Transcriptional consequences of aneuploidy

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 31, 2012, Pages 12644-12649

  Sheltzer, Jason M ^a   Torres, Eduardo M ^a   Dunham, Maitreya J ^b   Amon, Angelika ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosomal instability; Stress response; Trisomy

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTOR DOWN REGULATION; RECEPTOR UPREGULATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMALS; ARABIDOPSIS; CELL LINE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; HUMANS; MICE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

MUS;

EID: 84864497571     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1209227109     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Musacchio A, Salmon ED (2007) The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:379-393. (Pubitemid 46643240)
2. Weaver BA, Cleveland DW (2006) Does aneuploidy cause cancer? Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:658-667. (Pubitemid 44692476)
3. Hassold T, et al. (1996) Human aneuploidy: Incidence, origin, and etiology. Environ Mol Mutagen 28:167-175. (Pubitemid 26380273)
4. Brown S (2008) Miscarriage and its associations. Semin Reprod Med 26:391-400.
5. Delabar JM, et al. (1993) Molecular mapping of twenty-four features of Down syndrome on chromosome 21. Eur J Hum Genet 1:114-124.
6. Korenberg JR, et al. (1994) Down syndrome phenotypes: The consequences of chromosomal imbalance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:4997-5001. (Pubitemid 24177778)
7. Olson LE, Richtsmeier JT, Leszl J, Reeves RH (2004) A chromosome 21 critical region does not cause specific Down syndrome phenotypes. Science 306:687-690. (Pubitemid 39440917)
8. Olson LE, et al. (2007) Trisomy for the Down syndrome 'critical region' is necessary but not sufficient for brain phenotypes of trisomic mice. Hum Mol Genet 16:774-782. (Pubitemid 47061624)
9. Korbel JO, et al. (2009) The genetic architecture of Down syndrome phenotypes revealed by high-resolution analysis of human segmental trisomies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12031-12036.
10. Roper RJ, Reeves RH (2006) Understanding the basis for Down syndrome phenotypes. PLoS Genet 2:e50.
11. Torres EM, Williams BR, Amon A (2008) Aneuploidy: Cells losing their balance. Genetics 179:737-746.
12. Zhang F, Gu W, Hurles ME, Lupski JR (2009) Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10:451-481.
13. Torres EM, et al. (2007) Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317:916-924. (Pubitemid 47301313)
14. Torres EM, et al. (2010) Identification of aneuploidy- toleratingmutations. Cell 143:71-83.
15. Williams BR, et al. (2008) Aneuploidy affects proliferation and spontaneous immortalization in mammalian cells. Science 322:703-709.
16. Tang Y-C, Williams BR, Siegel JJ, Amon A (2011) Identification of aneuploidy-selective antiproliferation compounds. Cell 144:499-512.
17. Sheltzer JM, et al. (2011) Aneuploidy drives genomic instability in yeast. Science 333:1026-1030.
18. Gasch AP, et al. (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11:4241-4257.
19. Brauer MJ, et al. (2008) Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 19:352-367. (Pubitemid 351186159)
20. Regenberg B, et al. (2006) Growth-rate regulated genes have profound impact on interpretation of transcriptome profiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol 7:R107.
21. Pavelka N, et al. (2010) Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 468:321-325.
22. Hughes TR, et al. (2000) Widespread aneuploidy revealed by DNA microarray expression profiling. Nat Genet 25:333-337. (Pubitemid 30437324)
23. Chikashige Y, et al. (2007) Gene expression and distribution of Swi6 in partial aneuploids of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cell Struct Funct 32:149-161. (Pubitemid 351483587)
24. Breitling R, Armengaud P, Amtmann A, Herzyk P (2004) Rank products: A simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments. FEBS Lett 573:83-92. (Pubitemid 39141040)
25. Chen D, et al. (2003) Global transcriptional responses of fission yeast to environmental stress. Mol Biol Cell 14:214-229. (Pubitemid 36106031)
26. Huettel B, Kreil DP, Matzke M, Matzke AJM (2008) Effects of aneuploidy on genome structure, expression, and interphase organization in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 4:e1000226.
27. Kilian J, et al. (2007) The AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: Protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV-B light, drought and cold stress responses. Plant J 50:347-363. (Pubitemid 46624141)
28. Ferreiro I, et al. (2010) Whole genome analysis of p38 SAPK-mediated gene expression upon stress. BMC Genomics 11:144.
29. Moldrich RX, et al. (2009) Proliferation deficits and gene expression dysregulation in Down's syndrome (Ts1Cje) neural progenitor cells cultured from neurospheres. J Neurosci Res 87:3143-3152.
30. Contestabile A, Fila T, Bartesaghi R, Ciani E (2009) Cell cycle elongation impairs proliferation of cerebellar granule cell precursors in the Ts65Dn mouse, an animal model for Down syndrome. Brain Pathol 19:224-237.
31. Slonim DK, et al. (2009) Functional genomic analysis of amniotic fluid cell-free mRNA suggests that oxidative stress is significant in Down syndrome fetuses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9425-9429.
32. Jovanovic SV, Clements D, MacLeod K (1998) Biomarkers of oxidative stress are significantly elevated in Down syndrome. Free Radic Biol Med 25:1044-1048. (Pubitemid 28558330)
33. Li M, et al. (2010) The ATM-p53 pathway suppresses aneuploidy-induced tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:14188-14193.
34. Geiler-Samerotte KA, et al. (2011) Misfolded proteins impose a dosage-dependent fitness cost and trigger a cytosolic unfolded protein response in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:680-685.
35. Stefani M (2004) Protein misfolding and aggregation: New examples in medicine and biology of the dark side of the protein world. Biochim Biophys Acta 1739:5-25.
36. Katz W, Weinstein B, Solomon F (1990) Regulation of tubulin levels and microtubule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Consequences of altered tubulin gene copy number. Mol Cell Biol 10:5286-5294.
37. Anders KR, et al. (2009) A strategy for constructing aneuploid yeast strains by transient nondisjunction of a target chromosome. BMC Genet 10:36.
38. Weaver BAA, Silk AD, Montagna C, Verdier-Pinard P, Cleveland DW (2007) Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell 11:25-36. (Pubitemid 46070223)
39. Sotillo R, et al. (2007) Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Cell 11:9-23. (Pubitemid 46054519)
40. Remeseiro S, et al. (2012) Cohesin-SA1 deficiency drives aneuploidy and tumourigenesis in mice due to impaired replication of telomeres. EMBO J 31:2076-2089.
41. Sotillo R, Schvartzman J-M, Socci ND, Benezra R (2010) Mad2-induced chromosome instability leads to lung tumour relapse after oncogene withdrawal. Nature 464:436-440.
42. Walther A, Houlston R, Tomlinson I (2008) Association between chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Gut 57:941-950. (Pubitemid 351919529)
43. Birkbak NJ, et al. (2011) Paradoxical relationship between chromosomal instability and survival outcome in cancer. Cancer Res 71:3447-3452.
44. Altug-Teber O, et al. (2007) Specific transcriptional changes in human fetuses with autosomal trisomies. Cytogenet Genome Res 119:171-184. (Pubitemid 351235048)
45. Mao R, et al. (2005) Primary and secondary transcriptional effects in the developing human Down syndrome brain and heart. Genome Biol 6:R107.
46. Koide K, et al. (2011) Transcriptomic analysis of cell-free fetal RNA suggests a specific molecular phenotype in trisomy 18. Hum Genet 129:295-305.