Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs)

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1376-1396

  Tauber, Sarah K ^a   Rhodes, Matthew G ^b  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Forgetting; Judgements of retention; Metacognition; Metamemory; Monitoring; Retention; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL; STATISTICS; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864697008     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.656665     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J. and Bailey, H. 2009. Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138: 432-447. doi:10.1037/a0015928
2. Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R. and Sanvito, J. 1989. Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28: 610-632.
3. Benjamin, A. S. and Diaz, M. 2008. "Measurement of relative metamnemonic accuracy". In Handbook of metamemory and memory, Edited by: Dunlosky, J. and Bjork, R. A. 73-94. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4. Carroll, M., Nelson, T. O. and Kirwan, A. 1997. Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: Differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention. Acta Psychologica, 95: 239-253. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(96)00040-6
5. Daniels, K. A., Toth, J. P. and Hertzog, C. 2009. Aging and recollection in the accuracy of judgments of learning. Psychology and Aging, 24: 494-500. doi:10.1037/a0015269
6. Dunlosky, J. and Metcalfe, J. 2009. Metacognition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Dunlosky, J., Serra, M. J., Matvey, G. and Rawson, K. A. 2005. Second-order judgments about judgments of learning. Journal of General Psychology, 132: 335-346. doi:10.3200/GENP.132.4.335-346
8. Dunlosky, J. and Thiede, K. W. 2004. Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32: 779-788.
9. Finn, B. 2008. Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control. Memory & Cognition, 36: 813-821. doi:10.3758/MC.36.4813
10. Friedman, M. C. and Castel, A. D. in press. Are we aware of our ability to forget? Metacognitive predictions of directed forgetting. Memory & Cognition, Advanced online publication. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0115-y
11. Halamish, V., McGillivray, S. and Castel, A. D. 2011. Monitoring one's own forgetting in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26, 631-635. doi:10.1037/a0022852
12. Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, A. E. and Kidder, D. P. 2003. Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 29: 22-34. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.22
13. Kelemen, W. L. 2000. Metamemory cues and monitoring accuracy: Judging what you know and what you will know. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92: 800-810. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.800
14. Koriat, A. 1997. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126: 349-370. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
15. Koriat, A. 2007. "Metacognition and consciousness". In The Cambridge handbook of consciousness, Edited by: Zelazo, P. D., Moscovitch, M. and Thompson, E. 289-325. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. Koriat, A. and Bjork, R. A. 2005. Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 31: 187-194. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.187
17. Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L. and Bar, S. K. 2004. Predicting one's own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133: 643-656. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.643
18. Koriat, A. and Ma'ayan, H. 2005. The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52: 478-492. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.001
19. Koriat, A., Sheffer, L. and Ma'ayan, H. 2002. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131: 147-162. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.2.147
20. Kornell, N. and Bjork, R. A. 2009. A stability bias in human memory: Overestimating remembering and underestimating learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138: 449-468. doi:10.1037/a0017350
21. Kornell, N., Rhodes, M. G., Castel, A. D. and Tauber, S. K. 2011. The ease of processing heuristic and the stability bias: Dissociating memory, memory beliefs, and memory judgments. Psychological Science, 22: 787-794.
22. Kucera, H. and Francis, W. N. 1967. Computational analysis of present-day American English, Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
23. Masson, M. E. and Rotello, C. M. 2009. Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: Implications for studies of metacognition processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 35: 509-527. doi:10.1037/a0014876
24. McCabe, D. P. and Soderstrom, N. C. 2011. Recollection-based metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: Judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKs). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0024014
25. McGillivray, S. and Castel, A. D. 2011. Betting on memory leads to metacognitive improvement by younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26: 137-142. doi:10.1037/a0022681
26. Metcalfe, J. 2000. "Metamemory: Theory and data". In The Oxford handbook on memory, Edited by: Tulving, E. and Craik, F. I. M. 197-211. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Metcalfe, J. and Finn, B. 2008. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15: 174-179. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.174
28. Metcalfe, J. and Kornell, N. 2005. A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52: 463-477. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.001
29. Miller, T. M. and Geraci, L. 2011. Unskilled but aware: Reinterpreting overconfidence in low-performing students. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 37: 502-506. doi:10.1037/a0021802
30. Nelson, T. O. 1984. A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95: 109-133. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109
31. Nelson, T. O. and Dunlosky, J. 1991. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect". Psychological Science, 2: 267-270. doi:10.111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00147.x
32. Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A. and Narens, L. 1994. Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5: 207-213. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x
33. Nelson, T. O. and Narens, L. 1994. "Why investigate metacognition?". In Metacognition: Knowing about knowing, Edited by: Metcalfe, J. and Shimamura, A. P. 1-25. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34. Paivio, A. 1966. Latency of verbal associates and imagery to noun stimuli as a function of abstractness and generality. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 20: 378-387. doi:10.1037/h0082953
35. Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J. and McDonald, S. L. 2002. Influences of metamemory on performance predictions for text. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A: 505-524. doi:10.1080/02724980143000352
36. Rhodes, M. G. and Castel, A. D. 2008. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137: 615-625. doi:10.1037/a0013684
37. Rhodes, M. G. and Castel, A. D. 2009. Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: Effects on monitoring and control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, doi:10.3758/PBR.16.3.550
38. Rhodes, M. G. and Tauber, S. K. 2011. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137: 131-148. doi:10.1037/a0021705
39. Shaddock, A. and Carroll, M. 1997. Influences on metamemory judgements. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49: 21-27. doi:10.1080/00049539708259846
40. Tauber, S. K. and Rhodes, M. G. 2010a. Does the amount of material to-be-remembered influence JOLs?. Memory, 18: 351-362. doi:10.1080/09658211003662755
41. Tauber, S. K. and Rhodes, M. G. 2010b. Metacognitive errors contribute to the difficulty in proper name learning. Memory, 18: 522-532. doi:10.1080/09658211.2010.481818
42. Tauber, S. K. and Rhodes, M. G. 2011. Multiple bases for young and older adults' judgments of learning in multitrial learning. Psychology and Aging, Advanced online publication. doi:10.1037/a0025246
43. Thiede, K. W. and Dunlosky, J. 1999. Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 25: 1024-1037. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1024
44. Tiede, H. L. and Leboe, J. P. 2009. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: Improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 35: 822-828. doi:10.1037/a0015122
45. Townsend, C. L. and Heit, E. 2011. Judgments of learning and improvement. Memory & Cognition, 39: 204-216. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0019-2