Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 31, Issue , 2011, Pages 275-288

  Storch, Neomy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864642180     PISSN: 02671905     EISSN: 14716356     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1017/S0267190511000079     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? The speaking-writing connection in second language and academic literacy development. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral/literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 210-225). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Aldosari, A. (2008). The influence of proficiency levels, task type and social relationships on pair interaction: An EFL context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Melbourne, Australia.
3. Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teachers' social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 42-66.
4. Brooks, L., & Swain, M. (2009). Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation of and response to expertise. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 58-89). New York, NY: Routledge.
5. Bruffee, K. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Cumming, A. (1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482-511.
7. Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Pare, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. de la Colina, A. A.,&Garc'ia Mayo,M. P. (2007).Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. P. Garc'ia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91-116). London, UK: Multilingual Matters.
9. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Elgort, I., Smith, A., & Toland, J. (2008). Is wiki an effective platform for group course work? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 195-210.
11. Guti'errez, X. (2008). What does metalinguistic activity in L2 learners' interaction during a collaborative writing task look like? Modern Language Journal, 92, 519-537.
12. Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329-350.
13. Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 79-95.
14. Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23, 41-58.
15. Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Modern Language Journal, 92, 114-130.
16. Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211-234.
17. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002). The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 343-358.
18. Leeser,M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55-81.
19. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on language acquisition: Vol. 2. Second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
20. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2006). Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 169-178.
21. Mak, B., & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System, 36, 437-455.
22. Matthew, K., Felvegi, E., & Callaway, R. (2009). Wiki as a collaborative learning tool in a language arts methods class. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 51-72.
23. McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32, 207-224.
24. Mirel, B., & Spilka, R. (Eds.). (2002). Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Ortega, L. (2007). Meaning L2 practice in foreign language classrooms: A ognitiveinteractionist
27. SLA perspective. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 180-207). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28. Peretz, A. (2005). Teaching scientific/academic writing: A place for new technologies. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 3, 55-66.
29. Storch, N. (2001). Comparing ESL learners' attention to grammar on three different collaborative tasks. RELC Journal, 32, 104-124.
30. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 5, 119-158.
31. Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.
32. Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95-114.
33. Storch, N. (2009). The nature of pair interaction. Learners' interaction in an ESL class: Its nature and impact on grammatical development. Saarbr̈ucken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
34. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: Comparing individual and collaborative writing. In M. P. Garc'ia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp.157-177). London, UK: Multilingual Matters.
35. Strauss, P. (2001). "I'd rather vomit up a live hedgehog" -L2 students and group assessment in mainstream university programs. Prospect, 16, 55-66.
36. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
37. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
38. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40. Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95-108). London, UK: Continuum.
41. Swain, M. (2010). "Talking-it-through": Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use/learning (pp. 112-130). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 99-118). New York, NY: Longman.
43. Tan, L., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2010). Pair interactions and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 27.1-27.24.
44. Tocalli-Beller, A.,&Swain, M. (2005). Reformulation: The cognitive conflict and L2 learning it generates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15, 5-28.
45. Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-23.
46. Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer-peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 605-635.
47. Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121-142.
48. Weissberg, R. (2000). Developing relationships in the acquisition of English syntax: Writing versus speech. Learning and Instruction, 10, 37-53.
49. Weissberg, R. (2006). Connecting speaking and writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
50. Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 987-995.
51. Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pairs versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26, 445-466.
52. Wilkoff, B. (2007, May 10). Safety vs. panic [Web log post]. Discourse about discourse [blog]. Retrieved from http://yongesonne.edublogs.org/2007/05/ 10/safety-vs-panic/
53. Williams, J. (2008). The speaking-writing connection in second language and academic literacy development. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral/literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 10-25). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
54. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.