelson, G. J. Relationships of clupeomorphs, with remarks on the structure of the lower jaw in fishes. In Greenwood, P. H., Miles, R. S., Patterson, C. eds. Interrelationships of Fishes-Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 53, Suppl. 1. London, Academic Press, 1973. pp.333-49.
116. Nelson, J. S. Fishes of the World. Third edition. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
117. Nelson, J. S. Fishes of the World. Fourth edition. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
118. Nixon, K. C. Nona & Winclada, version 1.00.08. Published by the author, New York, Ithaca, 2002.
119. Norden, C. R. Comparative osteology of representative salmonid fishes, with particular reference to the grayling (Thymallus articus) and its phylogeny. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, 18:679-791, 1961.
120. Obermiller, L. E. & Pfeiler, E. Phylogenetic relationships of elopomorph fishes inferred from mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 26:202-14, 2003.
121. Orti, G. & Meyer, A. The radiation of characiform fishes and the limits of resolution of mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Syst. Biol., 46:75-100, 1997.
122. Orton, G. L. Notes on larval anatomy of fishes of order Lyomeri. Copeia, 1963:6-15, 1963.
123. Pasleau, F. Recherches sur la position phylétique des téléostéens Gonorynchiformes, basées sur l'étude de l'ostéologie et de myologie céphalique. Bachelor's thesis, University of Liège, 1974.
124. Patterson, C. Interrelationships of holosteans. In Greenwood, P. H.; Miles, R. S. & Patterson, C. eds. Interrelationships of Fishes-Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 53, Suppl. 1. London, Academic Press, pp. 233-305, 1973.
125. Patterson, C. The braincase of pholidophorid and leptolepid fishes, with a review of the actinopterygian braincase. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B, 269:275-579, 1975.
126. Patterson, C. The contribution of paleontology to teleostean phylogeny. In Hecht, P. C., Goody, P. C. & Hecht, B. M. eds. Major patterns in vertebrate evolution. New York, Plenum Press, pp. 579-643, 1977.
127. Patterson, C. Chanoides, a marine Eocene otophysan fish (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). J. Vert. Paleont., 4:430-56, 1984.
128. Patterson, C. & Rosen, D. E. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 158:85-172, 1977.
129. Patterson, C. & Johnson, G. D. The intermuscular bones and ligaments of teleostean fishes. Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 599:1-83, 1995.
130. Peng, Z.; Shunping, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, W. & Diogo, R. Mitochondrial molecular clocks and the origin of the major otocephalan clades (Pisces, Teleostei): a new insight. Gene, 370:113-24, 2006.
131. Poyato-Ariza, F. J. A revision of the ostariophysan fish family Chanidae, with special reference to the Mesozoic forms. Palaeo Ichthyologica, 6:1-52, 1996.
132. Ramaswami, L. S. Skeleton of cyprinoid fishes in relation to phylogenetic studies. V, the skull and gasbladder capsule of the Cobitidae. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India, Biol. Sci., 19:323-47, 1953.
133. Regan, C. T. The anatomy and classification of the teleostean fishes of the order Lyomeri. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 8:347-9, 1912.
134. Ridewood, W. G. On the cranial osteology of the clupeoid fishes. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 29:448-93, 1904a.
135. Ridewood, W. G. On the cranial osteology of the fishes of the families Elopidae and Albulidae, with remarks on the morphology of the skull in the lower teleostean fishes generally. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 2:35-81, 1904b.
136. Ridewood, W. G. On the cranial osteology of the fishes of the families Osteoglossidae, Pantodontidae, Phractolaemidae. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. (Zool.), 29:252-82, 1905a.
137. Ridewood, W. G. On the skull of Gonorynchus greyi. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 7:361-72, 1905b.
138. Rokas, A.; Williams, B. L.; King, N. & Carroll, S. B. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature, 425:798-804, 2003.
139. Rosen, D. E. Interrelationships of higher euteleostean fishes. In Greenwood, P. H.; Miles, R. S.; Patterson, C. Eds. Interrelationships of Fishes-Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 53, Suppl. 1. London, Academic Press, 1973. pp.397-513.
140. Rosen, D. E. Phylogeny and zoogeography of salmoniform fishes and relationships of Lepidogalaxias salamandroides. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 153:265-326, 1974.
141. Rosen, D. E. An essay on euteleostean classification. Am. Mus. Novit., 2827:1-45, 1985.
142. Rosen, D. E. & Greenwood, P. H. Origin of the Weberian apparatus and the relationships of the ostariophysan and gonorynchiform fishes. Am. Mus. Novit., 2428:1-25, 1970.
143. Saitoh, K., Miya, M., Inoue, J. G., Ishiguro, N. B. & Nishida, M. Mitochondrial genomics of ostariophysan fishes: perspectives on phylogeny and biogeography. J. Mol. Evol., 56:464-72, 2003.
144. Sanford, C. P. J. Salmonoid fish osteology and phylogeny (Teleostei: Salmonoidei). Theses Zoologicae, 33:1-264, 2000.
145. Sato, T. & Nakabo, T. Paraulopidae and Paraulopus, a new family and genus of aulopiform fishes with revised relationship within the order. Ichthyol. Res., 49:25-46, 2002.
146. Shaposhnikova, G. Comparative morphology of the whitefishes (Coregoninae) from the URSS. Trudy. Zool. Inst. Akad., 46:207-256, 1967.
147. Schaeffer, B. & Rosen, D. E. Major adaptive levels in the evolution of the actinopterygian feeding mechanisms. Am. Zool., 1:187-204, 1961.
148. Shen, M. Fossil "osteoglossomorphs" in East Asia and their implications in teleostean phylogeny. In Arratia, G. & Viohl, G. eds. Mesozoic fishes-Systematic and Paleoecology. München, Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, 1996. pp.261-72.
149. Siebert, D. J. Interrelationships among families of the order Cypriniformes (Teleostei). Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, City University of New York, 1987.
150. Smith, D. G. Family Anguillidae. In: Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Mem. Sears Found. Mar. Res. 1, part 9:25-47, 1989a.
151. Smith, D. G. Family Congridae. In: Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Mem. Sears Found. Mar. Res. 1, part 9:460-567, 1989b.
152. Springer, V. G. & Johnson, G. D. Study of the dorsal gill-arch musculature of teleostome fishes, with special reference to the Actinopterygii. Bull. Biol. Soc. Wash., 11:1-236, 2004.
153. Stiassny, M. L. J. The limits and relationships of the acanthomorph fishes. J. Zool. (Lond.), B, 1:411-60, 1986.
154. Stiassny, M. L. J. Basal ctenosquamate relationships and the interrelationships of the myctophiform (scopelomorph) fishes. In Stiassny, M. L. J.; Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D. Eds. Interrelationships of Fishes. New York, Academic Press, 1996. pp.405-36.
155. Stiassny, M. L. J.; Wiley, E. O.; Johnson, G. D. & de Carvalho, M. R. Gnathostome fishes. In Donaghue, M. J. & Cracraft, J. eds. Assembling the tree of life. New York, Oxford University Press, 2004. pp. 410-29.
156. Sulak, K. J. The systematics and biology of Bathypterois (Pisces, Chlorophthalmidae) with a revised classification of benthic myctophiform fishes. Galathea Rep., 14:49-108, 1977.
157. Swinnerton, H. H. The osteology of Cromeria nilotica and Galaxias attenuatus. Zool. Jahr., 18:58-70, 1903.
158. Takahasi, N. On the homology of the cranial muscles of the cypriniform fishes. J. Morphol., 40:1-109, 1925.
159. Taverne, L. Ostéologie des genres Mormyrus Linné, Mormyrops Muller, Hyperopisus Gill, Myomyrus Boulenger, Stomatorhinus Boulenger et Gymnarchus Cuvier. Ann. Mus. R. Afr. Centr., 200:1-194, 1972.
160. Taverne, L. Ostéologie d'Elops Linné, C., 1766 (Pisces, Elopiformes) et son intérêt phylogénétique. Acad. R. Belg. Mem. Classe Sci., 41:1-96, 1974.
161. Taverne, L. Ostéologie de Clupavus maroccanus (Crétacé Supérieur du Maroc) et considérations sur la position systématique et des relations des Clupavidae au sein de l'ordre des Clupeiformes sensu stricto (Pisces, Teleostei). Geobios, 10:697-722, 1977a.
162. Taverne, L. Ostéologie, phylogénèse, et systématique des téléostéens fossiles et actuels du super-ordre des ostéoglossomorphes, première partie. Ostéologie des genres Hiodon, Eohiodon, Lycoptera, Osteoglossum, Scleropages, Heterotis et Arapaima. Acad. R. Belg. Mem. Classe Sci., 41:1-235, 1977b.
163. Taverne, L. Ostéologie, phylogénèse, et systématique des téléostéens fossiles et actuels du super-ordre des ostéoglossomorphes, deuxième partie. Ostéologie des genres Phareodus, Phareoides, Brychaetus, Musperia, Pantodon, Singida, Notopterus, Xenomystus et Papyrocranus. Acad. R. Belg. Mem. Classe. Sci., 42:1-212, 1978.
164. Taverne, L. Description de l'appareil de Weber du téléosteen crétacé marin Clupavus maroccanus et ses implications phylogénétiques. Belg. J. Zool., 125:267-82, 1995.
165. o-Sorbininardus apuliensis, gen. nov., sp. nov. (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Anatophysi, Sorbininardiformes, nov. ord.). Studi e Richerche sui giacimenti terziari di Bolca VIII, Spec Vol L Sorbiri, Mus. Civ. St. Nat. Verona, 23:77-103, 1999.
166. Tchernavin, V. V. Six specimens of Lyomeri in the British Museum (with notes on the skeleton of the Lyomeri). J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool., 41:287-350, 1947a.
167. Tchernavin, V. V. Further notes on the structure of the bony fishes of the order Lyomeri (Eurypharynx). J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool., 41:387-93, 1947b.
168. Triques, M. L. Filogenia dos géneros de Gymnotiformes (Actinopterygii, Ostariophysi), com base em caracteres esqueléticos. Comun. Mus. Ciênc. PUCRS, série zool., 6:85-130, 1993.
169. Thys van den Audenaerde, D. F. E. L'anatomie de Phractolaemus ansorgei Blgr. et la position systématique des Phractolaemidae. Ann. Mus. R. Afr. Centr., 103:101-67, 1961.
170. Vandewalle, P. Contribution à l'étude anatomique et fonctionnelle de la région céphalique de Gobio gobio (L.) (Pisces, Cyprinidae), 3, les os, les muscles et les ligaments. Forma et Functio, 8:331-60, 1975.
171. Vandewalle, P. Particularités anatomiques de la tête de deux Poissons Cyprinidés Barbus barbus (L.) et Leuciscus leuciscus (L). Bull. Acad. R. Belg., 5:469-79, 1977.
172. Vari, R. P. Anatomy, relationships and classification of the families Citharinidae and Distichodontidae (Pisces, Characoidea). Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.), 36:261-344, 1979.
173. Vrba, E. S. Contributions to the functional morphology of fishes-Part V, the feeding mechanism of Elops saurus Linnaeus. Zool. Afr., 3:211-36, 1968.
174. Wang, C. H.; Kuo, C. H.; Mok, H. H. &Lee, S. C. Molecular phylogeny of elopomorph fishes inferred from mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA sequences. Zool. Scripta, 32:231-41, 2003.
175. Waters, J. M.; Lopez, J. A. & Wallis, G. P. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of galaxiid fishes (Osteichthyes: Galaxiidae): dispersal, vicariance, and the position of Lepidogalaxias salamandroides. Syst. Biol., 49:777-95, 2000.
176. Weisel, G. F. The osteocranium of the catostomid fish, Catostomus macrocheilus-a study in adaptation and natural relationship. J. Morphol., 106:109-29, 1960.
177. Weitzman, S. H. The osteology of Brycon meeki, a generalized characid fish, with an osteological definition of the family. Stanford Ichthyol. Bull., 8:1-77, 1962.
178. Weitzman, S. H. The origin of stomiatoid fishes with comment on the classification of salmoniform fishes. Copeia, 1967:507-40, 1967a.
179. Weitzman, S. H. The osteology and relationships of the Astronesthidae, a family of oceanic fishes. Dana. Rep., 71:1-54, 1967b.
180. Wilga, C. D.; Wainwright, P. C. & Motta, P. J. Evolution of jaw depression mechanisms in aquatic vertebrates: insights from Chondrichthyes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 71:165-85, 2000.
181. Wilson, M. V. H. & Veilleux, P. Comparative osteology and relationships of the Umbridae (Pisces: Salmoniformes). Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 76:321-5, 1982.
182. Wu, K. Y. & Shen, S.C. Review of the teleostean adductor mandibulae and its significance to the systematic position of the Polymixiiformes, Lampridiformes, and Triacanthoidei. Zool. Stud., 43:712-36, 2004.
183. Winterbottom, R. A descriptive synonymy of the striated muscles of the Teleostei. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. (Phil.), 125:225-317, 1974.
184. Zaragüeta-Bagils, R.; Lavoué, S.; Tillier, A.; Bonillo, C. & Lecointre, G. Assessment of otocephalan and protacanthopterygian concepts in the light of multiple molecular phylogenies. C. R. Biologies, 325:1191-207, 2002.