Future foreign language teachers' social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 42-66

  Arnold, Nike ^a   Ducate, Lara ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30644465820     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Abrams, Z. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and group journals: Expanding the repertoire of participant roles. System, 29, 489-503.
2. Abrams, Z. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal 87(2), 157-167.
3. Adair-Hauck, B. & Donato, R. (1994). Foreign language explanations within the zone of proximal development. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(3), 532-553.
4. Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulations and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 465-483.
5. Anton, M. & DiCamilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(3), 314-342.
6. Baym, N. K. (1995). The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated Communication and Community (pp. 138-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Bonk, C. & Cunningham, D. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. Bonk & K. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse (pp. 25-50). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
8. Bonk, C. & King, K. (1998). Computer conferencing and collaborative writing tools: Starting a dialogue about student dialogue. In C. Bonk & K. King (Eds.), Electronic Collaborators: Learner-centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse (pp. 3-24). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
9. Bonk, C., Hansen, E., Grabner-Hagen, M., Lazar, S., & Mirabelli, C. (1996). Time to 'connect': Synchronous and asynchronous case-based dialogue among pre-service teachers. In T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced Educational Technology: Research Issues and Future Potential (pp. 289-314). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
10. Bloom, B. S. and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: Longmans, Green.
11. Clinton, W. (1996). America's technology literacy challenge. Retrieved July 2, 2004, from http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/New/edtech/2pager.html
12. Cole, R., Raffier, L. M., Rogan, P., & Schleicher, L. (1998). Interactive group journals: Learning as a dialogue among learners. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 556-568.
13. Coughlin, P. & Duff, P. (1996). Same task, different activities: analysis of SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In Lantolf, J. & Appel, G. (Eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 173-193). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
14. Curtis, D., & Lawson, M. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. JALN, 5(1), 21-34. Retrieved July 10, 2004, from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v5n1/pdf/v5n1_curtis.pdf
15. DeWert, M. H., Babinski, L. M., & Jones, B. D. (2003). Safe passages: Providing online support for beginning teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 311-320.
16. Donate, R. (1996). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 33-56). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
17. Duffy, T., Dueber, B., & Hawley, C. (1996). Critical thinking in a distributed environment: A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems. In T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future potential (pp. 51-78). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
18. Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8(1), 8-34.
19. Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2004). Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 61-74.
20. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
21. Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 379-431.
22. Henri, F. & Rigault, C. R. (1996). Collaborative distance learning and computer conferencing. In T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced Educational Technology: Research Issues and Future Potential (pp. 45-76). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
23. Henri, F. (1995). Distance learning and computer-mediated communication: Interactive, quasi-interactive or monologue? In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 145-161). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
24. Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas & I. L. Goldstein (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (pp. 46-78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2000). Integrating computer-mediated communication tools into the practicum. In K. E. Johnson (Ed.), Teacher Education: Case studies in TESOL Practice Series (pp. 119-134). Alexandia, VA: TESOL.
26. Kang, I. (1996). The use of computer-mediated communication: Electronic collaboration and interactivity. In T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced Educational Technology: Research Issues and Future Potential. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
27. Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1996). Online social interchange, discord and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 57-74. Retrieved February 11, 2004, from http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol13.1/kanuka.html
28. Kassen, M. A., & Higgins, C. J. (1997). Meeting the technology challenge: Introducing teachers to language-learning technology. In M. D. Bush & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Technology-enhanced Language Learning (pp. 263-286). Lincolnwood, Illinois: National Textbook Company.
29. Kern, R. G., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243-260.
30. Koschmann, T., Kelson, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1996). Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm (pp. 83-124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Kumari, D. S. (2001). Connecting graduate students to virtual guests through asynchronous discussions - Analysis of an experience. JALN, 5(2), 53-63. Retrieved March 13, 2004, from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/pdf/v5n2_kumari.pdf
32. Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(3), 389-420.
33. Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners' communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35(1), 16-23.
34. Liou, H. (2001). Reflective practice in a pre-service teacher education process for high school English teachers in Taiwan. System, 29(2), 197-208.
35. Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2004). Going virtual: Inviting guests into the classroom. In L. Lomicka & J. Cooke-Plagwitz (Eds.), Teaching with Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 50-55). Boston: Thomson Heinle.
36. Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product. Computers & Education, 40(4), 377-391.
37. Mason, R. (1992). Evaluation methodologies for computer conferencing applications. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing. The Najaden Papers (pp. 105-116). New York: Springer Verlag.
38. Matsuda, A., & Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Autonomy and collaboration in teacher education: Journal sharing among native and nonnative English-speaking teachers. CATESOL Journal, 13(1), 109-121.
39. Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237-253.
40. McKenzie, W., & Murphy, D. (2000). "I hope this goes somewhere": Evaluation of an online discussion group. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 239-257. Retrieved March 5, 2004, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet16/mckenzie.html
41. Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. JALN, 7(3), 55-65. Retrieved February 19, 2004, from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/pdf/v7n3_meyer.pdf
42. Meyer, K. A. (2004). Evaluating online discussions: Four different frames of analysis. JALN, 8(2), 101-114. Retrieved June 17, 2004, from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v8n2/pdf/v8n2_meyer.pdf
43. Mitchell, J. (2003). On-line writing: A link to learning in a teacher education program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 127-143.
44. Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Cochrane, C., & Webb, B. (1996). An experiment in group learning technology: Evaluating critical thinking in face-to-face and computer-supported seminars. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 4(1), 57-74. Retrieved June 17, 2004, from http://www.helsinki.fi/science/optek/1996/n1/newman.txt
45. Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 3(2), 56-77. Retrieved June 17, 2004, from http://www.helsinki.fi/science/optek/1995/n2/newman.txt
46. Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C.-F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 119-140. Retrieved February 7, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/pawan/
47. Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243-265.
48. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, R. D., & Archer W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2). Retrieved February 25, 2005, from http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol14.2/rourke_et_al.html
49. Salaberry, M. R. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 28-37.
50. Schallert, D. L., Reed, J. H., & D-Team, t. (2003). Intellectual, motivational, textual, and cultural considerations in teaching and learning with computer-mediated discussion. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 103-118.
51. Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 103-134. Retrieved May 6, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/sengupta/
52. Warschauer, M. (2000). Online learning in second language classrooms: an ethnographic study. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp.41-58). New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81 (4), 470-481.
54. Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & Roberts, B. (1996). Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 24(1), 1-14.
55. Weasenforth, D., Biesenbach-Lucas, S., & Meloni, C. (2002). Realizing constructivist objectives through collaborative technologies: Threaded discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 58-86. Retrieved June 18, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/weasenforth/
56. Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G. L. (1992). Constructing Knowledge Together. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
57. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.