The outcomes of cormet™ hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 69, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Costa, Christopher R ^a   Johnson, Aaron J ^a   Naziri, Qais ^a   Mont, Michael A ^a  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE DECOMPRESSION; NERVE PARALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RATING SCALE; REOPERATION; SCIATIC NERVE; SCIATIC NERVE PARALYSIS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960462686     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Nunley RM, Della Valle CJ, Barrack RL. Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(1):56-65.
2. Kim PR, Beaulé PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Sept;23(6 Suppl 1):44-9.
3. Fowble VA, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty-patients and outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67:108-12.
4. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):737-55.
5. Lingard EA, Muthumayandi K, Holland JP. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1550-4.
6. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(1):66-71.
7. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:63-70.
8. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(5):592-600.
9. Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:123-31.
10. Zywiel MG, Marker DR, McGrath MS, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67:116-9.