Revisiting CEWIGs: A reflection on the usage of collocations of ‘English’ with ‘world’, ‘international’ and ‘global’

English Today

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 42-51

  Watterson, Matthew ^a  

^a Hong Ik University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864641390     PISSN: 02660784     EISSN: 14740567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266078411000137     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Ahulu S. 1998. ‘Lexical variation in international English.’ English Today, 14(3), 29–34.
2. Aiken J. 1933. ‘“Basic” and World English.' American Speech, 8(4), 17–21.
3. Aiken J. 1934. ‘English as an international language.’ American Speech, 9(2), 98–110.
4. Allen R. 2000. ‘Size matters.’ English Today, 16(2), 57–61.
5. Bailey R. & Görlach M. (eds.) 1984. English as a World Language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6. Barrows S. 1926. ‘Review: Euphon English and world-standard English in America by Margueritte de Witt.’ American Speech, 2(2), 104–5.
7. Bell A. 1888. ‘The claims of the English language to universality.’ Science, 12(306), 291–3.
8. Bell A. 1889. ‘“Alphabetic law” and “World-English”.’ Science, 13(327), 369.
9. Bell A. 1890. ‘Phonetics.’ PMLA: Journal of the Modern Language Association of America, 5(1), 23–32.
10. Bonnema H. 1976. ‘boihuud difficultyz in the 1890’z, bie Harry M. Veenstra.’ Spelling Progress Bulletin, 16(4) 9–13.
11. Bruton A. 2005. ‘World English: The medium or the learning? A reply to Kanvillil Rajagopalan.’ ELT Journal, 58(2), 255–7.
12. Brutt-Griffler J. 2002. World English: A Study of its Development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
13. Buttigieg J. 1999. ‘Teaching English and developing a critical knowledge of the global.’ boundary 2, 26(2), 45–57.
14. Clark Barrett H. 1931. ‘Review: Speak the speech.’ American Literature, 3(3), 351–3.
15. Colburn R. 1897. ‘Diversity of languages.’ Science, 6(149), 682–8.
16. Collitz H. 1926. ‘World languages.’ Language, 2(1), 1–13.
17. Crystal D. 1998. ‘Isaac Pitman: The linguistic legacy.’ English Today, 14(3), 94–5.
18. Crystal D. 2001. ‘The future of Englishes.’ In Burns A. & Coffin C. (eds.), Analysing English in a Global Context. London: Routledge, pp. 53–64.
19. Crystal D. 2003. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Davidson K. 2007. ‘The nature and significance of English as a global language.’ English Today, 23(1), 48–50.
21. Davies A. 1989. ‘Is International English an interlanguage?’ TESOL Quarterly, 23(3), 447–67.
22. De Beaugrande R. 1999. ‘Theory and practice in the discourse of language planning.’ World Englishes, 18(2), 107–21.
23. De Witt M. 1925. ‘Our Americanadian problem of the spoken word.’ American Speech, 1(3), 170–80.
24. Editors. 1888. ‘Notes and news.’ Science, 11(280), 285–6.
25. Editors. 1930. ‘Notes and quotes.’ American Speech, 6(2), 147–8.
26. Editors. 1962. ‘Bibliography.’ American Speech, 37(4), 275–82.
27. Erling Elizabeth. 2005. ‘The many names of English.’ English Today, 21(1), 40–4.
28. Ferguson C. 1994. ‘Note on Swedish English.’ World Englishes, 13(3), 419–24.
29. Gillman S. 2005. ‘The new, newest thing: Have American studies gone imperial?’ American Literary History, 17(1), 196–214.
30. Goad H. 1942. ‘International English.’ English: Journal of the English Association, 4(22), 120–2.
31. Graddol D. 2006. English Next. Why Global English May Mean the End of ‘English as a Foreign Language’. Milton Keynes: The British Council. Online at: < http://www.britishcouncil.org/files/documents/learning-research-english-next.pdf > (Accessed September 25, 2010)
32. Griffin J. 1997. ‘Global English invades Poland.’ English Today, 13(2), 34–9.
33. Griffin J. 2001. ‘Global English infiltrates Bulgaria.’ English Today, 17(4), 54–60.
34. Halliday M. 2006. ‘Written language, standard language, global language.’ In Kachru Y. & Nelson C. (eds.), The Handbook of World Englishes. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 349–65.
35. Holland R. 2002. ‘Globospeak? Questioning text on the role of English as a global language.’ Language and Intercultural Communication, 2(1), 5–24.
36. Hung T. (2002). ‘“New English” words in international English dictionaries.’ English Today, 18(4), 29–34.
37. Imam S. 2005. ‘English as a global language and the question of nation-building education in Bangladesh.’ Comparative Education, 41(4), 471–86.
38. Jenkins J. 1998. ‘Which pronunciation norms and models for English as an international language?’ ELT Journal, 52(2), 119–26.
39. Jenkins J. 2001. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Jenkins J. 2006. ‘The spread of EIL: A testing time for testers.’ ELT Journal, 60(1), 42–50.
41. Johnson R. 1990. ‘International English: Towards an acceptable, teachable target variety.’ World Englishes, 9(3) 301–15.
42. Judd E. 1981. ‘Language policy, curriculum development, and TESOL instruction: A search for compatibility.’ TESOL Quarterly, 15(1), 59–66.
43. Kachru Y., & Smith L. 2009. ‘The karmic cycle of world Englishes: Some futuristic constructs.’ World Englishes, 28(1), 1–14.
44. Kaye A. 1999. ‘On the term “International English”.’ English Today, 15(2), 31–3.
45. Kaye A. 2003. ‘Review: The Vocabulary of World English by Stephen Gramby.’ Language, 79(3), 655.
46. Kemp M. 1927. ‘Fay on pronunciation.’ American Speech, 2(7), 322–3.
47. Kemp M. 1928. ‘The International Council for English.’ American Speech, 3(4), 261–75.
48. Lee-Wong S. (2001). ‘The polemics of Singlish.’ English Today, 17(1), 39–45.
49. Li D. 2003. ‘Between English and Esperanto: What does it take to be a world language?’ International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 164, 33–63.
50. Llurda E. 2004. ‘Non-native-speaker teachers and English as an international language.’ International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 126–41.
51. Matsuda A. 2003. ‘Incorporating World Englishes in teaching English as an international language.’ TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 719–29.
52. McArthur T. (2003). ‘World English, Euro-English, Nordic English?’ English Today, 19(1), 54–8.
53. McArthur T. 2004. ‘Is it world or international or global English, and does it matter?’ English Today, 29(3), 3–15.
54. McKay S. 2003. ‘Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Reexamining common ELT assumptions.’ International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–22.
55. Modiano M. 1999. ‘International English in the global village.’ English Today, 15(2), 22–8.
56. Modiano M. 2001. ‘Linguistic imperialism, cultural integrity, and EIL.’ ELT Journal, 55(4), 339–46.
57. Murray H. 1927. ‘Philology: General works.’ The Year's Work in English Studies, 8(1), 41–73.
58. Nadkarni M. 1992. ‘On liberating English to be a world language.’ World Englishes, 11(2/3), 331–9.
59. Nelson G. 2006. ‘World Englishes and corpora studies.’ In Kachru Y. & Nelson C. (eds.), The Handbook of World Englishes. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 733–50.
60. Nunan D. 2001. ‘English as a global language.’ TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 605–6.
61. Pakir A. 1999. ‘Connecting with English in the context of internationalisation.’ TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 103–14.
62. Pennycook A. 2003. ‘Global Englishes, rip slyme, and performativity.’ Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 513–33.
63. Promodrou L. 2006. ‘Defining the successful bilingual speaker of English.’ In Rubdy & Saraceni (eds.), 51–70.
64. Pulgram E. 1948. ‘An international language – when?’ The Modern Language Journal, 32(1), 50–68.
65. Rajagopalan K. 2004. ‘The concept of “world English” and its implications for ELT.’ ELT Journal, 58(2), 111–17.
66. Reda G. 2003. ‘English coursebooks: Prototype texts and basic vocabulary names.’ ELT Journal, 57(3), 260–8.
67. Reeves N. (2002). ‘Translation, international English, and the planet of Babel.’ English Today, 18(4), 21–8.
68. Ross N. 1997. ‘Signs of international English.’ English Today, 13(2), 29–33.
69. Rubdy R. & Saraceni M. 2006. ‘Introduction.’ In Rubdy R. & Saraceni M. (eds.), English in the World: Global Rules, Global Roles. London: Continuum, pp. 5–16.
70. Schneider E. 2003. ‘The dynamics of new Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth.’ Language, 79(2), 233–81.
71. Smith L. 1983a. ‘English as an auxiliary international language.’ In Smith L. (ed.), Readings in English as an International Language. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 1–5.
72. Smith L. 1983b. ‘English as an international language: No room for chauvinism.’ In Smith L. (ed.), Readings in English as an International Language. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 7–11.
73. Smith L. 1983c. ‘Some distinctive features of EIIL vs ESOL in English language education.’ In Smith L. (ed.), Readings in English as an International Language. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 13–20.
74. Smith R. 2005. ‘Global English: Gift or curse.’ English Today, 21(2), 56–62.
75. Tan P., Ooi V. & Chiang A. 2006. ‘World Englishes or English as a lingua franca: A view from the perspective of non-anglo Englishes.’ In Rubdy R. & Saraceni M. (eds.), English in the World: Global Rules, Global Roles. London: Continuum, pp. 84–94.
76. Tomlinson B. 2006. A multi-dimensional approach to teaching English for the world. In Rubdy R. & Saraceni M. (eds.), English in the World: Global Rules, Global Roles. London: Continuum, pp. 130–50.
77. Tovati A., & Jewett A. 1963. ‘The world of English: The profession.’ The English Journal, 52(2), 137–42.
78. Trudgill P. & Hannah J. (eds.) 1994. International English: A Guide to the Varieties of Standard English (3rd edn). London: Edward Arnold.
79. Warschauer M. 2000. ‘The changing global economy and the future of English teaching.’ TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 511–35.
80. Weiner E. 1987. ‘The new OED and World English.’ English Teaching, 11, 31–34.
81. West M. 1934. ‘English as a world language.’ American Speech, 9(3), 163–74.
82. Widdowson H. 1997. ‘EIL, ESL, EFL: Global issues and local interests.’ World Englishes, 16(1), 138–45.
83. Wilcox W. 1914. ‘The teaching of simplified spelling in normal and elementary schools.’ The English Journal, 3(2), 78–85.
84. Wright R. 2004. ‘Latin and English as world languages.’ English Today, 20(4), 3–13.