Hip Resurfacing With the Biomet Hybrid ReCap-Magnum System. 7-Year Results

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Gross, Thomas P ^a   Liu, Fei ^a  

^a Midlands Orthopaedics   (United States)

Author keywords

Adverse wear; Hip arthroplasty; Hip resurfacing; Hybrid fixation; Metal on metal

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL IMPLANTATION; NERVE PARALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION; RECURRENT DISLOCATION; SCIATIC NERVE INJURY; SURVIVAL RATE; TENDINITIS;

EID: 84866352316     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.049     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Mont M.A., Schmalzried T.P. Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):3.
2. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J., Campbell P.A., et al. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:2663.
3. Howie D.W., Campbell D., McGee M., et al. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990, 72:708.
4. Steffen R.T., Pandit H.P., Palan J., et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:436.
5. Schmalzried T.P., Fowble V.A., Ure K.J., et al. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Technique, fixation, and early results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 329(329 Suppl):S106.
6. Buergi M.L., Walter W.L. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(7 Suppl 3):61.
7. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:780.
8. Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Ong K., et al. future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 10:10.
9. Khan M., Kuiper J.H., Edwards D., et al. Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:1044.
10. Treacy R.B., McBryde C.W., Shears E., et al. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93:27.
11. Gross T.P., Liu F., Webb L.A. Clinical outcome of the metal-on-metal hybrid Corin Cormet 2000 Hip Resurfacing System: an up to 11-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2011.
12. Costa C.R., Johnson A.J., Naziri Q., et al. The outcomes of Cormet hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2011, 69(Suppl 1):S12.
13. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6 Suppl 1):36.
14. Mont M.A., Seyler T.M., Marker D.R., et al. Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88(Suppl 3):90.
15. Glyn-Jones S., Pandit H., Kwon Y.M., et al. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:1566.
16. Langton D.J., Joyce T.J., Jameson S.S., et al. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93:164.
17. Naal F.D., Pilz R., Munzinger U., et al. High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011.
18. Ng V.Y., Arnott L., McShane M.A. Perspectives in managing an implant recall: revision of 94 Durom Metasul acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93:e100.
19. Langton D.J., Jameson S.S., Joyce T.J., et al. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92:38.
20. Jameson S.S., Langton D.J., Nargol A.V. Articular surface replacement of the hip: a prospective single-surgeon series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92:28.
21. Langton D.J., Jameson S.S., Joyce T.J., et al. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93:1011.
22. Gross T.P., Liu F. Comparison of fully porous-coated and hybrid hip resurfacing: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. Orthop Clin North Am 2011, 42:231.
23. Gross T.P., Lu F., Webb L. Comparison of unilateral and rapidly staged bilateral hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2011, 77:203.
24. Gross T.P., Liu F. Minimally invasive posterior approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Techniques in Orthopaedics 2010, 25:39.
25. Gross T.P., Liu F., Webb L. Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469:1554.
26. Treacy R.B., McBryde C.W., Pynsent P.B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:167.
27. McBryde C.W., Theivendran K., Thomas A.M., et al. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:105.
28. Heilpern G.N., Shah N.N., Fordyce M.J. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1137.
29. Gross T.P., Liu F. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with an uncemented femoral component. A seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 2008, 3:32.
30. Lilikakis A.K., Vowler S.L., Villar R.N. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005, 36:215.
31. Amstutz H.C., Wisk L.E., Le Duff M.J. Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:198.
32. Kim P.R., Beaule P.E., Laflamme G.Y., et al. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6 Suppl 1):44.
33. Ma R., Ji S., Liu W., et al. Clinical features of the femoral head necrosis caused by gross teres ligament after reduction for the developmental dislocation of the hip. Chin Med J (Engl) 1998, 111:998.
34. Lin Z.M., Meakins S., Morlock M.M., et al. Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 1: experimental simulation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006, 220:299.
35. De Smet K.A., Van Der Straeten C., Van Orsouw M., et al. Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. Orthop Clin North Am 2011, 42(2):259.
36. Langton D.J., Joyce T.J., Mangat N., et al. Reducing metal ion release following hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2011, 42:169.
37. Gross T.P., Liu F. Prevalence of dysplasia as the source of worse outcome in young female patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2011.
38. Hulst J.B., Ball S.T., Wu G., et al. Survivorship of Conserve(R) Plus Monoblock metal-on-metal hip resurfacing sockets: radiographic midterm results of 580 patients. Orthop Clin North Am 2011, 42:153.
39. McMinn D.J., Daniel J., Ziaee H., et al. Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop 2011, 35:231.