Reducing Metal Ion Release Following Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 169-180

  Langton, David J ^a,b   Joyce, Thomas J ^b   Mangat, Navjeet ^a,c   Lord, James ^a,b   Van Orsouw, Maarten ^a,d   Smet, Koen De ^a,d   Nargol, Antoni V F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH TEES   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Northern Deanery   (United Kingdom)

^d ANCA Medical Centre   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Implant; Ion concentration; Metal ion release; Resurfacing arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COBALT; METAL ION;

ADULT; BLOOD LEVEL; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; ION TRANSPORT; LOADING TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL IMPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; REVIEW; VOLUMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CHROMIUM; COBALT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;

EID: 79952801495     PISSN: 00305898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2011.01.006     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. De Smet K., De Haan R., Calistri C., et al. Metal ion measurement as a diagnostic tool to identify problems with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:202-208.
2. Hart A.J., Hester T., Sinclair K., et al. The association between metal ions from hip resurfacing and reduced T-cell counts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:449-454.
3. + T-cell lymphopenia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91(6):835-842.
4. Hart A.J., Sabah S., Henckel J., et al. The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91(6):738-744.
5. Counsell A., Heasley R., Arumilli B., et al. A groin mass caused by metal particle debris after hip resurfacing. Acta Orthop Belg 2008, 74(6):870-874.
6. Oldenburg M., Wegner R., Baur X. Severe cobalt intoxication due to prosthesis wear in repeated total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(5):825. e15-20.
7. Langton D.J., Jameson S.S., Joyce T.J., et al. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1143-1151.
8. Brodner W., Bitzan P., Meisinger V., et al. Serum cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85:2168-2173.
9. Vendittoli P.A., Mottard S., Roy A.G., et al. Chromium and cobalt ion release following the Durom high carbon content, forged metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:441-448.
10. Daniel J., Ziaee H., Pradhan C., et al. Six-year results of a prospective study of metal ion levels in young patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:176-179.
11. Khan M., Kuiper J.H., Richardson J.B. The exercise-related rise in plasma cobalt levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1152-1157.
12. De Haan R.D., Pattyn C., Gill H.S., et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1291-1297.
13. Rieker C.B., Schön R., Konrad R., et al. Influence of the clearance on in-vitro tribology of large diameter metal-on-metal articulations pertaining to resurfacing hip implants. Orthop Clin North Am 2005, 36(2):135-142.
14. Heisel C., Streich N., Krachler M., et al. Characterization of the running-in period in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an in vivo and in vitro metal ion analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):125-134.
15. Back D., Young D.A., Shimmin A.J. How do serum cobalt levels change after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing?. Clin Orthop 2005, 438:177-181.
16. Langton D.J., Sprowson A.P., Mahadeva D., et al. Cup anteversion post hip resurfacing arthroplasty: validation of EBRA and presentation of a simple clinical grading system. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25(4):607-613.
17. Langton D.J., Sprowson A.P., Joyce T.J., et al. Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:1287-1295.
18. Walter W.L., Insley G.M., Walter W.K., et al. Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:402-413.
19. Langton D.J., Joyce T.J., Jameson S.S., et al. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93(2):164-171.
20. De Haan R., Campbell P.A., Su E.P., et al. Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1158-1163.
21. Grammatopolous G., Pandit H., Kwon Y.M., et al. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:1019-1024.
22. Smith S.L., Dowson D., Goldsmith A.A. The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2001, 215:161-170.
23. Morlock M.M., Bishop N., Zustin J., et al. Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:89-95.
24. Tuke M.A., Scott G., Roques A., et al. Design considerations and life prediction of metal-on-metal bearings: the effect of clearance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:134-141.
25. Bowsher J.G., Nevelos J., Williams P.A., et al. Severe wear challenge to as-cast and double heat-treated large-diameter metal-on-metal hip bearings. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006, 220:135-143.
26. Leslie I., Williams S., Isaac G., et al. High cup angle and microseparation increase the wear of hip surface replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:2259-2265.
27. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip 1981, Heidelberg-New York, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
28. Ball S.T., Schmalzried T.P. Posterior femoroacetabular impingement (PFAI) after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 2009, 67(2):173-176.
29. Amstutz H., Lodwig R., Schurman D., et al. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements. A comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop 1975, 111:124.
30. Williams D., Royle M., Norton M. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(1):144-151.
31. Kluess D., Zietz C., Lindner T., et al. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter. Acta Orthop 2008, 79(6):748-754.
32. Murtha P.E., Hafez M.A., Jaramaz B., et al. Variations in acetabular anatomy with reference to total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:308-313.
33. Daniel J., Ziaee H., Kamali A., et al. Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92-B:20-27.
34. Joyce T.J., Langton D., Jameson S.S., et al. Tribological analysis of failed resurfacing hip prostheses and comparison with clinical data. Proc IME J J Eng Tribol 2009, 223:605-606.