Judgments of learning and improvement

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 204-216

  Townsend, Corinne L ^a   Heit, Evan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Metacognition; Metamemory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RECALL;

HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 79952192447     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0019-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
2. Dunlosky, J., & Matvey, G. (2001). Empirical analysis of the intrinsicextrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(5), 1180-1191. (Pubitemid 33684684)
3. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228-232.
4. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 779-788. (Pubitemid 39391658)
5. Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Judgments of learning are influenced by memory for past test. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 19-34.
6. Fletcher, W. "Phrases in English" database. Retrieved October 2006, from http://pie.usna.edu/index.html.
7. Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 160-170.
8. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
9. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517. (Pubitemid 126432208)
10. Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., & Ma'ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 147-162.
11. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of selfregulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 219-224.
12. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Optimising self-regulated study: The benefits-and costs-of dropping flashcards. Memory, 16, 125-136. (Pubitemid 351298192)
13. Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609-622. (Pubitemid 43883062)
14. Matvey, G., Dunlosky, J., & Schwartz, B. (2006). The effects of categorical relatedness on judgments of learning (JOLs). Memory, 14(2), 253-261. (Pubitemid 43272478)
15. Meeter, M., & Nelson, T. O. (2003). Multiple study trials and judgments of learning. Acta Psychologica, 113, 123-132. (Pubitemid 36881084)
16. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 174-179.
17. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2003). The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 530-542. (Pubitemid 37514231)
18. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2005). A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 463-477. (Pubitemid 40473679)
19. Moss, H., & Older, L. (1996). Birkbeck word association norms. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
20. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed JOL effect. Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
21. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1994). Norms of paired associate recall during multitrial learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents. Memory, 2, 325-335.
22. Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A., & Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207-213.
23. Reder, L., & Schunn, C. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 33-45.
25. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
26. Son, L. K., & Sethi, R. (2006). Metacognitive control and optimal learning. Cognitive Science, 30, 759-774. (Pubitemid 44420057)
27. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73. (Pubitemid 36338973)
28. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024-1037.
29. Townsend, C., & Heit, E. (2010). Metacognitive judgments of improvement are uncorrelated with learning rate. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.