Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 813-821

  Finn, Bridgid ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

COGNITION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 46449098155     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.4.813     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ATKINSON, R. C. (1972a). Ingredients for a theory of instruction. American Psychologist, 27, 921-931.
2. ATKINSON, R. C. (1972b). Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96, 124-129.
3. BEGG, I., DUFT, S., LALONDE, P., MELNICK, R., & SANVITO, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 610-632.
4. BENJAMIN, A. S., BJORK, R. A., & SCHWARTZ, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a meta-mnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
5. BISANZ, G. L., VESONDER, G. T., & VOSS, J. F. (1978). Knowledge of one's own responding and the relation of such knowledge to learning: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 116-128.
6. CHEN, M. K., LAKSHMINARYANAN, V., & SANTOS, L. R. (2006). The evolution of our preferences: Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517-537.
7. DUNLOSKY, J., & HERTZOG, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 249-275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. DUNLOSKY, J., & NELSON, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 20, 374-380.
9. DUNLOSKY, J., & NELSON, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of JOLs to various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 545-565.
10. FINN, B., & METCALFE, J. (2007). The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 238-244.
11. FINN, B., & METCALFE, J. (2008). Judgments of learning are influenced by memory for past test. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 19-34.
12. FISCHHOFF, B., SLOVIC, P., & LICHTENSTEIN, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 552-564.
13. FRIENDLY, M., FRANKLIN, P. E., HOFFMAN, D., & RUBIN, D. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14, 375-399.
14. GLENBERG, A. M., WILKINSON, A. C., & EPSTEIN, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 10, 597-602.
15. HERTZOG, C., DUNLOSKY, J., ROBINSON, A. E., & KIDDER, D. P. (2003). Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 22-34.
16. HIRT, E. R., KARDES, F. R., & MARKMAN, K. D. (2004). Activating a mental simulation mind set through generation of alternatives: Implications for debiasing in related and unrelated domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 374-383.
17. HIRT, E. R., & MARKMAN, K. D. (1995). Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 1069-1086.
18. HOCH, S. J. (1985). Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 719-731.
19. KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 313-327.
20. KEARNEY, E. M., & ZECHMEISTER, E. B. (1989). Judgments of item difficulty by good and poor associative learners. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 365-383.
21. KELEMEN, W. L., FROST, P. J., & WEAVER, C. A., III (2000). Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 28, 92-107.
22. KOEHLER, D. J. (1991). Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 499-519.
23. KORIAT, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility model of feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
24. KORIAT, A. (1997). Monitoring one's knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
25. KORIAT, A. (2002). Metacognition research: An interim report. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 261-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. KORIAT, A., & BJORK, R. A. (2006). Mending metacognitive illusions: A comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 1133-1145.
27. KORIAT, A., BJORK, R. A., SHEFFER, L., & BAR, S. K. (2004). Predicting one's own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 643-656.
28. KORIAT, A., LICHTENSTEIN, S., & FISCHHOFF, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 107-118.
29. KORIAT, A., & MA'AYAN, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 478-492.
30. KORIAT, A., MA'AYAN, H., SHEFFER, L., & BJORK, R. A. (2006). Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 595-568.
31. KORIAT, A., SHEFFER, L., & MA'AYAN, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 147-162.
32. KORNELL, N., SON, L. K., & TERRACE, H. S. (2007). Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychological Science, 18, 64-71.
33. KÜHBERGER, A. (1997). Theoretical conceptions of framing effects in risky decisions. In R. Ranyard, W. R. Crozier, & O. Svenson (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 128-144). New York: Routledge.
34. LEVIN, I. P., SCHNEIDER, S. L., & GAETH, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
35. LICHTENSTEIN, S., & FISCHHOFF, B. (1980).Training for calibration. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 26, 149-171.
36. LICHTENSTEIN, S., FISCHHOFF, B., & PHILLIPS, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306-334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. LOVELACE, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 756-766.
38. MAKI, R. H. (1998). Predicting performance on text: Delayed versus immediate predictions and tests. Memory & Cognition, 26, 959-964.
39. MAKI, R. H., & BERRY, S. L. (1984). Metacomprehension of text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 663-679.
40. MAKI, R. H., SHIELDS, M., WHEELER, A. E., & ZACCHILLI, T. L. (2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 723-731.
41. MAKI, R. H., & SWETT, S. (1987). Metamemory for narrative text. Memory & Cognition, 15, 72-83.
42. MAZZONI, G., & CORNOLDI, C. (1993). Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 47-60.
43. MEETER, M., & NELSON, T. O. (2003). Multiple study trials and judgments of learning. Acta Psychologica, 113, 123-132.
44. METCALFE, J. (1998). Cognitive optimism: Self-deception or memory-based processing heuristics? Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2, 100-110.
45. METCALFE, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 349-363.
46. METCALFE, J., & FINN, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 174-179.
47. METCALFE, J., SCHWARTZ, B. L., & JOAQUIM, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 851-861.
48. NELSON, T. O., & DUNLOSKY, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect." Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
49. NELSON, T. O., & NARENS, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125-141). New York: Academic Press.
50. PRESSLEY, M., & GHATALA, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text. Educational Psychologist, 25, 19-33.
51. REDER, L. M. (1987). Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 90-138.
52. REDER, L. M. (1988). Strategic control of retrieval strategies. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 227-259). San Diego: Academic Press.
53. SCHECK, P., & NELSON, T. O. (2005). Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: Boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 124-128.
54. SERRA, M. J., & DUNLOSKY, J. (2005). Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1258-1266.
55. SON, L. K., & METCALFE, J. (2005). Judgments of learning: Evidence for a two-stage process. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1116-1129.
56. THIEDE, K. W. (1999). The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 662-667.
57. TVERSKY, A., & KAHNEMAN, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1130.
58. TVERSKY, A., & KAHNEMAN, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
59. UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1966). Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 673-679.
60. YAN, W. (1994). Learning ability and memory monitoring. Intelligence, 18, 215-229.
61. YATES, J. F., VEINOTT, E. S., & PATALANO, A. L. (2003). Hard decisions, bad decisions: On decision quality and decision aiding. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 13-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. ZECHMEISTER, E. B., & SHAUGHNESSY, J. J. (1980). When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 41-44.