Comparison of Fully Porous-Coated and Hybrid Hip Resurfacing: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Study

Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 231-239

  Gross, Thomas P ^a   Liu, Fei ^a  

^a Midlands Orthopaedics   (United States)

Author keywords

Bearing surface; Cemented; Hip arthroplasty; Hip resurfacing; Metal on metal; Uncemented

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; HYBRID HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POROUS COATED HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79952780849     PISSN: 00305898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.12.003     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Dunbar M.J. Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide. Orthopedics 2009, 32(9).
2. Mont M.A., Schmalzried T.P. Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):3-11.
3. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6 Suppl 1):36-43.
4. Schmalzried T.P. Why total hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(7 Suppl 3):57-60.
5. Daniel J., Pynsent P.B., McMinn D.J. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86(2):177-184.
6. Hing C.B., Back D.L., Bailey M., et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89(11):1431-1438.
7. Campbell P., Takamura K., Lundergan W., et al. Cement technique changes improved hip resurfacing longevity-implant retrieval findings. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009, 67(2):146-153.
8. Ong K.L., Manley M.T., Kurtz S.M. Have contemporary hip resurfacing designs reached maturity? A review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):81-88.
9. Stauffer R.N. Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982, 64(7):983-990.
10. Chandler H.P., Reineck F.T., Wixson R.L., et al. Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981, 63(9):1426-1434.
11. Jones L.C., Hungerford D.S. Cement disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987, 225(225):192-206.
12. Gross T.P., Liu F. Eight year clinic outcome of the metal-on-metal hybrid hip surface replacement 2010, AAOS, New Orleans (LA).
13. Lilikakis A.K., Vowler S.L., Villar R.N. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005, 36(2):215-222. ix.
14. Gross T.P., Liu F. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with an uncemented femoral component. A seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):32-37.
15. Gross T.P., Liu F. Minimally invasive posterior approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 2010, 25(1):39-49.
16. Brooker A.F., Bowerman J.W., Robinson R.A., et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973, 55(8):1629-1632.
17. Back D.L., Dalziel R., Young D., et al. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87(3):324-329.
18. Amstutz H.C., Beaule P.E., Dorey F.J., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86(1):28-39.
19. Mont M.A., Marker D.R., Smith J.M., et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467(1):66-71.
20. Shimmin A., Beaule P.E., Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(3):637-654.
21. Hedley A.K., Clarke I.C., Kozinn S.C., et al. Porous ingrowth fixation of the femoral component in a canine surface replacement of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982, 163:300-311.
22. Amstutz H.C., Kabo M., Hermens K., et al. Porous surface replacement of the hip with chamfer cylinder design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987, 222:140-160.
23. Ramakrishnan R., Jaffe W.L., Kennedy W.R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing radiographic evaluation techniques. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(8):1099-1104.
24. Sund G., Rosenquist J. Morphological changes in bone following intramedullary implantation of methyl methacrylate. Effects of medullary occlusion: a morphometrical study. Acta Orthop Scand 1983, 54(2):148-156.
25. Galin M.A., Chowchuvech E., Galin A. Tissue culture methods for testing the toxicity of ocular plastic materials. Am J Ophthalmol 1975, 79(4):665-669.
26. Linder L. Tissue reaction to methyl methacrylate monomer. A comparative study in the rabbit's ear on the toxicity of methyl methacrylate monomer of varying composition. Acta Orthop Scand 1976, 47(1):3-10.
27. Fries I.B., Fisher A.A., Salvati E.A. Contact dermatitis in surgeons from methylmethacrylate bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975, 57(4):547-549.
28. Jasty M.J., Floyd W.E., Schiller A.L., et al. Localized osteolysis in stable, non-septic total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986, 68(6):912-919.
29. Willert H.G., Ludwig J., Semlitsch M. Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty: a long-term gross, light microscopic, and scanning electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974, 56(7):1368-1382.
30. Chwirut D.J. Long-term compressive creep deformation and damage in acrylic bone cements. J Biomed Mater Res 1984, 18(1):25-37.
31. Aspenberg P., Herbertsson P. Periprosthetic bone resorption. Particles versus movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996, 78(4):641-646.
32. Mann K.A., Bartel D.L., Wright T.M., et al. Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface. J Orthop Res 1991, 9(6):798-808.
33. Janssen D., Mann K.A., Verdonschot N. Finite element simulation of cement-bone interface micromechanics: a comparison to experimental results. J Orthop Res 2009, 27(10):1312-1318.
34. Maloney W.J., Schmalzried T., Harris W.H. Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 405:70-78.
35. Grubl A., Chiari C., Gruber M., et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup: a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84(3):425-431.
36. McLaughlin J.R., Lee K.R. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(6):1290-1296.
37. McAuley J.P., Szuszczewicz E.S., Young A., et al. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 418(418):119-125.
38. Epinette J.A., Manley M.T., D'Antonio J.A., et al. A 10-year minimum follow-up of hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups: clinical, radiographic and survivorship analyses with comparison to the literature. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18(2):140-148.
39. Huo M.H., Parvizi J., Bal B.S., et al. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(9):2043-2055.
40. Hooper G.J., Rothwell A.G., Stringer M., et al. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91(4):451-458.
41. McMinn D.J., Daniel J., Ziaee H., et al. Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: a six- to 9.6-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(6):715-723.
42. De Haan R., Campbell P.A., Su E.P., et al. Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(9):1158-1163.
43. Katrana P., Crawford J.R., Lilikakis A., et al. Femoral neck resorption after hip resurfacing arthroplasty-a comparison of cemented and uncemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88(Supp II):234.