Does the amount of material to be remembered influence judgements of learning (JOLs)?

Memory

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 351-362

  Tauber, Sarah K ^a   Rhodes, MatthewG ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

List length; Memory; Metacognition; Metamemory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951686237     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658211003662755     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arbuckle, T. Y., & Cuddy, L. L. (1969). Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 126-131.
2. Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., & Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 610-632.
3. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
4. Castel, A. D., McCabe, D. P., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: Evidence from judgements of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 107-111.
5. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgements of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545-565.
6. Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Retention as a function of the order of succession of the members of the series. In H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius (Trans.), Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (pp. 90-123). New York: Teacher's College Press.
7. Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208-216.
8. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
9. Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289-325). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 187-194.
11. Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. K. (2004). Predicting one's own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 643-656.
12. Maki, R. H. (1999). The roles of competition, target accessibility, and cue familiarity in metamemory for word pairs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1011-1023.
13. Mazzoni, G., & Nelson, T. O. (1995). Judgements of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1263-1274.
14. Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metamemory: Theory and data. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on memory (pp. 197-211). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 851-861.
16. Moulin, C. J. A., Perfect, T. J., & Jones, R. W. (2000). Evidence for intact monitoring in Alzheimer's disease: Metamemory sensitivity at encoding. Neuropsychologica, 38, 1242-1250.
17. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
18. MRC Psycholinguistic Database. (1987). Kucera-Francis Word Frequency. Available from MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine Usable Dictionary, Version 2.0 from http://www.psy.uwa.edu.au/mrcdatabase/mrc2.html
19. Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008a). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experiment Psychology: General, 137, 615-625.
20. Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008b). Metacognition and part-set cuing: Can interference be predicted at retrieval? Memory & Cognition, 36, 1429-1438.
21. Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2009). Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: Effects on monitoring and control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 550-554.
22. Roediger, H. L. III, Stellon, C. C., & Tulving, E. (1977). Inhibition from part-list cues and rate of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 174-188.
23. Slamecka, N. J. (1968). An examination of trace storage in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 504-513.
24. Strong, E. K. (1912). The effect of length of series upon recognition memory. Psychological Review, 19, 447-462.