High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the durom implant

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 469, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2598-2604

  Naal, Florian D ^a   Pilz, Ronny ^a   Munzinger, Urs ^a   Hersche, Otmar ^a   Leunig, Michael ^b  

^a SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; OXFORD HIP SCORE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; SURVIVOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; CONVALESCENCE; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SWITZERLAND; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SWITZERLAND; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053329552     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1792-3     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aldinger PR, Jung AW, Pritsch M, Breusch S, Thomsen M, Ewerbeck V, Parsch D. Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age: fifteen to twenty-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91: 1432-1439.
2. Amarasekera HW, Costa ML, Foguet P, Krikler SJ, Prakash U, Griffin DR. The blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction during resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparison of two approaches using Laser Doppler flowmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90: 442-445. (Pubitemid 351542859)
3. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:28-39. (Pubitemid 38057333)
4. Beaulé PE, Campbell P, Shim P. Femoral head blood flow during hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;456:148-152. (Pubitemid 46662411)
5. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:87-93. (Pubitemid 38140428)
6. Beaulé PE, Ganz R, Leunig M. [Blood flow to the femoral head and hip resurfacing arthroplasty][in German]. Orthopade. 2008;37: 659-666.
7. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629-1632.
8. Corten K, MacDonald SJ. Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:351-357.
9. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;121:20-32. (Pubitemid 8003188)
10. Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS, Murray DW. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1566-1574.
11. TM hip resurfacing: short- to midterm clinical and radiological outcome] [in German]. Orthopade. 2010;39:842-852.
12. Grammatopolous G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Gill HS. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1019-1024.
13. Gravius S, Mumme T, Weber O, Berdel P, Wirtz DC. [Surgical principles and clinical experiences with the DUROM hip resur-facing system using a lateral approach][in German]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009;21:586-601.
14. Gravius S, Wirtz D, Maus U, Andereya S, Müller-Rath R, Mumme T. [Durom hip resurfacing arthroplasty: first clinical experiences with a lateral approach][in German]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2007;145:461-467. (Pubitemid 47571632)
15. Heilpern GN, Shah NN, Fordyce MJ. Birmingham hip resurfac-ing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1137-1142.
16. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Shimmin AJ. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean offive years: an independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1431-1438. (Pubitemid 350273235)
17. Hing CB, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Bailey M, Back DL, Shimmin AJ. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1019-1024. (Pubitemid 47492794)
18. Jameson SS, Langton DJ, Natu S, Nargol TV. The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing: an indepen-dent center analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(6 suppl 1):50-55.
19. Joseph J, Mullen M, McAuley A, Pillai A. Femoral neck resorption following hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a radiological and biomechanical analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:1433-1438.
20. Khan A, Lovering AM, Bannister GC, Spencer RF, Kalap N. The effect of a modified posterior approach on blood flow to the femoral head during hip resurfacing. Hip Int. 2009;19:52-57.
21. Long WT, Dastane M, Harris MJ, Wan Z, Dorr LD. Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:400-405.
22. Mabilleau G, Kwon YM, Pandit H, Murray DW, Sabokbar A. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of peri-prosthetic biological reactions. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:734-747.
23. Mahendra G, Pandit H, Kliskey K, Murray D, Gill HS, Athanasou N. Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resur-facing hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:653-659.
24. McBryde CW, Revell MP, Thomas AM, Treacy RB, Pynsent PB. The influence of surgical approach on outcome in Birmingham hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:920-926.
25. McLaughlin JR, Lee KR. Total hip arthroplasty with an unce-mented tapered femoral component in patients younger than 50 years. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:9-15.
26. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329(suppl):S89-S98.
27. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:958-965.
28. Naal FD, Maffiuletti NA, Munzinger U, Hersche O. Sports after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:705-711. (Pubitemid 46956278)
29. Naal FD, SchmiedM,MunzingerU, Leunig M, Hersche O. Outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with developmental hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1516-1521.
30. Naal FD, Sieverding M, Impellizzeri FM, von Knoch F, Mannion AF, Leunig M. Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted German Oxford hip score. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:952-957.
31. Ollivere B, Darrah C, Barker T, Nolan J, Porteous MJ. Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1025-1030.
32. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:592-600.
33. Prosser GH, Yates PJ, Wood DJ, Graves SE, de Steiger RN, Miller LN. Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:66-71.
34. Shimmin AJ, Walter WL, Esposito C. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92: 469-476.
35. Spencer S, Carter R, Murray H, Meek RM. Femoral neck nar-rowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:1105-1109.
36. Springer BD, Connelly SE, Odum SM, Fehring TK, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Masonis JL. Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis oftotal hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6 suppl):2-8.
37. Steffen RT, Foguet PR, Krikler SJ, Gundle R, Beard DJ, Murray DW. Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:614-619.
38. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, Beard DJ, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW, Gill HS. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:436-441. (Pubitemid 351542858)
39. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resur-facing arthroplasty: aminimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:167-170.