Any Effects of Different Levels of Online User Identity Revelation?

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 64-77

  Yu, Fu Yun ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Anonymity; Computer mediated communication; Nickname; Peer assessment; Question generation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864406721     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abramovich, S., & Cho, E. K. (2006). Technology as a medium for elementary preteachers' problem-posing experience in Mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(4), 309-323.
2. Barlow, A., & Cates, J. M. (2006). The impact of problem posing on elementary teachers' beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 106(2), 64-73.
3. Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 79-90.
4. Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The Art of Problem Posing, 3rd Edition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Cooper, W. H., Gallupe, R. B., Pollard, S., & Cadsby, J. (1998). Some liberating effects of anonymous electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29(2), 147-178.
6. DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5), 589-609.
7. Dunn, S., & Hansford, B. (1997). Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(6), 1299-1306.
8. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322.
9. Fellenz, M. R. (2004). Using assessment to support higher level learning: The multiple choice item development assignment. Assessment and Education in Higher Education, 29(6), 703-719.
10. Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47(2), 382-389.
11. Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A. (2007). The influence of web-based chemistry learning on students' perceptions, attitudes, and achievements. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(2), 179-197.
12. Franzoi, S. L. (2006). Social Psychology, 4th edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
13. Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 365-377.
14. Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M. M., & Barton, W. N. (1973). Deviance in the dark. Psychology Today, 7, 129-130.
15. Ghaith, G. (2003). The relationship between forms of instruction, achievement and perceptions of classroom climate. Educational Research, 45(1), 83-93.
16. Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53-70.
17. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychology aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123-1134.
18. Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 526-537.
19. Liu, Z. F., Chiu, C. H., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transaction on Education, 44(3), 246-251.
20. Lurie, S., Nofziger, A., Meldrum, S., Mooney, C., & Epstein, R. (2006). Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students. Medical Education, 40(11), 1088-1097.
21. Moral-Toranzo, F., Canto-Ortiz, J., & Gómez-Jacinto, L. (2007). Anonymity effects in computer-mediated communication in the case of minority influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1660-1674.
22. Moses, B. M., Bjork, E., & Goldenberg, E. P. (1993). Beyond problem solving: Problem posing. In Brown, S. I. & Walter, M. I. (Eds.) Problem posing: Reflections and applications (pp. 178-188). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Newby, T. J., Stepich, D., Lehman, J., & Russell, J. D. (2006). Educational Technology for Teaching and Learning, 3rd edition. Merrill, New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.
24. Palme, J., & Berglund, M. (2002). Anonymity on the Internet. Retrieved August 15, 2009, from http://people.dsv.su.se/~jpalme/society/anonymity.html
25. Pinsonneault, A., & Heppel, N. (1997-98). Anonymity in group support systems research: A new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(3), 89-108.
26. Postmes, T., & Lea, M. (2000). Social processes and group decision making: anonymity in group decision support systems. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1252-1274.
27. Purchase, H. C. (2000). Learning about interface design through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 341-352.
28. Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2007). Instructional Technology and Media for Learning, 9th edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
29. Stanier, L. (1997). Peer assessment and group work as vehicles for student empowerment: A module evaluation. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(1), 95-98.
30. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
31. Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241-252.
32. van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal and structural features. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 41-54.
33. Vreman-de Olde, C., & de Jong, T. (2004). Student-generated assignments about electrical circuits in a computer simulation. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 859-873.
34. Wen, M., & Tsai, C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27-44.
35. Whiten, D. J. (2004). Exploring the strategy of problem posing. In Bright, G. W. & Rubenstein, R. N. (Eds.) Professional development guidebook for perspectives on the teaching of mathematics: Companion to the sixty-sixth yearbook (pp. 1-4). Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
36. Wilson, E. V. (2004). ExamNet asynchronous learning network: Augmenting face-to-face courses with student-developed exam questions. Computers & Education, 42(1), 87-103.
37. Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher-student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1-2), 6-24.
38. Yu, F. Y. (2001). Competition within computer-assisted cooperative learning environments: cognitive, affective and social outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24 (2), 99-117.
39. Yu, F. Y. (2003). The mediating effects of anonymity and proximity in an online synchronized competitive learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(2), 153-167.
40. Yu, F. Y. (2005). Promoting metacognitive strategy development through online question-generation instructional approach. Proceeding of International Conference on Computers in Education 2005 (pp. 564-571). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
41. Yu, F. Y. (2009). Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1129-1138.
42. Yu, F. Y., Han, C. L., & Chan, T. W. (2008). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and anonymous real-time team competition in a networked gaming learning environment. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 511-514.
43. Yu, F. Y., & Hung, C.-C. (2006). An empirical analysis of online multiple-choice question-generation learning activity for the enhancement of students' cognitive strategy development while learning science. Lecture Series on Computer and Computational Sciences: Recent Progress in Computational Sciences and Engineering. Selected Papers from the International Conference on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering (ICCMSE2006) (pp. 585-588). Chania, Crete, Greece.
44. Yu, F. Y., & Liu, Y. H. (2005). Potential values of incorporating multiple-choice question-construction for physics experimentation instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 27(11), 1319-1335.
45. Yu, F. Y., & Liu, Y. H. (2009). Creating a psychologically safe online space for a student-generated questions learning activity via different identity revelation modes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1109-1123.
46. Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4), 337-348.