Molecular live cell bioimaging in stem cell research

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1266, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 18-27

  Endele, Max ^a   Schroeder, Timm ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biosensors; Cytokines; Imaging; Lineage choice; M CSF; Signaling; Stem cell; Time lapse

Indexed keywords

COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR 1; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN KINASE C; PROTEIN SH2;

ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; BONE MARROW; CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CYTOKINE RELEASE; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; HUMAN; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NONHUMAN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEM CELL; TRANSLOCATION LINE;

EID: 84865352787     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06560.x     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Orkin, S.H. & L.I. Zon 2008. Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell 132: 631-644.
2. Wilson, A. et al 2008. Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell 135: 1118-1129.
3. Lo Celso, C. & D.T. Scadden 2011. The haematopoietic stem cell niche at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 124: 3529-3535.
4. Ji, H. et al 2010. Comprehensive methylome map of lineage commitment from haematopoietic progenitors. Nature 467: 338-342.
5. Zhu, J. & S.G. Emerson 2002. Hematopoietic cytokines, transcription factors and lineage commitment. Oncogene 21: 3295-3313.
6. Zhang, C.C. & F. Harvey 2008. Cytokines regulating hematopoietic stem cell function. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 15: 307-311.
7. Zon, L.I. 2008. Intrinsic and extrinsic control of haematopoietic stem-cell self-renewal. Nature 453: 306-313.
8. Metcalf, D. 2008. Hematopoietic cytokines. Blood 111: 485-491.
9. Enver, T. et al 1998. Do stem cells play dice? Blood 92: 348-352.
10. Cross, M.A. & T. Enver 1997. The lineage commitment of haemopoietic progenitor cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Develop. 7: 609-613.
11. Rieger, M.A. et al 2009. Hematopoietic cytokines can instruct lineage choice. Science 325: 217-218.
12. Sarrazin, S. et al 2009. MafB restricts M-CSF-dependent myeloid commitment divisions of hematopoietic stem cells. Cell 138: 300-313.
13. Spangrude, G.J. et al 1988. Purification and characterization of mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Science 241: 58-62.
14. Osawa, M. et al 1996. Long-term lymphohematopoietic reconstitution by a single CD34-low/negative hematopoietic stem cell. Science 273: 242-245.
15. Kiel, M.J. et al 2005. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 121: 1109-1121.
16. Benveniste, P. et al 2010. Intermediate-term hematopoietic stem cells with extended but time-limited reconstitution potential. Cell Stem Cell 6: 48-58.
17. Kent, D.G. et al 2009. Prospective isolation and molecular characterization of hematopoietic stem cells with durable self-renewal potential. Blood 113: 6342-6350.
18. Akashi, K. et al 2000. A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages. Nature 404: 193-197.
19. Doulatov, S. et al 2010. Revised map of the human progenitor hierarchy shows the origin of macrophages and dendritic cells in early lymphoid development. Nature Immunol. 11: 585-593.
20. Notta, F. et al 2011. Isolation of single human hematopoietic stem cells capable of long-term multilineage engraftment. Science 333: 218-221.
21. Dykstra, B. et al 2007. Long-term propagation of distinct hematopoietic differentiation programs in vivo. Cell Stem Cell 1: 218-229.
22. Müller-Sieburg, C.E. et al 2002. Deterministic regulation of hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Blood 100: 1302-1309.
23. Morita, Y. et al 2010. Heterogeneity and hierarchy within the most primitive hematopoietic stem cell compartment. J. Exp. Med. 207: 1173-1182.
24. Challen, G.A. et al 2010. Distinct hematopoietic stem cell subtypes are differentially regulated by TGF-beta1. Cell Stem Cell 6: 265-278.
25. Schroeder, T. 2010. Hematopoietic stem cell heterogeneity: subtypes, not unpredictable behavior. Cell Stem Cell 6: 203-207.
26. Balaban, N.Q. et al 2004. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305: 1622-1625.
27. Sprinzak, D. et al 2010. Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states. Nature 465: 86-90.
28. Ashall, L. et al 2009. Pulsatile stimulation determines timing and specificity of NF-kappaB-dependent transcription. Science 324: 242-246.
29. Marshall, C.J. 1995. Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell 80: 179-185.
30. Schroeder, T. 2008. Imaging stem-cell-driven regeneration in mammals. Nature 453: 345-351.
31. Schroeder, T. 2011. Long-term single-cell imaging of mammalian stem cells. Nature Methods 8: S30-S35.
32. Schroeder, T. 2005. Tracking hematopoiesis at the single cell level. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1044: 201-209.
33. Eilken, H.M. et al 2009. Continuous single-cell imaging of blood generation from haemogenic endothelium. Nature 457: 896-900.
34. Kuang, S. et al 2007. Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 129: 999-1010.
35. Cohen, A.R. et al 2010. Computational prediction of neural progenitor cell fates. Nature Methods 7: 213-218.
36. Scherf, N. et al 2012. On the symmetry of siblings: automated single-cell tracking to quantify the behavior of hematopoietic stem cells in a biomimetic setup. Exp. Hematol. 40:119-130.
37. Dykstra, B. et al 2006. High-resolution video monitoring of hematopoietic stem cells cultured in single-cell arrays identifies new features of self-renewal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 8185-8190.
38. Kimura, A. et al 2009. The transcription factors STAT5A/B regulate GM-CSF-mediated granulopoiesis. Blood 114: 4721-4728.
39. Lecault, V. et al 2011. High-throughput analysis of single hematopoietic stem cell proliferation in microfluidic cell culture arrays. Nature Methods 8: 581-586.
40. Rieger, M.A. & T. Schroeder 2009. Analyzing cell fate control by cytokines through continuous single cell biochemistry. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 343-352.
41. Pixley, F.J. & E.R. Stanley 2004. CSF-1 regulation of the wandering macrophage: complexity in action. Trends Cell Biol. 14: 628-638.
42. Metcalf, D. 1998. Lineage commitment and maturation in hematopoietic cells: the case for extrinsic regulation. Blood 92: 345-347.
43. Bourette, R.P. & L.R. Rohrschneider 2000. Early events in M-CSF receptor signaling. Growth Factors 17: 155-166.
44. Yu, W. et al 2008. CSF-1 receptor structure/function in MacCsf1r-/- macrophages: regulation of proliferation, differentiation, and morphology. J. Leukocyte Biol. 84: 852-863.
45. Bourette, R.P. et al 2001. Suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 interacts with the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor and negatively regulates its proliferation signal. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 22133-22139.
46. Bourette, R.P. et al 1997. Sequential activation of phoshatidylinositol 3-kinase and phospholipase C-gamma2 by the M-CSF receptor is necessary for differentiation signaling. EMBO J. 16: 5880-5893.
47. Bourette, R. et al 1995. Uncoupling of the proliferation and differentiation signals mediated by the murine macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor expressed in myeloid FDC-P1 cells. Cell Growth Differentiation 6: 631-645.
48. Bourgin, C. et al 2002. Induced expression and association of the Mona/Gads adapter and Gab3 scaffolding protein during monocyte/macrophage differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 3744-3756.
49. Liu, Y. et al 2001. Scaffolding protein Gab2 mediates differentiation signaling downstream of Fms receptor tyrosine kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 3047-3056.
50. Mancini, A. et al 1997. Identification of a second Grb2 binding site in the v-Fms tyrosine kinase. Oncogene 15: 1565-1572.
51. Wilhelmsen, K. et al 2002. C-Cbl binds the CSF-1 receptor at tyrosine 973, a novel phosphorylation site in the receptor's carboxy-terminus. Oncogene 21: 1079-1089.
52. Wolf, I. et al 2002. Gab3, an new DOS /Gab family member, facilitates macrophage differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 231-244.
53. Geer, P.V.D. & T. Hunter 1991. Tyrosine 706 and 807 phosphorylation site mutants in the murine colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor are unaffected in their ability to bind or phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase but show differential defects in their ability to induce early response gene transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 4698-4709.
54. Takeshita, S. et al 2007. c-Fms tyrosine 559 is a major mediator of M-CSF-induced proliferation of primary macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 18980-18990.
55. Faccio, R. et al 2007. M-CSF regulates the cytoskeleton via recruitment of a multimeric signaling complex to c-Fms Tyr-559/697/721. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 18991-18999.
56. Hamilton, J.A. 1997. CSF-1 signal transduction. J. Leukocyte Biol. 62: 145-155.
57. Marks, D.C. et al 1999. Expression of a Y559F mutant CSF-1 receptor in M1 myeloid cells: a role for Src kinases in CSF-1 receptor-mediated differentiation. Mol. Cell Biol. Res. Commun. 1: 144-152.
58. Rohde, C.M. et al 2004. A juxtamembrane tyrosine in the colony stimulating factor-1 receptor regulates ligand-induced Src association, receptor kinase function, and down-regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 43448-43461.
59. Sampaio, N.G. et al 2011. Phosphorylation of CSF-1R Y721 mediates its association with PI3K to regulate macrophage motility and enhancement of tumor cell invasion. J. Cell Sci. 124: 2021-2031.
60. Imamura, K. et al 1990. Colony-stimulating factor 1 activates protein kinase C in human monocytes. EMBO J. 9: 2423-2429.
61. Jaworowski, A. et al 1994. Phospholipase D is activated by phorbol ester but not CSF-1 in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 201: 733-739.
62. Heyworth, C.M. et al 1994. Cytokine-mediated protein kinase C activation is a signal for lineage determination in bipotential granulocyte macrophage colony-forming cells. J. Cell Biol. 125: 651-659.
63. Pierce, A. et al 1998. An activated protein kinase C alpha gives a differentiation signal for hematopoietic progenitor cells and mimicks macrophage colony-stimulating factor-stimulated signaling events. J. Cell Biol. 140: 1511-1518.
64. Junttila, I. et al 2003. M-CSF induced differentiation of myeloid precursor cells involves activation of PKC-δ and expression of Pkare. J. Leukocyte Biol. 73: 281-288.
65. Xu, X. et al 1993. Phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis and c-myc expression are in collaborating mitogenic pathways activated by colony-stimulating factor 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 1522-1533.
66. Rossi, F. et al 1996. Lineage commitment of transformed haematopoietic progenitors is determined by the level of PKC activity. EMBO J. 15: 1894-1901.
67. Nakakuki, T. et al 2010. Ligand-specific c-Fos expression emerges from the spatiotemporal control of ErbB network dynamics. Cell 141: 884-896.
68. von Kriegsheim, A. et al 2009. Cell fate decisions are specified by the dynamic ERK interactome. Nature Cell Biol. 11: 1458-1464.
69. Rocks, O. et al 2005. An acylation cycle regulates localization and activity of palmitoylated Ras isoforms. Science 307: 1746-1752.
70. Nelson, D.E. et al 2004. Oscillations in NF-kappaB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. Science 306: 704-708.
71. Shimojo, H. et al 2008. Oscillations in notch signaling regulate maintenance of neural progenitors. Neuron 58: 52-64.
72. Oancea, E. et al 1998. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged cysteine-rich domains from protein kinase C as fluorescent indicators for diacylglycerol signaling in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 140: 485-498.
73. Reither, G. et al 2006. PKCalpha: a versatile key for decoding the cellular calcium toolkit. J. Cell Biol. 174: 521-533.
74. Oancea, E. & T. Meyer 1998. Protein kinase C as a molecular machine for decoding calcium and diacylglycerol signals. Cell 95: 307-318.
75. Nishio, M. et al 2007. Control of cell polarity and motility by the PtdIns(3, 4, 5)P3 phosphatase SHIP1. Nature Cell Biol. 9: 36-44.
76. Várnai, P. & T. Balla 2008. Live cell imaging of phosphoinositides with expressed inositide binding protein domains. Methods 46: 167-176.
77. Haugh, J.M. et al 2000. Spatial sensing in fibroblasts mediated by 3′ phosphoinositides. J. Cell Biol. 151: 1269-1280.
78. Stauffer, T.P. et al 1998. Receptor-induced transient reduction in plasma membrane PtdIns(4, 5)P2 concentration monitored in living cells. Curr. Biol. 8: 343-346.
79. Tay, S. et al 2010. Single-cell NF-kappaB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing. Nature 466: 267-271.
80. Schleifenbaum, A. et al 2004. Genetically encoded FRET probe for PKC activity based on pleckstrin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126: 11786-11787.
81. Brumbaugh, J. et al 2006. A dual parameter FRET probe for measuring PKC and PKA activity in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128: 24-25.
82. Violin, J.D. et al 2003. A genetically encoded fluorescent reporter reveals oscillatory phosphorylation by protein kinase C. J. Cell Biol. 161: 899-909.
83. Fujioka, A. et al 2006. Dynamics of the Ras/ERK MAPK cascade as monitored by fluorescent probes. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 8917-8926.
84. Yoshizaki, H. et al 2003. Activity of Rho-family GTPases during cell division as visualized with FRET-based probes. J. Cell Biol. 162: 223-232.
85. Kajimoto, T. et al 2010. Protein kinase C δ-specific activity reporter reveals agonist-evoked nuclear activity controlled by Src family of kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 285: 41896-41910.
86. Yoshizaki, H. et al 2007. Akt-PDK1 complex mediates epidermal growth factor-induced membrane protrusion through Ral activation. Mol. Biol. Cell 18: 119-128.
87. Fosbrink, M. et al 2010. Visualization of JNK activity dynamics with a genetically encoded fluorescent biosensor. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 5459-5464.
88. Itoh, R.E. et al 2002. Activation of Rac and Cdc42 video imaged by fluorescent resonance energy transfer-based single-molecule probes in the membrane of living cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 6582-6591.
89. Gallegos, L.L. et al 2006. Targeting protein kinase C activity reporter to discrete intracellular regions reveals spatiotemporal differences in agonist-dependent signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 30947-30956.
90. Megason, S.G. & S.E. Fraser 2007. Imaging in systems biology. Cell 130: 784-795.
91. Palmer, A.E. et al 2006. Ca2+ indicators based on computationally redesigned calmodulin-peptide pairs. Chem. Biol. 13: 521-530.
92. Shaner, N.C. et al 2008. Improving the photostability of bright monomeric orange and red fluorescent proteins. Nature Methods 5: 545-551.
93. van der Krogt, G.N.M. et al 2008. A comparison of donor-acceptor pairs for genetically encoded FRET sensors: application to the Epac cAMP sensor as an example. PloS One 3: e1916.
94. Grant, D.M. et al 2008. Multiplexed FRET to image multiple signaling events in live cells. Biophys. J. 95: L69-L71.
95. Merzlyak, E.M. et al 2007. Bright monomeric red fluorescent protein with an extended fluorescence lifetime. Nature Methods 4: 555-557.
96. Shcherbo, D. et al 2009. Practical and reliable FRET/FLIM pair of fluorescent proteins. BMC Biotechnology 9: 24-30.
97. Ai, H. et al 2008. Fluorescent protein FRET pairs for ratiometric imaging of dual biosensors. Nature Methods 5: 401-403.
98. Piljic, A. & C. Schultz 2008. Simultaneous recording of multiple cellular events by FRET. ACS Chem. Biol. 3: 156-160.
99. Shcherbo, D. et al 2010. Near-infrared fluorescent proteins. Nature Methods 7: 827-829.
100. Shu, X. et al 2009. Mammalian expression of infrared fluorescent proteins engineered from a bacterial phytochrome. Science 324: 804-807.