The Role of Local Backrub Motions in Evolved and Designed Mutations

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Keedy, Daniel A ^a,c   Georgiev, Ivelin ^b   Triplett, Edward B ^a   Donald, Bruce R ^a,b   Richardson, David C ^a   Richardson, Jane S ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL ATOMIC STRUCTURE; PEPTIDES;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; DI-PEPTIDES; HIGH RESOLUTION CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; LOWER ENERGIES; PROTEIN DESIGN; PROTEINS STRUCTURES; ROTAMERS; SIDE-CHAINS; TWO-STATE; VERY HIGH RESOLUTION;

AMINO ACIDS;

ALGORITHM; ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; BACKRUB MOTION; BETA SHEET; COMPUTER MODEL; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION; POINT MUTATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN MOTIF;

EID: 84866060981     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002629     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Chen CY, Georgiev I, Anderson AC, Donald BR, (2009) Computational structure-based redesign of enzyme activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 3764-3769.
2. Siegel JB, Zanghellini A, Lovick HM, Kiss G, Lambert AR, et al. (2010) Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels-Alder reaction. Science 329: 309-313.
3. Frey KM, Georgiev I, Donald BR, Anderson AC, (2010) Predicting resistance mutations using protein design algorithms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 13707-13712.
4. Fleishman SJ, Whitehead TA, Ekiert DC, Dreyfus C, Corn JE, et al. (2011) Computational design of proteins targeting the conserved stem region of influenza hemagglutinin. Science 332: 816-821.
5. Fadel AR, Jin DQ, Montelione GT, Levy RM, (1995) Crankshaft motions of the polypeptide backbone in molecular dynamics simulations of human type-alpha transforming growth factor. J Biomol NMR 6: 221-226.
6. Harbury PB, Plecs JJ, Tidor B, Alber T, Kim PS, (1998) High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. Science 282: 1462-1467.
7. Fu X, Apgar JR, Keating AE, (2007) Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel alpha-helical ligands for Bcl-xL. J Mol Biol 371: 1099-1117.
8. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, et al. (2003) Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302: 1364-1368.
9. Davis IW, Arendall WB 3rd, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, (2006) The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. Structure 14: 265-274.
10. Georgiev I, Keedy D, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, Donald BR, (2008) Algorithm for backrub motions in protein design. Bioinformatics 24: i196-204.
11. Donald BR, (2011) Algorithms in Structural Molecular Biology MIT Press. pp. 464.
12. Humphris EL, Kortemme T, (2008) Prediction of protein-protein interface sequence diversity using flexible backbone computational protein design. Structure 16: 1777-1788.
13. Friedland GD, Linares AJ, Smith CA, Kortemme T, (2008) A simple model of backbone flexibility improves modeling of side-chain conformational variability. J Mol Biol 380: 757-774.
14. Smith CA, Kortemme T, (2008) Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 380: 742-756.
15. Friedland GD, Lakomek NA, Griesinger C, Meiler J, Kortemme T, (2009) A correspondence between solution-state dynamics of an individual protein and the sequence and conformational diversity of its family. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000393.
16. Smith CA, Kortemme T, (2011) Predicting the tolerated sequences for proteins and protein interfaces using RosettaBackrub flexible backbone design. PLoS One 6: e20451.
17. Richardson JS, Richardson DC, (1988) Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. Science 240: 1648-1652.
18. Presta LG, Rose GD, (1988) Helix signals in proteins. Science 240: 1632-1641.
19. Serrano L, Fersht AR, (1989) Capping and alpha-helix stability. Nature 342: 296-299.
20. Kapp GT, Richardson JS, Oas TG, (2004) Kinetic role of helix caps in protein folding is context-dependent. Biochemistry 43: 3814-3823.
21. Kleywegt GJ, (1999) Experimental assessment of differences between related protein crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 55: 1878-1884.
22. Mowbray SL, Helgstrand C, Sigrell JA, Cameron AD, Jones TA, (1999) Errors and reproducibility in electron-density map interpretation. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 55: 1309-1319.
23. Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall WB 3rd, de Bakker PI, Word JM, et al. (2003) Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation. Proteins 50: 437-450.
24. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, et al. (1995) A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117: 5179-5197.
25. Lazaridis T, Karplus M, (1999) Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 35: 133-152.
26. Gainza P, Roberts KE, Georgiev I, Lilien RH, Keedy DA, et al. (2012) OSPREY: Protein Design with Ensembles, Flexibility, and Provable Algorithms. Methods in Enzymology In press.
27. Karplus PA, (1996) Experimentally observed conformation-dependent geometry and hidden strain in proteins. Protein Sci 5: 1406-1420.
28. Berkholz DS, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL Jr, Karplus PA, (2009) Conformation dependence of backbone geometry in proteins. Structure 17: 1316-1325.
29. Richardson JS, Richardson DC, Tweedy NB, Gernert KM, Quinn TP, et al. (1992) Looking at proteins: representations, folding, packing, and design. Biophysical Society National Lecture, 1992. Biophys J 63: 1185-1209.
30. Merkel JS, Regan L, (1998) Aromatic rescue of glycine in beta sheets. Fold Des 3: 449-455.
31. Frauenfelder H, Sligar SG, Wolynes PG, (1991) The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 254: 1598-1603.
32. Tokuriki N, Tawfik DS, (2009) Protein dynamism and evolvability. Science 324: 203-207.
33. Ortlund EA, Bridgham JT, Redinbo MR, Thornton JW, (2007) Crystal structure of an ancient protein: evolution by conformational epistasis. Science 317: 1544-1548.
34. Levinthal C, (1969) How to Fold Graciously. Mossbauer Spectroscopy in Biological Systems: Proceedings of a meeting held at Allerton House, Monticello, Illinois pp. 22-24.
35. Pierce NA, Winfree E, (2002) Protein design is NP-hard. Protein Eng 15: 779-782.
36. Berman HM, Bhat TN, Bourne PE, Feng Z, Gilliland G, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank and the challenge of structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 7 Suppl: 957-959.
37. Chen VB, Arendall WB 3rd, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, et al. (2010) MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 12-21.
38. Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, (1999) Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol 285: 1735-1747.
39. Chen VB, Davis IW, Richardson DC, (2009) KING (Kinemage, Next Generation): a versatile interactive molecular and scientific visualization program. Protein Sci 18: 2403-2409.
40. Bell JA, Becktel WJ, Sauer U, Baase WA, Matthews BW, (1992) Dissection of helix capping in T4 lysozyme by structural and thermodynamic analysis of six amino acid substitutions at Thr 59. Biochemistry 31: 3590-3596.
41. Kabsch W, Sander C, (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
42. Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, (1999) Asparagine and glutamine rotamers: B-factor cutoff and correction of amide flips yield distinct clustering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 400-405.
43. Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, (2000) The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 40: 389-408.
44. Word JM, Lovell SC, LaBean TH, Taylor HC, Zalis ME, et al. (1999) Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms. J Mol Biol 285: 1711-1733.