Second-order judgments about judgments of learning

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 335-346

  Dunlosky, John ^a   Serra, Michael J ^a   Matvey, Greg ^a   Rawson, Katherine A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Judgments of learning; Metacognition; Metamemory; Second order judgments

Indexed keywords

EID: 27644556959     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/GENP.132.4.335-346     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., &Sanvito, J.(1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 610-632.
2. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., &Schwartz, B. L.(1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
3. Connor, L. T., Dunlosky, J., &Hertzog, C.(1997). Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy. Psychology and Aging, 12, 50-71.
4. Dunlosky, J., &Nelson, T. O.(1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur?Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545-565.
5. Kelemen, W. L., &Weaver, C. A., III. (1997). Enhanced metamemory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1394-1409.
6. Keren, G.(1991). Calibration and probability judgments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica, 77, 217-273.
7. Koriat, A.(1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
8. Koriat, A., &Levy-Sadot, R.(2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 34-53.
9. Maki, R. H.(1998). Test predictions over text material. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 117-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Mazzoni, G., &Nelson, T. O.(1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1263-1274.
11. Nelson, T. O.(1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-ofknowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
12. Nelson, T. O., &Dunlosky, J.(1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect." Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
13. Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L.(1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125-173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., &Dunlosky, J.(2004). A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods, 9, 53-69.
15. Schwartz, B. L.(1994). Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 357-375.
16. Thiede, K. W.(1999). The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 662-667.
17. Vernon, D., &Usher, M.(2003). Dynamics of metacognitive judgments: Pre- and postretrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 339-346.
18. Wallsten, T. S.(1996). An analysis of judgment research analyses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 220-226.
19. Weaver, C. A., III, &Kelemen, W. L.(1997). Judgments of learning at delays: Shifts in response patterns or increased metamemory accuracy?Psychological Science, 8, 318-321.