Pair interactions and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer mediated communication

Australian Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Tan, Lan Liana ^a   Wigglesworth, Gillian ^a   Storch, Neomy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650138491     PISSN: 01550640     EISSN: 18337139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2104/aral1027     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abrams, Zsuzsanna Ittzes. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157-167.
2. Aldosari, Ali; Storch, Neomy. (2006, July). Investigating pair work: The role of L1 in social relations across proficiency levels. Paper presented at the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia conference, Brisbane, Australia.
3. Beauvois, Margaret Healy. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 455-464.
4. Blake, Robert. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 120-136.
5. Donato, Richard. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. Firth, Alan; Wagner, Johannes. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285-300.
7. Firth, Alan; Wagner, Johannes. (2007). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in second language acquisition research. Modern Language Journal, 91, 755-770.
8. Gass, Susan; Varonis, Evangeline. (1986). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: conversations in SLA (pp. 327-351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
9. Ives, Debra. (2004). Three NS-NNS upper primary school pairs. A case study. Australian Language & Literacy Matters. 1(4), 11-16.
10. Kelm, Orlando. (1992). The use of synchronous and computer-networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 441-454.
11. Kitade, Keiko. (2000). Learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143-166.
12. Lantolf, James(2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79-96.
13. Lantolf, James; Thorne, Steven. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Long, Michael (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
15. Long, Michael. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
16. Long, Michael; Porter, Patricia A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-227.
17. Mackey, Alison. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
18. Ohta, Amy. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Pica, Theresa; Holliday, Lloyd; Lewis, Nora; Berducci, Dom; Newman, Jeanne. (1991). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343-376.
20. Roed, Jannie. (2003). Language and learner behaviour in a virtual environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(2-3), 155-172.
21. Schmidt, Richard. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13, 206-226.
22. Schmidt, Richard. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Storch, Neomy (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158.
24. Strauss, Pat; U. Alice. (2007). Group assessments: dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 147-161.
25. Swain, Merrill. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Swain, Merrill; Lapkin, Sharon. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337.
27. Vygotsky, Lev (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
28. Warschauer, Mark. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7-26.
29. Watanabe, Yoshinori. (2004). Collaborative dialogue between ESL learners of different proficiency levels: Linguistic and affective outcomes. Unpublished Master thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The University of Toronto, Canada.
30. Wigglesworth, Gillian; Storch, Neomy. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing. 26(3), 445-466.
31. Xie, Tianwei. (2002). Using Internet relay chat in teaching Chinese. CALICO Journal, 19(3), 513-524.