Phylogeny of the oriental Drosophila melanogaster species group: A multilocus reconstruction

Systematic Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 786-805

  Kopp, Artyom ^a   True, John R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diptera; Drosophila melanogaster; Evolution; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

ANIMALIA; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MELANOGASTER; SOPHOPHORA;

EID: 0036804525     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102410     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Adams, M. D., S. E. Celniker, R. A. Holt, C. A. Evans, J. D. Gocayne, et al. 2000. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287:2185-2195.
2. Ashburner, M. 1989. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
3. Ashburner, M., M. Bodmer, and F. Lemeunier. 1984. On the evolutionary relationships of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Genet. 4:295-312.
4. Baker, R. H., and R. DeSalle. 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46:654-673.
5. Baker, R. H., G. S. Wilkinson, and R. DeSalle. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of different types of molecular data used to infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Syst. Biol. 50:87-105.
6. Ballard, J. W. O., M. K. Thayer, A. F., JR. Newton, and E. R. Grismer. 1998. Data sets, partitions, and characters: Philosophies and procedures for analyzing multiple data sets. Syst. Biol. 47:367-396.
7. Barker, F. K., and F. M. Lutzoni. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51:12-24.
8. Barraclough, T. G., and S. Nee. 2001. Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:391-399.
9. Barrio, E., and F. J. Ayala. 1997. Evolution of the Drosophila obscura species group inferred from the Gpdh and Sod genes. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 7:79-93.
10. Bock, I. R. 1980. Current status of the Drosophila melanogaster species-group (Diptera). Syst. Entomol. 5:341-356.
11. Bock, I. R., and M. R. Wheeler. 1972. The Drosophila melanogaster Species Group. Univ. Texas Publ. 7213:1-102.
12. Buckley, T. R., and C. W. Cunningham. 2002. The effects of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:394-405.
13. Buckley, T. R., C. Simon, and G. K. Chambers. 2001. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: The effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support. Syst. Biol. 50:67-86.
14. Bull, J. J., J. P. Huelsenbeck, C. W. Cunningham, D. L. Swofford, and P. J. Waddell. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
15. Cannatella, D. C., D. M. Hillis, P. T. Chippindale, L. Weigt, A. S. rand, and M. J. Ryan. 1998. Phylogeny of frogs of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group, with an examination of data incongruence. Syst. Biol. 47:311-335.
16. Carvalho, A. B., B. P. Lazzaro, and A. G. Clark. 2000. Y chromosomal fertility factors kl-2 and kl-3 of Drosophila melanogaster encode dynein heavy chain polypeptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13239-13244.
17. Clark, M. A., N. Moran, P. Baumann, and J. J. Wernegreen. 2000. Cospeciation between bacterial endosymbionts (Buchnera) and a recent radiation of aphids (Uroleucon) and pitfalls of testing for phylogenetic congruence. Evolution 54:517-525.
18. DeSalle, R., and A. V. Z. Brower. 1997. Process partitions, congruence, and the independence of characters: Inferring relationships among closely related Hawaiian Drosophila from multiple gene regions. Syst. Biol. 46:751-764.
19. Dowton, M., and A. D. Austin. 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy - The behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analysis. Syst. Biol. 51:19-31.
20. Farris, J. S., M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
21. Farris, J. S., M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult, 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570-572.
22. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
23. Foster, P. G., and D. A. Hickey. 1999. Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions. J. Mol. Evol. 48:284-290.
24. Gleason, J. M., A. Caccone, E. N. Moriyama, K. P. White, and J. R. Powell. 1997. Mitochondrial DNA phylogenies for the Drosophila obscura group. Evolution 51:433-440.
25. Goldman, N., J. P. Anderson, and A. G. Rodrigo. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670.
26. Goto, S. G., and M. T. Kimura. 2001. Phytogenetic utility of mitochondrial CO1 and nuclear Gpdh genes in Drosophila. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18:404-422.
27. Goto, S. G., H. W. Kitamura, and M. T. Kimura. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships and climatic adaptations in the Drosophila takahashii and montium species subgroups. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 15:147-156.
28. Hsu, T. C. 1949. The External Genital Apparatus of Male Drosophilidae. Univ. Texas Publ. 4920:80-142.
29. Hu, Y.-G., and M. J. Toda. 2000. Polyphyly of Lordiphosa and its relationships in Drosophilinae (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Syst. Entomol. 25:1-17.
30. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2000. MrBayes: A Program for the Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny. Distributed by the author, Univ. Rochester, Rochester, New York.
31. Huelsenbeck, J. P., J. J. Bull, and C. W. Cunningham. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:152-158.
32. Inomata, N., H. Shibata, E. Okuyama, and T. Yamazaki. 1995. Evolutionary relationships and sequence variation of α-amylase variants encoded by duplicated genes in the Amy locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 141:237-244.
33. Inomata, N., H. Tachida, and T. Yamazaki. 1997. Molecular evolution of the Amy multigenes in the subgenus Sophophora of Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:942-950.
34. Johnson, K. P., and D. H. Clayton. 2000. Nuclear and mitochondrial genes contain similar phylogenetic signal for pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbiformes). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14:141-151.
35. Katoh, T., K. Tamura, and T. Aotsuka. 2000. Phylogenetic position of the subgenus Lordiphosa of the genus Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) inferred from alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 51:122-130.
36. Kishino, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
37. Kliman, R. M., P. Andolfatto, J. A. Coyne, F. Depaulis, M. Kreitman, A. J. Berry, J. McCarter, J. Wakeley, and J. Hey. 2000. The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics 156:1913-1931.
38. Kluge, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
39. Kluge, A. G., and A. J. Wolf. 1993. Cladistic: What's in a word? Cladistics 9:183-199.
40. Kopp, A., I. Duncan, D. Godt, and S. B. Carroll. 2000. Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in Drosophila. Nature 408:553-559.
41. Kopp, A., and J. True. 2002. Evolution of male sexual characters in the oriental Drosophila melanogaster species group. Evol. Dev. 4:278-291.
42. Lachaise, D., M.-L. Cariou, J.-R. David, F. Lemeunier, L. Tsakas, and M. Ashburner. 1988. Historical biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Evol. Biol. 22:159-225.
43. Lake, J. A. 1994. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: Paralinear distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1455-1459.
44. Larget, B., and D. L. Simon. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
45. Larson, A. 1994. The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. Pages 371-390 in Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications (B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, eds.). Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
46. Lemeunier, F., J.-R. David, L. Tsakas, and M. Ashburner. 1986. The melanogaster species group. Pages 147-256 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Volume 3 (M. Ashburner, J. N. Thompson, Jr., and H. L. Carson, eds.). Academic Press, London.
47. Lockhart, P. J., M. A. Steel, M. D. Hendy, and D. Penny. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-612.
48. Maddison, D. R., and W. P. Maddison. 2000. MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 4.03. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
49. Maddison, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
50. Mallatt, J., and C. J. Winchell. 2002. Testing the new animal phylogeny: First use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:289-301.
51. Miyamoto, M. M., and W. M. Fitch. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:64-76.
52. Nichols, R. 2001. Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:358-364.
53. O'Grady, P. M., J. B. Clark, and M. G. Kidwell. 1998. Phylogeny of the Drosophila saltans species group based on combined analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:656-664.
54. Okada, T. 1954. Comparative morphology of the drosophilid fly. Kuntyu 22:36-46.
55. Pelandakis, M., D. G. Higgins, and M. Solignac. 1991. Molecular phylogeny of the subgenus Sophophora of Drosophila derived from large subunit of ribosomal RNA sequences. Genetica 84:87-94.
56. Powell, J. R. 1997. Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology: The Drosophila Model. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
57. Remsen. J., and R. DeSalle. 1998. Character congruence of multiple data partitions and the origin of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:225-235.
58. Rodriguez, R., J. L. Oliver, A. Marin, and J. R. Medina. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142:485-501.
59. Rodriguez-Trelles, F., L. Alarcón, and A. Fontdevila. 2000a. Molecular evolution and phylogeny of the buzzatii complex (Drosophila repleta group): A maximum likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1112-1122.
60. Rodriguez-Trelles, F., R. Tarrio, and F. Ayala. 2000b. Evidence for a high ancestral GC content in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1710-1717.
61. Schawaroch, V. A. 2000. Molecular Phylogeny of the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group with Special Emphasis on the montium Subgroup. Ph.D. Dissertation, City Univ. New York, New York.
62. Schawaroch, V. 2002. Phylogeny of a paradigm lineage: The Drosophila melanogaster species group (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76:21-37.
63. Shibata, H., and T. Yamazaki. 1995. Molecular evolution of the duplicated Amy locus in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: Concerted evolution only in the coding region and an excess of nonsynonymous substitutions in speciation. Genetics 141:223-236.
64. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
65. Stern, D. L. 1998. The role of Ultrabithorax in morphological differences between Drosophila species. Nature 396:463-466.
66. Sucena, E., and D. L. Stern. 2000. Divergence of larval morphology between Drosophila sechellia and its sibling species caused by cis-regulatory evolution of ovo/shaven-baby. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:4530-4534.
67. Sultana, F., M. T. Kimura, and M. J. Toda. 1999. Anthophilic Drosophila of the elegans species-subgroup from Indonesia, with description of a new species (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Entomol. Sci. 2:121-126.
68. Swofford, D. L. 2000. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
69. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular Systematics, 2nd Edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
70. Tarrio, R., F. Rodriguez-Trelles, and F. Ayala. 2001. Shared nucleotide composition biases among species and their impact on phylogenetic reconstructions of the Drosophilidae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1464-1473.
71. Tautz, D., J. M. Hancock, D. A. Webb, C. Tautz, and G. A. Dover. 1988. Complete sequences of the rRNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:366-376.
72. Templeton, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37:221-244.
73. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
74. Ting, C.-T., S.-C. Tsaur, and C.-I. Wu. 2000. The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5313-5316.
75. Toda, M. J. 1991. Drosophilidae (Diptera) in Myanmar (Burma). VII. The Drosophila melanogaster species-group, excepting the D. montium species-subgroup. Orient. Insects 25:69-94.
76. True, J. R., K. A. Edwards, D. Yamamoto, and S. B. Carroll. 1999. Drosophila wing melanin patterns form by vein-dependent elaboration of enzymatic prepatterns. Curr. Biol. 9:1382-1391.
77. Yang, Z., and B. Rannala. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-724.
78. Yoder, A. D., J. A. Irwin, and B. A. Payseur. 2001. Failure of the ILD test to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50:408.424.